Toyota Might Be Planning Massive Changes to Its Trucks and SUVs | Gear Patrol
A report citing a Toyota insider suggests that new versions of the Land Cruiser, 4Runner and Sequoia SUVs and Tacoma and Tundra trucks will arrive soo
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I don’t want a stripped down land cruiser. I owned a fj cruiser it was loud, rough, unrefined, bouncy, seats just sucked... I loved it and hated it... I tried to go to a 4 runner limited pretty much the same thing but a little better...I know that i may be in the minority...but IF above is true, then i am 101% glad that i got LC200. I love the LC because it is luxurious (quiet, great ride even with KO2, nice leather and audio system), has the legendary nameplate, off-road capable, and legendary build quality / durability......and rarely seen on the streets. It is rare to see another LC. Plenty of LX and GX and 4runners.
The new LC300/LX looks like it will force customers to pick either capability or luxury, not both. The LX next gen will have capability i am sure, but it looks like Lexus will continue with its body spoilers galore trend. The LC300 will be more rudimentary, based on tundra, and will be more bare bones...like Sequoia / 4runner trim? With the cheap plastics and hollow panels?? Will you see one at every corner?
I hope that i am wrong or right...can’t make up my mind....
If I wanted pure capability I probably would have bought a Jeep (I know, shoot me) or a Taco. But I want as many *reliable* creature comforts as I can reasonably get.
The way I travel now is much less a question of ‘what do I really need’ and more of ‘what do I need to get there and be comfortable to the destination, at the destination, and back’.
A Sequoia is probably just as comfortable as a 200. So if the big cruiser is axed you still have options.If I wanted pure capability I probably would have bought a Jeep (I know, shoot me) or a Taco. But I want as many *reliable* creature comforts as I can reasonably get.
The way I travel now is much less a question of ‘what do I really need’ and more of ‘what do I need to get there and be comfortable to the destination, at the destination, and back’.
A Sequoia is probably just as comfortable as a 200. So if the big cruiser is axed you still have options.
Too big for me and not as capable off-road.A Sequoia is probably just as comfortable as a 200. So if the big cruiser is axed you still have options.
Yeah - I've seen that second hand with many friends. The Gladiator has seemed o fix that issue though. And it finally has a realistic payload. Previous Jeeps, including the Rubicon, where way under built from stock. That's a big reason why I never bought one - I can drive a totally stock Land Cruiser, loaded up with gear, anywhere (short of rock crawling) directly from the dealer.Jeeps are capable...
...rrrright up until they break.
And...they break...a LOT.
No thanks.
Well nothing is perfect, even the 200, so their is always going to be some trade offs. If you don't want to go that big their is still the GX.Too big for me and not as capable off-road.
Just had a JL in the shop with 20k miles with the 4 cylinder turbo. Had a severe oil leak and had a check engine light on already.Jeeps are capable...
...rrrright up until they break.
And...they break...a LOT.
No thanks.
Well nothing is perfect, even the 200, so their is always going to be some trade offs. If you don't want to go that big their is still the GX.