I think that is pretty close to what a lot of us want. I do like MTS and crawl control. They do work remarkably well in some situations. But triple locked is better at the extremes in almost all cases I've experienced with a double (triple equivalent) locked 4R with crawl/mts available. If I had a triple locked model I wouldn't have any heartburn over not having MTS. I'm not sure how to say this nicely - but I'm not sure a lot of american buyers are smart enough/experienced/willing to learn (?) to figure out how to use lockers and would be better off with an automatic system.
I'm surprised it doesn't have ATRAC or MTS only because there's no marginal cost for the software. I figured they'd include in all LC300's as a standard option.
For the USA market - If Toyota built a similar trim with the turbo4 non-hybrid for emissions compliance and added a rear camera (USA requires on all vehicles), I think it would be pretty popular. I tend to think the USA market will prefer the LC250 body styling. I like both, but tend to lean toward the 250 styling myself, although I'd be happy to have either one. I think the extra interior width of the 300 would be nice. My only other wish is for softex material. It's just easier to clean vs cloth with kids and dogs.
The domestic brands seem to be willing to build something like that. It's mostly just Toyota that doesn't offer it. Closest we can get is a base model 4R for $40k and add a pair of e-lockers for maybe another $2500. At $43k, it's not a bad value. But it's also not quite a Land Cruiser either. I guess a base model Tundra Crewmax 4x4 is $46k and add lockers and you'd be at about $50k fully locked. Not a terrible value TBH. But I don't see many people lining up to buy them.