The breed of men who loves rough riding trucks that rattle and shake all the way down the road has gone the way of the dinosaur, I'm afraid. Hell, even when those trucks were state of the art, a person would have been hard pressed to choose that over a smooth, quiet ride that is 95% as capable.
Is it my opinion that IFS is superior off-road to a solid axle? No. HAS ANYONE SAID THAT IN THIS THREAD? NO!!!! All Shotts has said is that he wouldn't trade the IFS in his 100 for a SFA. He likes the compromise! Get it????
What we are discussing is the marketability of a vehicle. A vehicle with the traits you described,
Trucks are supposed to ride like hell. That's why guys like them. I like the windows rolled down, swampers humming so loud you can hear them in the next county over, and suspension feedback to let me know what I'm driving on. I'm in no particular hurry and driving fast offroad F's up the road and pisses off the locals. Keep your IFS. SFA works just fine.
might be marketable to about 10,000 people in the US of A. Subtract the people who don't want a new vehicle, don't want to spend $50K on one, already have a brand loyalty different than Toyota, or only want to buy American, you'll probably be left with about 1,000 people TOPS who would buy such an animal.
THAT IS WHAT WE ARE SAYING.
You can take all the macho, rough and tumble s*** and throw it out the window if you are Toyota USA and are staring at those numbers.
"Hmmmm..... this market has 1,000 dudes. The other one has 50,000."
Which one would you choose? If it's option 'A', you're getting canned.