For me, the big difference between the 100s and 80s is the suspension, which is no secret to anyone on here. What exactly are you using for 80s for that warrants more hp? Certainly not off pavement since the 80s with the SAS shines in that department, and you do not need ton of HP for rock crawling. The only legitimate argument for a V8 swap is pulling grade on highway with oversize tires. The only other reasons a 100s might be a better fit if you plan on just doing overland style types of off-roading, meaning you stick with 33-35" tires and a 100s with the v8 and larger platform should out perform an 80s in that department. If you are into rock crawling, you are most likely on 37s or 40s anyways, and unless you have a V8 or diesel swap, you will be riding on the right lane pulling grade and in that case, 100s is out of question. If you are into overlanding, and stick with 35" or smaller tires, a 3-FE or 1FZ-FE will do just fine on the highway, but certainly wont win any races. You pay 80k for a 392 Rubicon, and to run 37" or larger tires, you will need to upgrade your axles, suspension, tires, regear, bumpers etc etc. so will be well over 100k when it is all said and done. $20k on an 80s, put larger tires, a V8 swap, etc etc, you are still looking at half the fraction of buying a new vehicle to essentially performs more or less the same.....Besides, it would be way cooler than a Jeep...