Clutch fork side and disengagement- does it matter?

[3_puppies]

@cruisermatt makes a billet replacement that is pretty slick looking. It also gives a better comparison view of how the fore/aft position is different from the rusty driver's side photo I've got shown above:

View attachment 4128209

are you keeping the slave on the driver side? not sure that bracket will work, the bracket looks like a remake of a stock bracket

in the very first pic showing the pivot and fork, the pivot ball looks angled, not parallel with the trans shaft, looks like the fork is then more inward on the throw out hub,

 

[Kmehr]

are you keeping the slave on the driver side? not sure that bracket will work, the bracket looks like a remake of a stock bracket

in the very first pic showing the pivot and fork, the pivot ball looks angled, not parallel with the trans shaft, looks like the fork is then more inward on the throw out hub,

yes we're going to get it moved back to the passenger side. Ideally we are going to use the stock bracket, if we can find it (either myself or the installer has misplaced it). I mostly included that bracket from Cruisermatt to show the difference in the fore/aft position from where the slave mounts on the driver's side. We probably won't be able to reuse the frame to bell housing mount, but can make up for it with gussets on the transmission crossmember/skid plate.