I heard back from the lighting expert on my question about LED bulbs being run in a halogen housing like the Hella Vision Plus or the OEM Toyota Koito set ups. After reading this reply, I checked my
Amazon app, found I could return the $75 sets of LEDs I bought for Scout and Falcor and bought the new Philips RacingVision GT200 bulbs that he has most recently tested/recommended.
I've also asked him if he'd like to embark on a project to compare the lighting output and beam pattern on the Koito housings vs the Hellas. I'm curious because the fluting is different and the design is quite a bit different.... stay tuned.
Hey Adam,
Apologies for the delayed reply.
First let me show you an interesting plot from some data I collected (posted in the 3rd Gen headlight thread) that took me a while to comprehend. It is simplistic, but illustrates and interesting point. This was testing various light sources in a 3rd Gen Tacoma projector.
What is interesting here is that all light sources reduce in intensity linearly compared to each other, except for LED. In reality, all light sources reduce in intensity at the same rate, but then why does the data look different for LED? The answer is that when you test LEDs in a halogen assembly at short range the pattern is not fully integrated/smoothed as you are using a bi-directional light source in a housing designed for an omni-directional light source. This essentially creates irregular hotspots in the reading that inflate the LED numbers. So when I test an LED light source in a halogen assembly, I test it at 42' (which is my max practical distance) which allows it to better integrate into the beam for an accurate reading. Diode Dynamics does their testing at 50'. Short distances will artificially inflate the LEDs lux number, and this is especially true for units that are poorly designed to prioritize output over focus making short distance testing even worse for product recommendations. I bring this up because Bulb Facts tests LEDs in halogen assemblies at 12'. The data is not going to be accurate and heavily incorrectly skewed to LED. Its also worth noting that site operates by kickbacks for whatever link you click to buy the recommended product, many LED brands will be willing to give heavier kick backs than a name brand lighting company that isn't going to give any.
Output is only one part of the equation, a more important part is focus. Take a look at the chart below of low beam testing done on an 2nd Gen Tacoma H4 reflector assembly.
Note the 2nd from the left is a 90w Hella bulb, vastly more light output that the next 8 bulbs to the right that are running at 55w. Yet the other bulbs outperform the Hella in lighting intensity, even though the Hella is putting out far more light. Because all those other bulbs have superior focus and the way you get better focus for higher intensity output is making the light source smaller. With significantly less light output the Philips Racing Vision bulb puts out 20% more light intensity than the far more powerful Hella. This demonstrates how important focus is, and such small changes in geometry of light source size have significant impact on performance. You can see a short article by Philips explaining this works
here. But the take away, is that smaller light sources provide better focus which causes to higher intensity output and extended distance projection. Replacement LEDs are larger light sources, much much larger. As an example:
Here is the target width:
The current most advanced focused LED bulb on the market
Larger LEDs lead to loss of focus, which reduces your hotspot and reduces your distance projection. Instead, the loss of focus shifts the pattern and increases foreground light while reducing distance light. So even though they might be brighter, the additional light isn't used in a way that is beneficial, and can actually be counter productive.
The problem with increased foreground light, is that bright foreground light reduces your distance night vision, especially if you are compounding it with reducing your focus/hot spot/distance light. But the other issue is that people intrinsically like foreground light, it makes people feel better to have the area immediately in-front them lit up as we tend to judge light by what is closest to us, hence why you see so many people drive with their fogs on in clear weather. So when you get into a vehicle that has replacement LEDs and see a big increase in foreground light most peoples initial reaction is very positive, because of the large increase in light very close to you, even thought that isn't how a headlight is supposed to work.
You also run into issues on non-uniform light distribution. Since the LEDs only fire to the sides, they don't light up the whole housing like a halogen. In this picture below on my 2nd Gen Tacoma, you can see the area directly above the LED is not illuminated, because the LEDs only point to the sides. Those flutes not being illuminated means your are going to have areas in your pattern that are not getting light that should be.
The changes in geometry from the LED vs the halogen that the housing was designed for can also cause increased glare to oncoming drivers. Needless to say there is a lot that goes into a light source, and using an LED one in an assembly designed for halogens is full of compromises and generally speaking not a good practice. Replacement LED bulbs have never been legal, but NHSTA banned the sale of replacement LED bulbs for headlights earlier this year, forcing all domestic brands to recall their products. LEDs can work better in some headlight than others, due to their side-firing nature very short and wide rectangular lights are typically best suited, and round lights are typically among the worst.
So very long winded answer, no I would not recommend LEDs in your 7" housings, you'll get much better results with the proper halogen in a halogen assembly.
If you want to run LED, the appropriate way to do it is in an 7" LED assembly. I now drive a Gladiator, which has 9" round headlights but there are limited options in that size. There are 9"->7" conversion adapters, so I've done some evaluation of 7" LED headlights as well. I drive the passes in the snow often so a requirement for me is heated headlights, which really limits the options. You might find this post on comparing two 7" headlights interesting,
#5369. Another interesting looking product that just came out at the Morimoto Retrobrights, lamps designed around their proprietary LED light source for vintage looks with claimed proper optics.
Holley RetroBright LFRB135 Holley RetroBright LED Headlight - Classic White (3000K) - https://www.holley.com/products/exterior/lighting/headlight/round_headlights/parts/LFRB135
Assuming those assemblies are H4, I'd check out this thread for performance lighting suggestions. Ignore the part about light assemblies.
The ultimate headlight upgrade H4 (not LED or HID) - https://www.tacomaworld.com/threads/the-ultimate-headlight-upgrade-h4-not-led-or-hid.398066/
I love the old FJ40s. I wouldn't be opposed to doing a 7" round light project, I'd done several other vehicles as well. I've got a bunch of stuff in my queue at the moment though. What exactly did you have in mind?