- Thread starter
- #101
Yea the 2204 isn’t the highest bandwidth but it’s more than sufficient for a weekend mechanic to view signals on our cars.
if I relied on mechanicing as my primary source of income I would’ve dropped more money to move up their line for more bandwidth.
The best thing about pico is their huge online automotive scope test database. It’ll set up the scope for you (automotive versions), it instructs you on where to place probes and provides sample waveforms for normal conditions as well as all the fault conditions. Which DRASTICALLY increases Diagnostic efficiency
I’ve used my 2204 on ~10 different vehicles that needed scope work and it was the tool that helped me solve all of those problems. Of course you have to know the limitations of your tools which I’m well aware of. But from my perspective the 2204a with 10mhz bandwidth and 1Gs/s sample rate is plenty.
I’d also surmise that it’s easier to set up for a ride along to capture real world data than your bench top unit
Doesn’t mean I don’t respect the OG bench resting o scopes
if I relied on mechanicing as my primary source of income I would’ve dropped more money to move up their line for more bandwidth.
The best thing about pico is their huge online automotive scope test database. It’ll set up the scope for you (automotive versions), it instructs you on where to place probes and provides sample waveforms for normal conditions as well as all the fault conditions. Which DRASTICALLY increases Diagnostic efficiency
I’ve used my 2204 on ~10 different vehicles that needed scope work and it was the tool that helped me solve all of those problems. Of course you have to know the limitations of your tools which I’m well aware of. But from my perspective the 2204a with 10mhz bandwidth and 1Gs/s sample rate is plenty.
I’d also surmise that it’s easier to set up for a ride along to capture real world data than your bench top unit
Doesn’t mean I don’t respect the OG bench resting o scopes