Hey Sampak, I am a scientist and I welcome 'those' questions! The flames of scrutiny temper us, right?
I did a lot of research before digging into this, and when I calculated the power to weight ratio of the OM617 + R151f vs the 3F-E + the A440 I was within ~5%; (granted with pretty rough numbers, using 140hp for max on OM617 and 160hp max for 3F-E).
Then when you factor in the parasitic loss (some estimate 25-30%!, is this realistic?) of the Awd Auto, I would, at worst, have more usable power than I do currently.
I cannot afford a H55, and though it is mega-stout; I think it is over-engineered for this application, and I won't likely be turning 37's. I also had the R151f/xfer in the garage, and the OM617 in my old man' s garage.
I would also massively simplify the vehicles design, eliminating EFI and the dependency of electricity for locomotion.
I currently reside in the PNW where OM617's are cheap and abundant, and yes, massively reliable. (The 3F-E is very reliable as well (mine had 155-160psi on all 6 with 271k on the clock), but I got 11.9 mpg ALL of the time. It was very uncanny, even the magic screw (fuel pressure dampener) could not work it's 15mpg mojo)
I cannot afford a 4bt, nor all of the related accoutrements and power-upgrades for the truck to tolerate such a beast.
It also seems that if a UniMog platform can be successful with a OM617 that the FJ80 platform would do just fine.
Also, as a scientist, I am pretty stupidly patient, and have no need to rush into traffic or to issue gobs of torque suddenly into the drivetrain. I have been driving an auto 22re 4runner for the last 3 years, so pretty much anything else is faster off of the line.
All this being said, this is an experiment, and I have yet to get a set of real world numbers from this rig, but it will be interesting to see the result.