Cottonland Hunting/Shooting Thread

[wngrog]

"Looks crowded" is funny.

I assume y'all crack these cases open and pretend like you are working on something but really you are just displaying your toy.

If that is the case, I think it looks fine. May be overly heavy but it looks Fine.

If the case is deep enough you can layer the duplicate mags and (gulp) surpressors but then the masses would feel sorry for you and think you only had one

 

[jynx]

That is probably the best line of thinking. Most guys do use the case as a "display" for the toys, I on the other hand just need to carry my junk around. I agree it will probably be a little heavy, but the case itself is already heavy so I will just have to deal with that.

Thanks

 

[FJ60Cam]

A couple of guitar cases would be pretty sweet.

 

[tcb]

I hope you guys don't mind, but I web wheel over here alot and wanted some opinions.

I picked up a Pelican 1750 to carry some of my "sporting rifles" and after playing with it some I was able to get two rifles and a 1911 in it but I'm afraid it feels crowded. Everything has at least an inch of clear space around it for foam. Thoughts..
View attachment 1045026

I want to use the space wisely, but don't want to overdo it. The 20" barrel, scope and fixed stock makes the black gun a space hog but I would like to carry both rifles in the case. I pulled the scope off, but it takes up more space when off then it does on due to it needing space around it.

Appreciate any input.

Also, saw that the ATF has tabled the M855 discussion for the time being, but will have to keep an eye out to make sure they don't try to slide something by us.

@tcb what are you going to use for your 3rd gun? I got a buddy that has gotten into 3gun shooting. Looks like alot of fun.

I generally don't that much stuff in one case. I have a glock 34 right now that I'd run but have half ass been looking for a CZ Or 2011 of some variety.

 

[wngrog]

Buzz and I went Beaver hunting tonight. The mosquitoes were unbearable.

 

[wngrog]

 

[fj40charles]

this guy is an attorney selling his gun trusts so take it for what it is worth..

http://www.myguntrust.com/are-nfa-gun-trusts-being-eliminated.html

Under the ATF’s proposed rule change change, the ATF will continue to require proof that a valid NFA gun trust exists, i.e., a complete copy of the NFA gun trust. However, the ATF is also going to require proof that each “responsible person” on an NFA gun trust provide proof that they are entitled to possess firearms. Specifically, after the ATF’s proposed rule change goes into effect, the ATF will then require each and every settlor and trustee to submit fingerprints, photographs, and approval from the chief law enforcement officer in the settlor’s or trustee’s county of residence on a new ATF form that has not been published.

The problem is that it is unclear whether the chief law enforcement officer in the settlor’s or trustee’s county of residence will sign the ATF’s proposed new form. If not, then law-abiding gun owners in the chief law enforcement officer’s county will be prevented from exercising their constitutional right to own NFA firearms that are not prohibited by Federal, state, or local law merely at the whim of the chief law enforcement officer. Due to the addition of a local chief law enforcement officer approval requirement, the ATF’s proposed rule change (in its present form) appears to be designed to prevent law-abiding gun owners in many areas from owning NFA firearms, even if they are not prohibited by state or local law.

 

[MScruiser]

No sense paying for a NFA trust, when there are so many free copies out in the wild.

If anyone is SERIOUSLY interested in one, I have one my NFA lawyer and friend wrote for me 5 or so years ago. Just PM me.

 

[jynx]

@wngrog been drone hunting today?

 

[wngrog]

 

[wngrog]

Beaver hunt

 

[tcb]

this guy is an attorney selling his gun trusts so take it for what it is worth..

http://www.myguntrust.com/are-nfa-gun-trusts-being-eliminated.html

Under the ATF’s proposed rule change change, the ATF will continue to require proof that a valid NFA gun trust exists, i.e., a complete copy of the NFA gun trust. However, the ATF is also going to require proof that each “responsible person” on an NFA gun trust provide proof that they are entitled to possess firearms. Specifically, after the ATF’s proposed rule change goes into effect, the ATF will then require each and every settlor and trustee to submit fingerprints, photographs, and approval from the chief law enforcement officer in the settlor’s or trustee’s county of residence on a new ATF form that has not been published.

The problem is that it is unclear whether the chief law enforcement officer in the settlor’s or trustee’s county of residence will sign the ATF’s proposed new form. If not, then law-abiding gun owners in the chief law enforcement officer’s county will be prevented from exercising their constitutional right to own NFA firearms that are not prohibited by Federal, state, or local law merely at the whim of the chief law enforcement officer. Due to the addition of a local chief law enforcement officer approval requirement, the ATF’s proposed rule change (in its present form) appears to be designed to prevent law-abiding gun owners in many areas from owning NFA firearms, even if they are not prohibited by state or local law.

I'm hoping that with the ATF's head assclown stepping down due to the M855 flap, that rule 41p will die along with his career.

 

[wngrog]

Blew more s*** up today

 

[tcb]

you know you are going to end up buying an AR of some variety...

 

[wngrog]

Yes. I'm still waiting on some friend selling me one tricked out .50 on $1

I found out my .40 won't set off the exploding targets

 

[tcb]

Yes. I'm still waiting on some friend selling me one tricked out .50 on $1

I found out my .40 won't set off the exploding targets

i buy all of them i find at 50 cents on the dollar.

 

[wngrog]

AR10 recoil

 

[tcb]

I sighted my 308 AR on your land some years ago.. You had zero interest in them at the time.

 

[wngrog]

I've got marginal interest now. I like the thought of owning one more than shooting one.

 

[fj40charles]

I've got marginal interest now. I like the thought of owning one more than shooting one.

If I lived on that much land and had a place to shoot what I wanted, I'd have a .50 BMG.