I def don’t disagree but I wouldn’t argue the 250 absolutely nailed it in the looks department. Or the angles/clearance/factory-ready 4x4 department.Plus you get worse headroom and a bromobile appearance.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I def don’t disagree but I wouldn’t argue the 250 absolutely nailed it in the looks department. Or the angles/clearance/factory-ready 4x4 department.Plus you get worse headroom and a bromobile appearance.
I think it's pretty damn good looking. The off road worthiness was always going to be somewhat limited to efficiency regs and bean counters and based on the reviews so far, they seem to have done a decent job balancing everything.I def don’t disagree but I wouldn’t argue the 250 absolutely nailed it in the looks department. Or the angles/clearance/factory-ready 4x4 department.
Yea, it's really great if you live some place with refreeze.For me its the LC or GX. We like full-time 4WD or Auto 4WD so only the premium 4R would work, but the 6th gen 4R has a face only a mother could love.
Here in the PNW I see 30 year old 4Runners daily being used as commuter vehicles. I would say a 4Runner, Prado, or anything else with a Toyota badge will easily last 25 years in a salt free environment.This is what's kinda confusing to me. In history, the station wagon Cruisers had an engineering target for a 25 year service life for most if not all parts. When everything is on the same architecture, does that bring the 4Runner and the Prado up to that level or bring them down from the LC300/LX600?
I Stan Toyota as much as the next person here but this clearly wasn’t an impediment for Ford or Jeep when they brought/bring actual enthusiast-focused products to market.I think it's pretty damn good looking. The off road worthiness was always going to be somewhat limited to efficiency regs and bean counters and based on the reviews so far, they seem to have done a decent job balancing everything.
The release video said something to effect of "full time 4wd on premium grades" - I'm not sure what exactly that means, but I think it probably means Limited and Platinum trims only.Do we definitively know that the Premium 4Runner will be the only trim offered with full time 4wd? Just because this was the case with previous generation I'd be cautious about assuming it's true with the new one.
I guess I didn't explain what I meant clearly enough. I meant from Toyota's perspective of manufacturing and how they try to maximize platform efficiencies towards increasing profits, all while hitting emissions standards and providing good daily drivers.I Stan Toyota as much as the next person here but this clearly wasn’t an impediment for Ford or Jeep when they brought/bring actual enthusiast-focused products to market.
As much as it seems like it’s god awful even the wrangler got a PHEV, and a bronco variant prob isn’t far off, so not sure efficiency is a super viable point to consider in this context. Shooting from the hip on this but from a pure efficiency standpoint those PHEV models would seem to have lower overall emissions than the LC while still being leaps and bounds more capable off road. (Ride comfort, reliability, build quality aside.)
I'm willing to bet that after the First Editions are gone there will be some sort of off road focused variant. Whether they call it Trailhunter or something else. Toyota makes too much money off of slapping in a Fox suspension and new grill and charging 10k more.I do enough bad weather / winter road trips that I won't buy anything without AWD / full time 4WD. (Plus it's just great for long gravel roads.) But then I want it to be as good off-road as possible. And between the 4Runner Limited/Platinum and the Land Cruiser Land Cruiser (LC2?) the Land Cruiser is my preference, the 4Runner lacks a rear locker. I wish they had a Land Cruiser Trailhunter trim, I'd get that! Maybe by next year they'll have that, or maybe I'll get the LC and mod. Alternately, if the 4Runner Trailhunter had a full time 4WD option with center and rear lockers, I'd probably get that over the LC.
I'm willing to bet that after the First Editions are gone there will be some sort of off road focused variant. Whether they call it Trailhunter or something else. Toyota makes too much money off of slapping in a Fox suspension and new grill and charging 10k more.
Yes for the Platinum, optional for Limited. And it looks like neither of those will have a rear locker option.Do we definitively know that the Premium 4Runner will be the only trim offered with full time 4wd? Just because this was the case with previous generation I'd be cautious about assuming it's true with the new one.
That would be my assumption as well.My guess is that the optional part of the limited means that it also comes in a two-wheel drive model. Not that it comes with a part-time.
I agreeI'm willing to bet that after the First Editions are gone there will be some sort of off road focused variant. Whether they call it Trailhunter or something else. Toyota makes too much money off of slapping in a Fox suspension and new grill and charging 10k more.