Hey there is 2 data points!
So the Tools method has quite a variance.
I have personally read several of those posts where his numbers change. My guess is there is a sweet spot for each 80 and it just depends,might even be different depending on what bearings one buys.
For me fsm is spot on and for others who winged it and failed and then went fsm it was spot on.
Ive never had any doubt about Tools r us being skilled but assuming anyone else is as average as me ,i recommend the fsm.
I do get what your saying about shear but my guess is that its quantifiable and doesnt add up to much in the way of torque values.
So the Tools method has quite a variance.
I have personally read several of those posts where his numbers change. My guess is there is a sweet spot for each 80 and it just depends,might even be different depending on what bearings one buys.
For me fsm is spot on and for others who winged it and failed and then went fsm it was spot on.
Ive never had any doubt about Tools r us being skilled but assuming anyone else is as average as me ,i recommend the fsm.
I do get what your saying about shear but my guess is that its quantifiable and doesnt add up to much in the way of torque values.