Anyone in here know this rig?
2003 Land Cruiser
2003 Land Cruiser
100 Series General Tech and Classifieds
- Thread starter wngrog
- Start date
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
DNP bought the 300k 2000 from him. Was advertised as never in mud, I beg to differ. Although he did just replace the front lower control arms and rear 3rd member with new oem parts. The ARB was on the 2000, he pulled the ol switch-aroo. That said the bumper that was put on DNP's was pretty rusty unlike the rest of the truck. If you would like I would be more than happy to go check it out for you.
Thank you sir!
He's a little high on price, and I don't care much for the ARB. If I can work something out with him I may take you up on that..
- Thread starter
- #4,807
Get me a measurement. I know you got that big ass gas tank, but I want to compare it to Braswell's numbers
Center dash and shifter (looks like 4 speed) suggest '02 or earlier...
Just looked at the ad following JTTMFT's post, and he's exactly right: center dash, shifter, steering wheel, road wheels, and roof rack are all pre-'03
- Thread starter
- #4,812
I just had a nice talk with Christo about springs.
He is sending me some SOF2RH for the rear. He says they are the rate of 863 but 1" lower. I think that is what Braswell and Bomar have. Christo says 22" you guys are taller. Will see.
He's no fan of Foam cell. Im still sold on them.
I'm basically sitting at stock height. On 34's and heavy. I think I'm just too low and heavy. All the "progressive" in my spring is used up.
He is sending me some SOF2RH for the rear. He says they are the rate of 863 but 1" lower. I think that is what Braswell and Bomar have. Christo says 22" you guys are taller. Will see.
He's no fan of Foam cell. Im still sold on them.
I'm basically sitting at stock height. On 34's and heavy. I think I'm just too low and heavy. All the "progressive" in my spring is used up.
- Thread starter
- #4,814
He says they heat up and fail.
Ironman says they do better in the heat and heavy use.
My seat of the pants eval says the Pro's are 100% better shocks all around.
He said he had long talk with OME at SEMA and said their shocks are too stiff.
He says they are looking into a softer option for lighter vehicles (no bumpers etc)
Ironman says they do better in the heat and heavy use.
My seat of the pants eval says the Pro's are 100% better shocks all around.
He said he had long talk with OME at SEMA and said their shocks are too stiff.
He says they are looking into a softer option for lighter vehicles (no bumpers etc)
I have OMEs all the way around and I don't feel they are too stiff at all. TJM front bumper, no winch, factory rear bumper.
Sent from my HTCONE
You have Nitrochargers or Nitrocharger SPORTS? When available, the original Ns worked well. The sports the PO installed on my 100 gave me the same sensation as having a steel bar welded between the frame and the suspension.