Your dreaming again. a PUG usually averages 5 to 6 litre per 100km. there pretty efficient (but we are talking about old cruisers right??) 6 lts/100 km? where? tell me the model and is it a commercial production? I avoid cars with no resale, so RR does not fit my buy list. My personal preference is not to buy a depreciating asset. So most of my cars and bikes are pre 1975 right back to 1928. And lets stick to averages (which I have done) 10 lt to the 100km is very very acceptable for a proper 4 wheel drive. Your best result obvious excludes average influences.You can move a few tons down the road at 100km/h and use around 6 litres/100km. You simply need a more efficient engine than the old 2H and very high gearing. Go buy a new Range Rover and see for yourself.
Even my 4BD1T has done a best ever of 8.6 litres/100km (~33 MPG). It averages 10km/h on the road.
Turbos and extractors vs hiclones? Sorry, not even close to the same thing. Dyno tests show that Turbos and extractors actually work.
Now you explain turbo's and extractors as not being the same thing.........are you for real? Did you Phone a friend.? Or are you just trying to misrepresent a sentence? Contributions on this web site seem to have lacked value.......without leaving the door open.........I refer to you dougal
( retain std wheels n tyres on my 85 and 45 psi )