- Thread starter
- #81
![]()
The pictured spacer is from F engine.
The 2F spacer would have been a better choice because :
It is open plenum.
There is no PCV tube in the front.
There is a heat insulator shield that covers up most of the headers near the TB.
Interesting... That was what was on it when I got it... wait or was it... I think I might have swapped some thing around when I first got both 40s. Long story short I got 2 40s at the same time, 1 a 71, the other a 79 that was a rusted fiberglass mess. It didn't have the room for both so I had a week at a space where I hacked the 79 up for it's parts and tried to put it all into the 71. Epic Fail! I will have to go look at the F motor in storage and see if it isn't there. The heat shield was hacked to pieces already by the PO. I don't think that I need to worry too much about heat with these headers. They are ceramic coated inside and out which should take care of a lot of heat problems, at least that is what is advertised about ceramic header coatings. Think my time and money is better spent cutting this spacer open or just get one for a 2f. For that matter what about the adapter plate being 2 barrel and not open? Downey sure is sounding better and better.
