proper shock angles

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
Jun 8, 2003
Threads
65
Messages
252
Location
Greenville, SC
Can shocks be angled somewhat in the forward/backward direction or do they need to essentially be straight.

I flipped the rear springs in the back (actually had them made flipped so the military wrap would be on the correct side) of my FJ40 so my rear axle is back a few inches from stock. I'm trying to determine whether I need to go to the trouble to move the crossmember that has the top shock mounts backwards or if I can just leave the shocks at a bit of an angle.

*Thanks for the heads up on the pics not showing --- weird, the pictures showed on my computer -- maybe they showed initially and got cached on my computer before Tripod defenses kicked in...



TIA
 
Last edited:
your dampening does decrease as the shock gets angled....

but, many stock trucks angle the shocks forwre/backward ....I suspect it won't hurt

(BTW: your pics don't show.....)
 
I mounted mine inward to accommodate the 12" 5125...

does it make a difference if bilsteins are mounted upside down?

manny 72fj40
 
Bilsteins are designed for shock-boty-up, but can mount either way.

IMO, while yer in there anyways and have LOTS of room to futx with it, get it so you are happy with it....

If that were mine, I'd adjust
 
The biggest problem I see is that it appears that there is only about 3-4 inches of compression left before the shock bottoms out and there is no load on the springs yet. Are you sure they are the correct length?
 
CruisinGA said:
All you need to do to correct the angle is cut off/drill out the old shock mount bolts and weld in some new ones facing backwards. Few hours, problem fixed.


That's what I had planned to do (even bought two new pins), unfortunately it looks like if I do that I will have the same problem but angled the other direction-- will have to relocate the crossmember a little to get correct angle.
 
Pin_Head said:
The biggest problem I see is that it appears that there is only about 3-4 inches of compression left before the shock bottoms out and there is no load on the springs yet. Are you sure they are the correct length?

No I'm not sure they are the correct length...

When I picked the BE5-6250-H5 it was based on a rule of thumb I was told where:

"1/3 of the shocks travel up and 2/3 of shock travel for downward travel ....so if you have 12 inches of travel from the shock you only want about 4in to 5in of the shock shaft showing when truck is on level ground"

My rear mounts have about 25" from pin to pin -- the BE5-6250-H5 has 14.3" of travel and is 20.5" collapsed, which I reasoned should leave 4.25" showing (about 1/3 of shock's travel) at rest on level surface, and leave about 10" for downward travel (about 2/3 of shock's travel).

BUT, as you suggested, I screwed the pooch when I forgot to account for the compression of the suspension at rest with the whole weight of the body/cage--- should have taken some number of inches off my current at rest measurment to account for the weight of the body...

Tuition at Dumbass University ain't cheap ... SHOCKS FOR SALE :D
.
 
Cruiserhaven said:
That's what I had planned to do (even bought two new pins), unfortunately it looks like if I do that I will have the same problem but angled the other direction-- will have to relocate the crossmember a little to get correct angle.

The axle will move back some as the suspension cycles (maybe not a significant enough amount), thus having them slanted a little the other way is not as bad as having them slanted the way they are now.

Or, you could modify the lower shock mounts to space out some to get a vertical shock.

I would avoid modifying/moving the frame crossmember IMO. (might just be me, but I would rather modify things like shock mounts than major frame crossmembers)
 
Simple fix. drill two new holes in the x-member (closer to the center), weld in 2 new pins/bolts facing back, and your good. Your shackle angle shown concerns me more than the shock mounts. You'll get a little bit out of adding the weight of the body and such but I would consider an anti-inversion shackle. Considering the angle at rest now, when your axle falls away it's going to pull that shackle even further forward increasing your chances for inversion.
 
The suspension IS almost at full droop. The shocks are well aligned now but the axle centerline will move back quite a bit as the spring is compressed. The bushings can only accomodate so much missalignment. If left alone it will either wear those bushings out quick or maybe damage the shocks. Assume the stock config was correct. Stock flipped springs move the centerline back ~3.75". Lift springs although longer flat length will be about the same at typical ride height range. So moving the shocks to the back of the cross member will be a bit more than needed to compensate for wheelbase increase? But it should be pretty close to original.
 
What year frame are we looking at?
What lift did you use?

I have a question - can the U-bolt plates where the shocks mount be flipped so they are in front of the axle after you flip the springs? It seems to me that this would tidy things up quite a bit!
 
I moved mine to the back side of the cross-member after reversing the springs. I did some "testing" with a forklift and my shocks would bind up pretty good at full compression.

Sorry I don't have any pics right now.

I made a new bracket from 1.5x1.5x.125 steel. added a new shock pin and notched it for the crossmember then welded it to the crossmember.

I got about 1" of additional height for the shock mount, so I could move it outboard some to get the shock angle more upright.

I used the forlkifts again to get all of my measurements. The shocks I have now are a little short, but I am undecided on what to buy next. I may stay with the DT3000.
 
PabloCruise said:
What year frame are we looking at?
What lift did you use?

I have a question - can the U-bolt plates where the shocks mount be flipped so they are in front of the axle after you flip the springs? It seems to me that this would tidy things up quite a bit!

9/73 frame, 4" spring lift with flipped rear springs and 1.5" shackle lift. I also have the 4+ kit for 2" body lift.

Interesting idea about the u-bolt plate flip. The ones I am using are aftermarket u-bolt skid plates so they taper in the front to make it easier to slide over rocks so it might defeat the purpose with them.

.
 
73lndcrsr said:
I moved mine to the back side of the cross-member after reversing the springs. I did some "testing" with a forklift and my shocks would bind up pretty good at full compression.

Sorry I don't have any pics right now.

I made a new bracket from 1.5x1.5x.125 steel. added a new shock pin and notched it for the crossmember then welded it to the crossmember.

I got about 1" of additional height for the shock mount, so I could move it outboard some to get the shock angle more upright.

I used the forlkifts again to get all of my measurements. The shocks I have now are a little short, but I am undecided on what to buy next. I may stay with the DT3000.

Can you get pictures? I'd really like to see pics and/or drawings you may have with the dimensions of what you fabbed. Sounds like it would be exactly what I need.

:bounce:
 
I found this link in the Tech section. It has alot of useful information in it about how to measure propper shock length for vertical and angled shocks and how far you can really take the angle of the shock for it to still be effective.

http://www.4x4review.com/feature/shock-genius.asp
 
usmcruiser said:
I found this link in the Tech section. It has alot of useful information in it about how to measure propper shock length for vertical and angled shocks and how far you can really take the angle of the shock for it to still be effective.

http://www.4x4review.com/feature/shock-genius.asp


good stuff, thanks

:beer:
 
I will see if I can get some pics today. If the weather will cooperate.

Here is a sketch also.
new shock mount1.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom