That’s assuming KDSS won’t start having failures as well. One recent post indicated a front cylinder failure and it was not cheap to fix. Personally I think it’s a matter of time until KDSS starts becoming at least something to think about with regard to reliability. As it is, at least AHC specifies a fluid change interval. KDSS appears to be a “sealed for life” system and I fundamentally think that is a bad idea.
While few of us know anything about working on the system, I trust people here to figure it out. And yes the parts should be cheaper than the pumps and control systems on AHC, but I caution people against assuming KDSS won’t have its own headaches eventually.
Plus.. not many LX570s with “cruiser lean”
Totally agree, but then I wouldn' t think twice about cutting out the KDSS system when it gets to a point of failure you could still cut away or disconnect the KDSS system and have a fully functional suspesion you may have to tweak the spring rate or mount a traditional swaybar later but I think it would function similar to an 80 without the swaybars in my primitive thinking. I did't run swaybars on my 80.