It's not a vapor lock issue. It is weak fuel pressure/flow from fuel pump. Due to increased resistance (heat). The condition always reveals itself in the same way. Which replacing the factory fuel pump, always corrects.
Symptom of bad fuel pump, in 06-07 100 series:
After running engine in higher RPM. Like when ascending a pass or passing on the HWY. Almost but not always, on a hot day. As we let off the gas pedal, engine RPMs drop. At that moment, as ECM switch fuel pump to low speed. Via, pass current through fuel pump resistor. Which resistor, reduces volts/AMPs to fuel pump, to slow it's speed. Fuel pump fails to deliver adequate fuel pressure/flow.
you know what bothers me Paul, when you don't take into account fuel make up, specifically 2026 fuel make up compared to 2000 or 1995.
That you pair fuel pressure with flow rate. Stating that all vapor lock is due to flow rate/pressure, when it is not.
Do you have a block temp chart relative to return to tank fuel volume? The pressure is zero on return unless the fuel tank is pressed also.
Can you chart initial boiling point of current e10 make up, state dependent, vendor dependent, ambient dependent?
What happens if we load up with e15, is the 100 going to do fine with a radiator wash and a new fuel pump?
This implication is a cheap shot maybe, but you imply that e10 is fine, and same-same all years, and the 100s can handle it.
So when people fuel up with e15, what the answer going be then?
Do whatever it takes to keep rail, line, and tank temps below 165F, maintain rail pressure at 38 hot ambient and you'll be fine. Flow rate doesn't matter, The resistor is an inhibitor. (I'd write 38psig hot 42 psig cold but that's redundant) Brosche or Hitachi will tell you when the light come on. Then and only then will you realize, and be outside of the mechanical limits of correction to maintain Stoichiometric.
Saying flow rate doesn't matter is provided you don't get above or below a 25% threshold to trigger an hi/lo CEL.