Throwing this out there since I don't have an LC or a horse in this race.
From purely a spring rate perspective, it would seem that the 2721 would be easily enough. It's not an insignificant jump to go 60% in spring rate given the following data. (then again, the 2722 are spitting distance in rate and actually would be softer through resulting travel being linear).
Stock: 170
2721: 270/350
2722: 275
2723: 340
2724: 400
2725: 440
Part of what we associate with spring rate is ride height. That's not exactly the case as that really depends more on the free length of the spring. Perhaps the free length of the 2721 and resulting ride height isn't high enough and that's where the criticisms of the 2721 comes from? Ideally, spring rate and free length/lift are tuned for independently. But we're also stuck with the reality of available options on the market.
Just me, but if I had an LC, I would choose the softest suitable spring rate for the likely normal weight of the vehicle. This will give the best ride quality, while also performing best off-road with maximum articulation. If that spring doesn't result with enough lift, use spring spacers or trim packers to get the target ride height. Then to address fully laden trip weight, support with airbags, which gives adjustability to increase spring rate for load, ride height, and stability.
EDIT
Here's a great post with additional options beyond OME
From purely a spring rate perspective, it would seem that the 2721 would be easily enough. It's not an insignificant jump to go 60% in spring rate given the following data. (then again, the 2722 are spitting distance in rate and actually would be softer through resulting travel being linear).
Stock: 170
2721: 270/350
2722: 275
2723: 340
2724: 400
2725: 440
Part of what we associate with spring rate is ride height. That's not exactly the case as that really depends more on the free length of the spring. Perhaps the free length of the 2721 and resulting ride height isn't high enough and that's where the criticisms of the 2721 comes from? Ideally, spring rate and free length/lift are tuned for independently. But we're also stuck with the reality of available options on the market.
Just me, but if I had an LC, I would choose the softest suitable spring rate for the likely normal weight of the vehicle. This will give the best ride quality, while also performing best off-road with maximum articulation. If that spring doesn't result with enough lift, use spring spacers or trim packers to get the target ride height. Then to address fully laden trip weight, support with airbags, which gives adjustability to increase spring rate for load, ride height, and stability.
EDIT
Here's a great post with additional options beyond OME
Ok I've spent obscenely too much time on this. Bumper is painted and ready for installation this weekend. Pre-bumper I have the Tough Dog TDC931L springs and when I'm loaded with family and cooler I sit very level (no rake), or a bit of squat if I have the trailer hooked up... measurements below from top lip of my 17" Icon wheels to the fender (I used that instead of the center hub because it's hard to determine the precise center):
Setup LF RF LR RR Vehicle only, airbags at 5psi 12 12.5 13.5 14 Trailer hitched, no weight dist. 13 13 11.5 12.25 Trailer hitched, WD set 12.75 12.5 12.25 12.75 Trailer hitched, WD set, 30 psi 12.75 12.5 13 13.25
I've got about 1.5" of rake when empty right now. I'm running about 1" of squat when trailered but otherwise unladen with no family or camping gear (1/2"-3/4" too high in the front, 1/2"-3/4" too low in the rear). Laden with family and dog and it's another 300# in the rear. And I haven't yet added 200# of bumper plus all the leverage associated with crap hanging off the rear. Thus even without have actually installed it yet (hoping to do it this weekend) I'm pretty damn sure I will need to step up the rear springs. That said, without the trailer but with an extra 300# in the trunk (kid + dog) the ride is spot on plush and perfect right now.
I charted all the rear spring options I could find that would be relevant. Info below is what the vendors claim. My setup is in green. Options I'm currently considering are in orange. It's interesting to me how some of the numbers line up but others don't. For instance the heights, coil wraps, wire diameter, and #/in ratings between the King KTRR-131HHD and OME2723 are nearly identical, but the King spring is rated for 100kg more constant load. They also look similar to the Tough Dog TDC931VHL spring but that has a minimum constant load rating at the top of the King and OME max range - and that plus my current experience with the basic Tough Dog spring makes me think the constant load ratings somehow matter more than the free height, wire diameter, and compression specs. OME and IronMan spring options are half the cost of the Tough Dog and King options in the USA... otherwise I'd likely just step up to the next TD spring.
vendor part # l/h mm r/h mm coils wire mm low lb/in high lb/in min load kg max constant kg min load lb max const lb King Springs KTRR-131H 450 470 7.2 18 240 100 250 220 550King Springs KTRR-131HD 430 450 7.2 19 275 100 300 220 660King Springs KTRR-131HHD 430 450 7.2 20 340 300 500 660 1100King Springs KTPR-131HD 435 455 8.4 19 250 350 100 300 220 660OME OME-2721 0" lift 430 440 8.42 18.5 270 350 0 0OME OME-2722 1" lift 430 440 7.2 19 275 0 200 0 440OME OME-2723 1" lift 440 450 7.2 20 340 200 400 440 880OME OME-2724 1" lift 435 445 7.2 21 400 400 600 880 1320OME OME-2725 1" lift 435 445 7.71 22 440 600 1320Tough Dog TDC931L 1" lift 445 475 7.2 18 240 0 300 0 660Tough Dog TDC931HL 1" lift 425 455 7.2 19 275 300 500 660 1100Tough Dog TDC931VHL 1" lift 425 455 7.2 20 340 500 1100Bilstein B12 53-297686 180 396Eibach E30-82-072-04-02 414 414 300 90 180 198 396Icon Dual Rate 52750 ? ? 0 0Trail Tailor Tourflex Standard 505 515 9.77 100 300 220 660Trail Tailor Tourflex HD 545 555 19.5 180 320 300 660Ironman TOY064A 1" lift 425 440 19 269 0 200 0 440Ironman TOY064B 2" lift 455 470 19 269 0 300 0 660Ironman TOY064EA 2" lift 465 475 20 286 100 400 220 880Ironman TOY064C 2" lift 455 465 21 371 400 880
Last edited: