550 / 250 or an Inoes?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Ineos would've had to cheap out on nearly everything to hit that price point.

No Recaro seats.
No Brembo brakes.
No Eibach springs.
No Bilstein shocks.
No bespoke Tremec gear drive transfer case (chain drives are cheaper).
No 1 ton sized steering components.
No rust-proof aluminum hood and all 6 doors.
No kingpin front knuckles (ball joints are cheaper).
No roof you can walk on (no rack needed).
No 7700lb towing capacity.
No etc, etc...

Three or four years ago they might have been able to hit that number but not at today's raw material and manufacturing prices.


That's all I drive. SO much easier to diagnose issues and do repairs. Cheaper too. They handle just fine on the highway. Ask any full-sized HD pickup driver. I have several solid axle vehicles with a combined highway mileage of almost 400K miles between them and I've never had any issue of any kind. I intend to keep them another 20 years. Show me a tin-can SUV that can do that. I need 4WD for snow and dirt roads in winter. I'm not going to Moab in my 3/4 ton diesel.




Unless Toyota brings the 70 series to the US - which is never happening - you're stuck with renovating a 25+ year old vehicle and almost 45 yr with an actual 60. It will cost you as much as a Grenadier even if you do a lot of the work yourself (what's your time worth?). You'll mostly be painting/powdercoating over old, tired metal like your frame and axle housings and you still won't have a warranty when your done.

Ineos has done a pretty good job of giving you what you're asking for. Not perfect. But damn close. I think their vehicle is probably better built than a 60. It weighs more than 1500lbs more than a 60 and it's half aluminum. Airbags, antilock brakes, and greek columns for the A,B,C,D pillars. They tried to keep 16" wheels but they wanted bigger brakes so they chose to go 17s. At least they're not twenties.

No, they didn't put in a manual which is also a negative in my book. It is just more efficient to use a modern computer controlled auto that always has the engine running in it's most environmentally-friendly rpm range. Other markets are getting a manual and a non-hybrid engine in the new 250 but not us so that sort of tells the tale. I'd also rather have manual windows but I was told that manual window regulators are heavy compared to a small electric motor and a wire. The Ineos already weighs in at 5800 lbs! The new 250 better be built like a tank.
No need to renovate my 1987 FJ60. I just keep driving it, atleast in the summer when it isn’t buried under a huge pile of snow. It just keeps trucking.
 
Last year our recovery group members put a collective 180,000 miles on their rigs responding to recoveries that commercial tow companies refused to service. We had a recovery the other night involving an modified FJ Cruiser, a basically stock Tacoma and a stock F-150. The Toyota's got stuck going up a snow covered trail they should never have been on and the F-150 was a Sheriff's Deputy truck trying to rescue the occupants of the Toyota's. Our recovery group consisted of a Power Wagon on 37's, a JK on 35's, an XJ on 35's and my 80 series on 35's. We recovered two Search and Rescue vehicles (they were activated due to the number of people isolated and because a Sheriff's vehicle was involved) before we even got to the trailhead. Because snow was falling and conditions were deteriorating fast, just getting to the vehicles required chaining up. At the site, snow was 1.5-2.0 feet deep and still falling. All of the recovered vehicles were pointed the wrong direction an we were unable to get around them. As such, we had to turn them around where they sat. Due them also being IFS, we could only chain up the rear axle of the recovered vehicles as there was no clearance on the front end for chains. It was a long night, but everyone got off the mountain safe and sound. I've considered making my wife's 100 series our next off-road/recovery rig, but it would need to become a SFA rig first.
Sounds like that's a case of an inexperienced drivers taking their rigs where they never should have gone :). Did they have any legitimate need to go there, or where they just wheeling for run?

I'd never take my rig in 1.5 ft of snow, frankly if I had a SFA rig on 37s I'd stay at home too to not but myself at risk or others at risk trying to rescue me. Either way, you can't make the argument that "IFS is not good" when the driver's grossly exceeded the capability of their vehicles.

Edit: For the record, I totally agree that SFA is a stronger and more capable for hardcore wheeling. My argument is that IFS is better in just about every other situation, and that's where my rig and most of the rigs on this forum spend the vast majority of their miles.
 
Last edited:
You can buy them all day long at $60k. Maybe ineos can be negotiated down too. Not sure. Just looking at real world prices, you can also get a base model diesel RAM or Ford hd solid axle 4x4 crew cab for about $55k and add lockers to get pretty similar capabilities for about $60k. For $70k it would be easy to setup a new base f250 or Powerwagon with lockers, snorkel, winch, 37s, ready to go explore.


Either F250 or a Power Wagon would be way too big for trails east of the 100th meridian. Lots of potential for body damage and whacking trees, as well as extensive pinstriping. Putting one on 37s would make it even worse (you should see how rough the clearcoat is on the top of my GX from branches) Maybe out west where the trails are bigger they'd be fine, but I'd honestly pick a Jeep for a wheeling rig over a HD truck (as they're basically the same size as a 4Runner/GX).

I also don't know where you are seeing diesels for $55k, around here it's hard to touch a gas model for under $60K and diesels are $70K+.
 
No need to renovate my 1987 FJ60. I just keep driving it, atleast in the summer when it isn’t buried under a huge pile of snow. It just keeps trucking.

And you'll work on it all the time. I'm well aware of what it takes to keep an older rig on the road. There's no way to deny the age of those vehicles. 40s, 45s, 55s, & 60s are nothing special in that regard. They rust if take them through the car wash. You have to keep a stash of obsolete parts in the back of the shop. They require constant tinkering and adjustmnt because they were designed that way. I've had my share and still daily a 40. They were never made to the standards that POS subarus are today. We love them in spite of their faults.

And for those that are afraid an Ineos offering will be made in low numbers, just remember that there were only about 5000 fj40s sold in North America per year. That was back when Toyota was still a fairly small company. Should no one have bought them?
 
And you'll work on it all the time. I'm well aware of what it takes to keep an older rig on the road. There's no way to deny the age of those vehicles. 40s, 45s, 55s, & 60s are nothing special in that regard. They rust if take them through the car wash. You have to keep a stash of obsolete parts in the back of the shop. They require constant tinkering and adjustmnt because they were designed that way. I've had my share and still daily a 40. They were never made to the standards that POS subarus are today. We love them in spite of their faults.

And for those that are afraid an Ineos offering will be made in low numbers, just remember that there were only about 5000 fj40s sold in North America per year. That was back when Toyota was still a fairly small company. Should no one have bought them?
Well I’ve owned it since 1987, drove about 20k miles a year for the first 12 years I owned it (until replaced by a new 100 in late 1998) and now I drive it occasionally for fun. Not much in the way of rust except for rock chips even though it lives about 50 feet from the Pacific Ocean. Only challenges I have are with the stupid choke cable kinking frequently and the leaky exhaust manifold. And my windshield looks like someone shot it with a shotgun. Original powertrain. 3rd clutch I think. It has been a great vehicle.

Around here there are a fair number of 60s and a few 55s being daily driven. We have some good mechanics.
 
Toyota builds a LC70 for less than that.

I'm not sure a boutique small volume coach builder could do it at that price. But it's definitely very doable for a efficient manufacturer. I'm not sure there's many buyers though. Those buyers grab a LC70 globally or a domestic HD truck in the USA. You can buy a new RAM Powerwagon for $60k right now. Ineos would have tough time competing in that market.

I am under the impression that a 76 series is substantially more than that and, again, you can't get it new here. Ever.

They are a throwaway vehicle in hard use markets like Africa and South America. Their roofs collapse like tin foil origami. The junk yards are littered with them in third world countries. The track widths front to rear are completely different and nobody likes driving them for any distance without aftermarket seating.

Would I buy one? Absolutely! But I can't. That's why I looked at the Ineos. Most Mudders should probably stick with the 250 to avoid the flames. 😁
 
Most mudders don’t buy new cars anyway so not sure why we even having this conversation.
 
I am under the impression that a 76 series is substantially more than that and, again, you can't get it new here. Ever.

They are a throwaway vehicle in hard use markets like Africa and South America. Their roofs collapse like tin foil origami. The junk yards are littered with them in third world countries. The track widths front to rear are completely different and nobody likes driving them for any distance without aftermarket seating.

Would I buy one? Absolutely! But I can't. That's why I looked at the Ineos. Most Mudders should probably stick with the 250 to avoid the flames. 😁
It's actually way less than $60k starting price in Japan. Base model is $32,343 USD.

Toyota Re-introduces the Land Cruiser "70" in Japan | Toyota | Global Newsroom | Toyota Motor Corporation Official Global Website - https://global.toyota/en/newsroom/toyota/40139890.html (base MSRP is at the bottom).

A base model lc76 with the 2.8L diesel for $33k would sell faster than they could ever supply them in the USA market.

Australia prices are inclusive of a lot of taxes and fees that wouldn't normally be part of MSRP.
 
It's actually way less than $60k starting price in Japan. Base model is $32,343 USD.

Toyota Re-introduces the Land Cruiser "70" in Japan | Toyota | Global Newsroom | Toyota Motor Corporation Official Global Website - https://global.toyota/en/newsroom/toyota/40139890.html (base MSRP is at the bottom).

A base model lc76 with the 2.8L diesel for $33k would sell faster than they could ever supply them in the USA market.

Australia prices are inclusive of a lot of taxes and fees that wouldn't normally be part of MSRP.
True. It’d rearrange the market segment.

Global market base spec prices always offer a painful perspective US LC trims and pricing. More enthusiasts should understand that difference.
 
Either F250 or a Power Wagon would be way too big for trails east of the 100th meridian. Lots of potential for body damage and whacking trees, as well as extensive pinstriping. Putting one on 37s would make it even worse (you should see how rough the clearcoat is on the top of my GX from branches) Maybe out west where the trails are bigger they'd be fine, but I'd honestly pick a Jeep for a wheeling rig over a HD truck (as they're basically the same size as a 4Runner/GX).

I also don't know where you are seeing diesels for $55k, around here it's hard to touch a gas model for under $60K and diesels are $70K+.
The grenadier is about 3 inches narrower. That matters in some places. Just depends a on the terrain. The grenadier isn't exactly a compact trail weapon. The wheelbase matters too.

In North America there aren't many places that Ive been that a grenadier on 31.5s would go that a Powerwagon on 37s wouldn't. But I can think of a lot where the PW would go where the grenadier wouldn't.

Neither one would be my choice. Mostly just pointing to available HD trucks with solid axles available for 60k as a reference that it is possible to manufacturer for that price point. The $32,500 base lc76 is probably the better example. Either way - very doable for a major mfg to build at that price.
 
The grenadier is about 3 inches narrower. That matters in some places. Just depends a on the terrain. The grenadier isn't exactly a compact trail weapon. The wheelbase matters too.

In North America there aren't many places that Ive been that a grenadier on 31.5s would go that a Powerwagon on 37s wouldn't. But I can think of a lot where the PW would go where the grenadier wouldn't.

Neither one would be my choice. Mostly just pointing to available HD trucks with solid axles available for 60k as a reference that it is possible to manufacturer for that price point. The $32,500 base lc76 is probably the better example. Either way - very doable for a major mfg to build at that price.
On our trails here, it literally comes down to snaking between trees with a few inches on each side, and often above. The HD truck literally won't fit unless you break out the chainsaw and start clearing. Most of our wheeling around here is down by side-by-sides, so the trails are getting narrower and narrower. I carry a M18 sawzall in my GX and have had to break it out and clear on numerous occasions.
 
Its crazy for me coming from an open desert without trees to even imagine how you guys fit those large land cruisers in those forest trails crawling up those big rocks.
Definitely wouldn't be my first choice but I see how the more challenging it is - the funner it can be.
 
You guys would probably like the Y61 Patrol and LC70 for those tight trails.

A J71 with lockers is like a mountain goat.
The old 3rd gen 4Runners, 1st gen Tacomas etc, and other smaller Toyotas do really well in those types of trails, along older Jeeps like the XJ, TJ, etc. Newer Jeeps are basically the same size as the 120/150 platform, while the Gladiator is quite a bit bigger. I pretty rarely see full-size trucks on our trails, when I do they are total beaters. It's literally 75%+ side-by-sides on our trails here (which - for giggles - are IFS and IRS :)).

My 120 does fit, it's just often tight and I have tons of pinstripes, plus I need to cut trees or snake through very carefully.
 
...I see a lot folks on the internet who claim to want “simpler” vehicles from the “good old days”. To quote my late father-in-law, what was so good about them? I learned to drive in a 1969 Ford Falcon with manual steering, unassisted 4-wheel drum brakes, bias ply tires, and an anemic straight six...
I learned to drive a manual 1960 Falcon. It was redone by 1986. the 389 was smooth and the Hurst 4 speed was awesome. Rough go for the first few startups. That was a race car, compared to my 1971 Cutlass Supreme.
 
Last week in Scottsdale, the Barrett Jackson auctions were held. People arrived from all over the globe in Gulfstreams to buy hundreds of millions of dollars in old cars and trucks. They didn’t seem to think these old cars and trucks sucked at all.

I saw two INEOS Grenadiers there and they looked impressive. I am going to arrange a test drive.
 
Last edited:
Last week in Scottsdale, the Barrett Jackson auctions were held. People arrived from all over the globe in Gulfstreams to buy hundreds of millions of dollars in old cars and trucks. They didn’t seem to think these old cars and trucks sucked at all.

I saw two INEOS Grenadiers there and they looked impressive. I am going to arrange a test drive.
I'm sure a very, very small percentage of those cars are being daily-driven. Most will likely sit in climate-controlled storage other than the occasional cruise or car show.

My high-school ride was a 1972 Chevy C-10 (ochre and white with a hopped-up 350 probably making similar power as my hopped-up 2UZ-FE :)). Fun truck at the time but I have zero interest in daily-driving anything older than the mid-90s. I remember a passenger once hitting their head on the dashboard when I had to do a panic stop due to it having only lap belts. I later put a set of junkyard 3-point belts in it out of a S10, but either way old vehicles are pretty unsafe.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure a very, very small percentage of those cars are being daily-driven. Most will likely sit in climate-controlled storage other than the occasional cruise or car show.
I thought it was only in Europe that people were inclined to DD vintage cars because many consider it chic to do so. But Scottsdale is full of gorgeous collector cars on the roads as well. I was in the Bay Area recently and the same thing is true. Saw a Speedster on the Golden Gate Bridge. I have never been to Missouri so maybe things are different there.
 
I thought it was only in Europe that people were inclined to DD vintage cars because many consider it chic to do so. But Scottsdale is full of gorgeous collector cars on the roads as well. I was in the Bay Area recently and the same thing is true. Saw a Speedster on the Golden Gate Bridge. I have never been to Missouri so maybe things are different there.
We have lots of car shows and a robust car culture, but they generally aren't daily driven outside of a special occasions. Beyond the safety considerations, I would not want to risk an irreplaceable classic getting hit by a distracted driver anyway.
 
Back
Top Bottom