2UZ-FE High Long Term Fuel Trims

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

I’ll get my mechanic to read your post above when he looks at the car in 2 weeks.
With this post I’m curious-
Bank 2 long term fuel trim increases from approx 3.8 to 7.2 after idling for 10 minutes - https://forum.ih8mud.com/threads/bank-2-long-term-fuel-trim-increases-from-approx-3-8-to-7-2-after-idling-for-10-minutes.1349848/post-15711956
Looking at this post, my symptoms are similar. both LTFT’s are bad, but bank 2 is worse.
I do have a 273L long ranger tank. I’m guessing the first people that put this in there did some very long distance trips to the outback. It’s totally possible since 07 for it to have had some bad fuel at some point. K’s are very low, it was only 104,000km when I got it 2 years ago. now at 140,000 km.
I have occaisionally noticed a shudder under acceleration at some speeds between 30-70kmh at some point. very subtle. barely able to describe it.
you also said “It one reason I like watch FT on HWY at around 65MPH.” what are you looking for to be able to tell fuel flow issues in that post?
I guess a fuel flow test will tell us if the pump is stuffed. then I might get the injectors professionally tested to if you think the above tests aren’t good enough. I’ll get them to do vacuum leak tests again too and wet test and leak down.
 
I'm a total amateur, but I dare say that its pretty hard to do a vacuum leak test with my idle being so jumpy. Here is two runs I attempted. Nothing of note, its hard to get any signal from the noise of the rough idle.

 
Your mechanic, can check vacuum: i.e.
Pull a vacuum line, note change or no change RPM.
Propane.
Vacuum gauge.
Smoke test.

Again no vacuum leaks detected. Move to fuel system test.
I don't recall seeing fuel pressure data form test.
Run engine:
Does fuel rail dampeners screw pop up. YES good.
Static:
Pump run from tech stream, engine off. 38 to 44PSI
Engine idling:
38 to 44PSI
Engine off for 5 minutes leak down test. Hold minimum 22PSI

These test do not give flow rate. There is no meter in vehicle flow that. The computer does some calculations, but that's not a mechanical flow test.
One thing I've not tried, and just a thought of. Run a line from fuel filter to a catch can. Run fuel pump from tech stream. Time and measure flow (GPM).

The U.S. 100 series with VVti 2006.2007. Have a known bad fuel pump. It' smaller in size to the 98-05 100 series. No test shows it's bad. Its a driving test that reveals it by stalling. Shops everytime call it a vapor lock. It is not! It is a flow issues, when fuel pump (FP) switches from high speed (high engine RPM, run FP in high speed. By increasing voltage) to low speed (lower engine RPM, reduced voltage to FP).
 
my 2007 200 2uzfe vvti could have one of those fuel pumps possibly. So even a fuel volume test wont show they are bad since its in the transition for low to high rate they stutter? I dont think I notice stalling though, but I might not know. I do notice a shudder if I put my foot down when turning, but that could be traction control, no beeping though like I'd always expect. I used to notice a shudder when accelerating somewhere between 30kmh and 70kmh, but I dont think thats there anymore since my last mechanic fixed a loose spark plug.

I moved interstate recently and will get a new mechanic to do the tests again you have mentioned. They say they have worked on a few 2uz's and get good reviews in google so I hope we find something without it braking the bank.
 
I think with data you've collected: I'd pull fuel filter and inspecting filters backflush.

Fuel flow:

I see in a video, you have a read out of fuel flow. But, AFASK, we have know actual device reading flow (GPM) in 100 series. It's likely calculate based on other data ECM collects.

One thing I don't see, nor do I have equipment for. "Fuel flow". Go back to post #43. In that one which ran lean (LTFT high). I R&R the fuel pump & filter. Fuel trims, came in line for the first time afterwards. It was a fuel flow issue, due to bad gas. It passed all fuel system test, before R&R.

Fuel system test:

When I check fuel pressure and leak down, by the book. This mainly test Fuel Pressure Regulator working within spec, fuel pump creating PSI within spec and leak down pass or fail (all injectors at once).

Your compression test:
No big concerns on cylinder compression. Many engine with similar low compression and, but your differential a bit high.

I see compression above the minimum PSI of 142PSI. But all low, with #1 150PSI & #2 172PSI. Which is fail in differential of 14PSI spec. With a 22PSI differential. I do not see wet test.

I see cylinder leak down test done at ~30PSI. I do them at ~90PSI. I do not see notes on where down leak i.e. rings, valves, head gasket.

We also don't know how fast mechanic to, beginning test after shut down, nor RPM or if he had throttle body wide open. But let us assume, he did by the book.

The differentials in PSI. Tends to make idle a bit rough. BK2 runs leaner (LTFT2 higher by ~4%), BK1 slightly less correcting as shown by LTFT1 to richen mixture. Makes some sense, based on cylinder (compression) balance. This could account for idle not being steady. But until LTFT bought in line. I'd not make to much of idle RPM variance.

Your vacuum test, indicated no vacuum leak: So' id move on to fuel starvation testing.


BTW: Just as a point of interest. The VVTi 4.7l upstream, is actually a A/F sensor, not o2.

FWIW: I'll be running a fuel pressure test & cylinder compression test today. Mostly to collects data.

On a 23,500 miles 2007 LC VVTi. More to collect data, on lowest miles Land Cruiser know in USA. As reference points, but also part of base line restore. Since, super low miles, can and do have issues. Fuel system related issues, mostly.

I'm getting a little "D" vibration, which is talk about in this forum. Engine runs a bit rough at 2,000 RPM (stationary in park). On HWY, at over 4,500 RPM. It has a bit of an oscillating droning sound.

It's, fuels trims are good. But I feel could be a bit better, for engine barely broken in. It may have some spray pattern issues. I'll be sending them out to be tested by FIS. Then we'll know without any doubt.
Idling
View attachment 3824973
View attachment 3824972
Flat HWY steady RPM & speedView attachment 3824971
View attachment 3824977
View attachment 3824978

I'll also R&R fuel filter. Then blowing-out on bench. To see if clean or dirty backflush. The vehicle came from small rural city. Which we see more old gas station, with old metal tanks. If filter, shows signs of dirty fuel. I'll then go deeper and inspect fuel tank/pump.

On this 07LC. I did find one concerning issue. Muck in fuel filler door/cap area. Fuel cap letter unreadable. This points to fuel boiling, where fuel comes out the cap. Which was likely caused by, overfilling gas tanks (100 series 03-07 issues). Which both overfilling & boiling, floods the charcoal canister. The EVAP system can also, cause fuel trims issue.
View attachment 3824979
Don't mean to detract from OPs current FT issue but I'll be very curious to read about the cause of the rougher idle around 2k rpm and over 4500rpm on the low mileage cruiser.
 
I wonder if it were possible to add a sensor to log fuel pressure before / after the regulator, that would be cool. but I'm just nerding out.
 
Speaking to Mentone Toyota who used to service it, their tech advisor said if there is more than 14 psi variance in cylinder compression, its a failed engine and it absolutely could cause high fuel trims because the engine is essentially fighting itself. our variance is 22psi. compression on worst cylinder is 150psi and minimum acceptable is 149, but the variance test fails.
So will I replace with a crate engine or rebuild? This one is not going to be a million mile motor.
 
my 2007 200 2uzfe vvti could have one of those fuel pumps possibly. So even a fuel volume test wont show they are bad since its in the transition for low to high rate they stutter?
These are in 06-07 U.S 100 series 4.7L, fuel pumps. I've no idea which pump you have. You can compare your P/N at www.partsoug.com with your VIN#. To 23220-50160 PUMP ASSY, FUEL W/FILTER 05-2005 thru 08-2007 No test shows them as bad.

I first suspected this issues, reading service history of one 06LC w/200k miles. In where, a shop (Lexus Dealership) from mile 1 to miles 100,000. Could correct, a sattl. What they called vapor lock. Thye tested repeatedly. When I first had a stall (dead stick), I had code reader hooked-up. Read codes, before key off. I saw, BK1&2 lean condition. Formed and tested theory I came up with, while driving that day. I was able to repeat stall condition.
Only driving test, has revealed these bad fuel pumps. In all cases I know, it only after running in high RPM during summer heat.

One could hook up a wireless pressure gauge, and watch. But that doesn't also mean fuel flow (GPM) correct!

I dont think I notice stalling though, but I might not know. I do notice a shudder if I put my foot down when turning, but that could be traction control, no beeping though like I'd always expect. I used to notice a shudder when accelerating somewhere between 30kmh and 70kmh, but I dont think thats there anymore since my last mechanic fixed a loose spark plug.
Misfires or poor running engine, in need of a tune. Can have many caused.

BTW: There is a known, low speed shutter TSB. It deals with under filled A/T, from factory.

I moved interstate recently and will get a new mechanic to do the tests again you have mentioned. They say they have worked on a few 2uz's and get good reviews in google so I hope we find something without it braking the bank.
You have a diagnosable issue. Hard part, is finding someone knows what he's doing and willing to take the time.
Don't mean to detract from OPs current FT issue but I'll be very curious to read about the cause of the rougher idle around 2k rpm and over 4500rpm on the low mileage cruiser.
So don't know yet. It's the lowest "known mileage" 100 series known, in the world. At 23,500 on odometer. Is one I'm working on today!

I do find fuel issues with these, ultra low miles, very often. This is due to, prolong periods of being parked, without running engine. Which can damage fuel injectors (FI) and Fuel pressure regulator (FPR). By rust specks on needles. Filter screen of FI can also have issues.

Here's what I found so far, inspecting this weekend:

Fuel trims good, but balance could be better (variation between BK1 & BK2). It is basically a new engine, barely broken in. So I want to see perfect!

Very likely, has a bad CC:

Fuel filling area mucky/gunky and cap letter not readable. This indicates fuel boiling, due to charcoal canister, being contaminated. Very likely OP, day one, over filled and continued doing so, the fuel tank. 03-06 where CC in back. OM warns never add more fuel, after auto pump handle, auto shut off. Doing so floods CC.

Here's gas fill muck/gunk and cap lettering gone.
IMG_3590.JPEG


Borescope of fill neck. A bit murky/gunky in fill tube. Something I'll be doing more of.
Cap rubber seals, pre these two Air Breathers.holes. Best I can tell, these go to CC assy. At least one does.
Image_2025-01-26 18_59_28_213.JPG

We see a vent hole. Just below cap and breathers holes, just past large open into fill tube.
Image_2025-01-26 18_57_48_973.JPG

looking into, above hole. It's a tube that goes into fuel tank, to vent back to neck near cap.
Image_2025-01-26 18_58_40_892.JPG


Image_2025-01-26 19_01_39_661.JPG



FPR:
FPR, failed test at 46 PSI. PSI over spec (38PSI min, 44PSI max) during static test. PSI varied with Volts from battery. 43.9PSI @ 11.8Volts var up to 46PSI @13.1V. FSM states R&R FPR.

Engine running 41.25PSi @ 13.7V fuel pump pass. I would have like to see 44PSI at 12.5v to 13.7 volt, from very low use fuel pump. May have a sock clog issue, or weak pump. but can be other issue, like EVAP (CC and EVAP VS and lines)

Fuel filter backwash.
Fuel filter backwash, a bit dirtier than one would think, for mileage of less than 24K.

IMG_3690.JPEG



Cylinder compression good.

But BK1 a tad lower than BK2, and less even cylinder to cylinder. Can result in rough idle. These PSI reads, at 5K ft ASL and variation is minor. But I do have, a 2003 w/320 miles very even ~182PSI. So good, I need to retest, as hard to believe.

Also my readings are not sea-level. At sea level, reads would be higher on gauge (factor ~0.86). Also had group 24F battery, I did have charger on, but some cylinder tested AMP/volt and thus RPM a bit low (subjective)
Bk1 1-175, 3-180, 5-175, 7-175.
BK2 2-180, 4-185, 6-182, 8-185
5K' ASL. Batt24F w/charger on at 30AMP (Turned on after #7). Started test, <20 min after ECT hit 87F, for 5 minutes.
Cyl-ECT/RPM: 1-178/200, 3-177/250, 5-179/220, 7-180/192. 2-176/200, 4-175/200, 6-173/200, 8-172/200.
Note ECT highest first (#7) cylinder tested. Ordered i test compression: 7, 5, 3, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8.

Borescope of cylinders revealed:
Some minor vertical scoring, likely from dust. Since only on second air filter, and its seal not curled (common install issue curls them). Air tube, has no signs of dust whatsoever. Intake manifold never offl. Spark plugs the never out. No vacuum leak, all factory hoses. Air pipe, never even removed.
Vertical lines (scoring from dust(sand)
Image_2025-01-26 18_36_41_470.webp


So only way dust could have, entered cylinders. S.A.I. filter failure. Which borescope show filter is not in place. I was surprised at this, with only 24k miles on engine. But then I remembered, the Lexus TSB on GX460 S.A.I. filter recall. Stated. "Possibly filter failure related to moisture". Vehicle lived in, very high humidity. In Gulf Coast area. (Gulf of America (Trump renaming. LOL)

S.A.I. Filter not visible during borescope inspection: May be gone, may find deeper in pump cap. I'll know soon.
Image_2025-01-26 14_08_26_702.JPG

Here's an S.A.I. filter, still in view, as should be.
SAI pump filter good exsample borescope (3).JPG

Note: Sound system speakers are failing. Likely foam rubber disintegrated. Foam on and under engine falls apart like sand (disintegrate). Most likely, regional climate related.

What I'll now do:
Will do the S.A.I. replaceable filter mod. To protect: S.A.I system, engine and CATs.
Timing belt & coolant service & tune up.
OF&L with EPR flush and MOA additive.
More to point of fuel issues;
Will have all 8 FI retested and rebuilt by FIS
Will R&R FPR.
Will R&R CC and its filter.
Will R&R fuel filter.
May look inside fuel tank, depending on how runs after above. So may R&R fuel pump, while in there. Why, may have rust in gas tank. from steel fuel station storage tanks.


Also will I'll be doing a A/T 12 qt fluid flush and set to correct temp/level. A/T temp TSB.
Along with brake, PS, Diffs and TC in flush in baseline.
And more!

I wonder if it were possible to add a sensor to log fuel pressure before / after the regulator, that would be cool. but I'm just nerding out.
Some have seen them added them in ih8mud. Both hardline and wireless. But I've only seen PSI fuel sensors, in mud. No fuel flow.
Speaking to Mentone Toyota who used to service it, their tech advisor said if there is more than 14 psi variance in cylinder compression, its a failed engine and it absolutely could cause high fuel trims because the engine is essentially fighting itself. our variance is 22psi. compression on worst cylinder is 150psi and minimum acceptable is 149, but the variance test fails.
So will I replace with a crate engine or rebuild? This one is not going to be a million mile motor.
Don't toss it out, just yet. Many with weak compression and high differential. Also I'd repeat, test and do additional testing. Borescope, wet test, leak-down with note an where leak. Is compression a heads issue, rings, or both????

Again. I'd inspect S.A.I. filter to help build they why.

When compression low. This may result in unburnt fuel. Which is, also affected by Octane used. But almost always, low compression. Result in a "rich" running condition. These will have, LTFT in the negative. You have something causing a lean condition.

A/T fluid temp, TSB:
 

Attachments

Last edited:
I will pursue more testing with all those suggestions. I also think since my o2 and AFR sensors are nearly 20 years old, I’m thinking of just replacing them, they have probably never been replaced, and if they are even off, but still semi functional it could do this.

My thinking is if they have aged out or deteriated, it would explain how both could be misbehaving, and one slightly more than the other. They wouldn’t degrade at perfectly the same rate. They may also perform differently at different flow rates.

I also realise that from the data we have so far its not enough to just see if AFR (sensor 1) and o2 (sensor 2) are responding together.

they might both move the needle, but if their sensitivity is off then that’s irrelevant that they have a varying signal. We would also see feedback loops where if AFR is off on startup then once once warm (closed loop), theres going to be a response to that, and its not until the response is fed in via the fuel correction that we would see a change in the o2 reading downstream of the AFR sensor.

It might be possible to see that proven if I can reset all my fuel trims and startup, logging everything with bluedriver. but thats just a theory.

Can I reset all my fuel trims perhaps by disconnecting the battery for 60 secs perthaps? Is there a better way in diagnosing AFR sensors or should I just replace them and forget about diagnosing them? I think 18 years is a long enough life for such a sensitive instrument. Even though I know this car had fuel issues at 80,000kms and we are now at 140,000, if the sensors are done I’m flying blind.

Here's another interesting data point, I'm not sure if this is normal:
 
Disconnect battery 20 minutes min.

A/F & O2, do weaken. They also sample oxygen where wires enter. Which, mud and gunk can reduce what air they samples. But in most cases, we get a DTC, if these A/F or o2 bad. Search mud, for how to read these in tech stream.

Leak in exhaust, would also make A/F think running lean (may add oxygen). Which includes leaks from S.A.I. I've seen where the rear S.A.I valves (SW bk1 & SW BK2) to exhaust pipe and pipe to exhaust manifold leak at gasket(s). Due to very poor install, by someone/shop.
 
Disconnect battery 20 minutes min.

A/F & O2, do weaken. They also sample oxygen where wires enter. Which, mud and gunk can reduce what air they samples. But in most cases, we get a DTC, if these A/F or o2 bad. Search mud, for how to read these in tech stream.

Leak in exhaust, would also make A/F think running lean (may add oxygen). Which includes leaks from S.A.I. I've seen where the rear S.A.I valves (SW bk1 & SW BK2) to exhaust pipe and pipe to exhaust manifold leak at gasket(s). Due to very poor install, by someone/shop.
After about 90 secs on cold start, I do hear something shutoff, and its probably a valve, and its a strange sound, like the deep sound a baboon makes. I keep trying to catch it but its elusive in the wild ha.

Is SAI supposed to make a sound when it shuts off? I'll try and catch it.
 
Last edited:
I'm gonna order 2 of each of the sensors, but I was just expecting one type of AFR and one type of o2. 2 types of o2 show up for my VIN search on partsouq. Edit: nevermind I see they are two different part numbers for left and right o2, so one of each. AFR uses the same part number for both sides so I'll get 2 of the AFR. Let me know if I'm wrong. Perhaps if its not possible for o2 to contribute to fuel trim they are unnecesary and I shouldn't bother? according to google both sensor types would contribute to fuel trims but I take that with a grain of salt.


Screenshot 2025-01-30 at 6.40.20 am.png


I also made video here of what happens full throttle - is it normal when full throttle open loop to see 4.7 on both LTFTs or is that just a default value that everyone would see?


I also took the bluedriver out for a spin. it was strange to see the fuel trims glitch out to high negative values and I wonder if that's indicitive of them needing replacement. I've ordered replacements for all o2 and AFR sensors anyway.

 
Last edited:
I think I have found a very useful data point! Or maybe this is just default behaviour.
Reseting fuel trims will always result in a failed start the first time after a reset (reproduced this 3 times). If this is not to be expected, then what are the possible causes? Since we know the ECU says I have a lean condition, I can only suspect one cause here, fuel delivery. I don't believe any unmetered air could cause this on the first start with default parameters (since unmetered air shouldn't matter yet in open loop with no STFT values yet). I also don't believe an exhaust gas leak would cause this, since the ECU shouldn't care about measured o2 at this phase until it gets to use it to update the STFT's. correct me if I'm missing anything.

A question I have - is bank 2 further away on the fuel delivery line? I think it is but its hard to tell what is the input and what is the return line. If its further away on the input it would make sense that it gets worse fuel delivery if flow is not met.

A few days ago since I started monitoring misfires with the scangauge, I saw only one occur on cylinder 2 in about 5x5min short trips. Not sure how normal it is or what to expect. But it got me thinking, if we have misfires due to lean condition (bank 2 is super lean), then what would happen if I reset the fuel trims? I would expect we get a reproducible misfire that way. So I disconnected the positive terminal, and the engine does not ever start on the first attempt! I reproduced this 3 times after resetting the fuel trims. Scangauge doesn't detect this as a misfire. It would make sense after the first start attempt theres enough data for the STFT's to bump up to 13-17ish on bank 2, then on the second start we are gravy.


What do you think about my reasoning here? Are we looking at a fuel delivery issue or is this normal LC200 2UZFE behaviour?
 
Last edited:
I don't think it's relevant. ECU is just resetting, from reset (battery disconnect 20 min) baseline.

Once vacuum leaks if any corrected. Fuel flow & pressure need a very hard look.

IMHO, it is very likely:
1) Fuel follow and or pressure low.
I do not see, as I've mentioned before.
Fuel pressure test, for your 200 series 4.7L engine?

I've no experience with long range fuel tank setup. But must be a consideration, in fuel delivery issues.

As far as misfire:
These are sometimes very hard to detect. Unlees constant, like when no spark or no fuel to a cylinder. Sometimes we've a minor intermittent misfire. It will show in tech stream, then disappears. All these I've seen have been weak coils (COP (coil on spark plug)).

There is a glitch in tech stream, this video from Toyota show the work around.
 
FSM, list of possible cause for to lean:
1. Air induction system
2. Injector blockage
3. Mass Air Flow (MAF) meter
4. Engine Coolant Temperature (ECT) sensor
5. Fuel pressure 6. Gas leakage in exhaust system
7. Open or short in Air Fuel Ratio (A/F) sensor (bank 1 sensor 1)
8. Air Fuel Ratio (A/F) sensor (bank 1 sensor 1)
9. Air Fuel Ratio (A/F) sensor heater (bank 1 sensor )
10. A/F relay 11. A/F sensor heater and A/F relay circuits
12. Ventilation hose connections
13. Ventilation valve and hose
14. ECM

Misfire detected:
1. Open or short in engine wire harness
2. Connector connection
3. Vacuum hose connection
4. Ignition system
5. Fuel injector
6. Fuel pressure
7. Mass Air Flow (MAF) meter
8. Engine Coolant Temperature (ECT) sensor
9. Compression pressure
10. Valve clearance
11. Valve timing
12. Ventilation hose connections
13. Ventilation valve and hose
14. ECM
 
Thanks for that list. I'm going to start by doing fuel pressure and fuel flow myself at the moment. I recall you had a kit like this:
which I can order, just not sure what else to get to plumb it in to test things like the fuel rail, fuel pressure regulator, and pump. I see you had some spares to achieve this:
I might need to order them (I'm living on an island in Queensland, Australia)
 
That is the kit I have. But notice how I connect (tap) at fuel filter, in link you provided. I made the tap, from old used fuel line.
 
Last edited:
I wanted to do a little test at idle to see if disconnecting the vacuum hose from the fuel pressure regulator would increase pressure (even if I can't measure it yet while I wait for my kit) and therefore decrease AFR on the STFT, just as a rough test.
I would have expected to see it go richer, and I also was expecting to feel some vacuum with my finger on the vacuum port connected to the air box, but none of those things were present. Do you think we should expect to see a change in fuel trims / AFR when we do this? It doesn't look like the fuel pressure regulator has ever been touched in 18 years / 140,000 kms.

I tried to look up this hose in the FSM, but couldn't find anything to describe how to check if the vacuum hole from the air box is actually drawing anything.
 
Last edited:
IDK. I had vacuum line off FPR, once by accident. It was on a new purchase, I pick-up. I drove about 1,000 miles to get home. No noticeable effect.
FPR test, is a fail if goes over 44PSI, engine off, running pump through tech stream.

I don't recall if you ever stated: Was intake manifold ever removed?
Like for a starter R&R, S.A.I pump or SW service or R&R, knock sensor issues, wire chew by rodents, etc.?

I pointed, with an arrow in a picture. At the throttle body wire housing block. Asking why was, its cover boot missing?

While waiting for fuel pressure gauge:

You may want to try, a vacuum leak test again. This time watch RPMs, watching for any change in RPM. Move a little slower around engine with your bottle gas (carb CLN, NAP gas, propane), as you look for any leak point.

Typically with a vacuum leak. Idle is rough and MPG low. RPM may smooth and increase, with the momentary reduction in vacuum leak as gas sucked in. RPMs may also decrease. So listen and watch for any change in RPM. Watching fuel trims, they may not react fast enough for your scanner to pick-up on.
 
I looked through records and the throttle body was cleaned 2 years back. I also seem to recall seeing my last mechanic remove the intake manifold for something while he was investigating the lean condition, but not sure why - I was less familiar with terminology then so its hard to remember.

I will do another vacuum leak test.
Is there any harm in removing the hose between the PCV valve and the throttle body and blocking that on the intake side while idling too to observe changes in AFR?
I'm also guessing a busted pcv valve (open) would not be easy to find a vacuum leak with propane from but still cause a lean condition, and from my understanding the pcv valve and that whole line is responsible for producing the vacuum for the port on the air cleaner hose. so I want to follow that line of investigation too.

I suspect the PCV valve has never been replaced, and its service life is about the same as the point where my uncle got the car and knew it was always thirsty from day one - 80,000 kms. I've ordered one and a set of hoses for it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom