Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I don't see the work vs payout being worth the effort in a spring under setup.
You gain 3" width but you have to widen front springs or cut FJ60 housing up to use FJ55 width.
Strength would be the same as 78+ FJ55 axle(knuckle strength)
I wouldn't do it myself.
I'm running a 4" +/- spring lift with tall and skinny tires. The track looks a bit narrow and I thought that widening the track would make it look better and have it be less tippy. Not that it is tippy, it just looks that way.
.

Rear axle absolutely. You have full float and disc brakes. You've got a third member with bigger carrier bearings than FJ40-FJ62. You've got the larger splined pinion. The "big" problem to me is the electric locker. From what I've heard, if you break an axle shaft in it, you almost have to cut the axle housing apart to get it out![]()
Thanks Dre. That's exactly the picture I was looking for.If you look at pictures of Brian Steen's 55 he ran 60 full floater rear and wheel spacers up front. Here is one more pic of a local 55 with the same setup. The answer is yes it looks awesome... 33 x 10.5 R 15 FJ60 rims
Here you go. Now this is a slick 60 axle swap.
![]()
what pic? i see nothing, not even a redx,
i was going to do 60 axles on mine to get rid of the offset wheels and trunnion bearing issue, but decided if i'm gonna do all the work i might as well hold off and get 80 series axles.