Correct, I did the injectors later on. I was watching the expenses at the time and knew if I were to have to do something later on it was only my time that I'd be out so I didn't do it then. At 90k I'd replace the fuel filter with a modified one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
semlin said:am I missing something or isn't there another rather well known shop specializing in 80s in the Denver area other than Robbie that might be able to work on Farley's truck???
turbocruiser said:I think alot of times when specific shops advise you to avoid doing this its because THEY want to avoid doing this due to inexperience or inexpertise. Keep in mind my example as well as the examples of many more here that our HG's WERE actively failing. You have two choices: either catch it ahead of time for less money OR catch it behind time for more money. QUOTE]
I disagree. I am very hesitant to do this kind of work when it's not broken. I would advise someone the same way. Even if they came to me and showed me an online forum poll that showed 10% were failing.
If they are not cruiserheads, what are you gonna expect from someone when you tell them you'd like to do more than a grand worth of work on a 150,000 mile motor, but don't want to re-ring or putting new bearings in.
I have to say, as much as I'm not convinced with doing this as a PM, I'm thinking about doing them for people. Might as well if you guys can scare enough people into doing them.
Gumby said:turbocruiser said:I think alot of times when specific shops advise you to avoid doing this its because THEY want to avoid doing this due to inexperience or inexpertise. Keep in mind my example as well as the examples of many more here that our HG's WERE actively failing. You have two choices: either catch it ahead of time for less money OR catch it behind time for more money. QUOTE]
I disagree. I am very hesitant to do this kind of work when it's not broken. I would advise someone the same way. Even if they came to me and showed me an online forum poll that showed 10% were failing.
If they are not cruiserheads, what are you gonna expect from someone when you tell them you'd like to do more than a grand worth of work on a 150,000 mile motor, but don't want to re-ring or putting new bearings in.
I have to say, as much as I'm not convinced with doing this as a PM, I'm thinking about doing them for people. Might as well if you guys can scare enough people into doing them.
Well, respectfully, your advice would have only made my problem worse; the HG was actively failing, the Head was warping, etc, all while no single symptom of failure was present. I'm glad we got it now and not later. Yer the pro though so I'm not sayin I know as much or half as much personally, but again respectfully, I'll take Robbie's advice in general and my experience in specific over your differening opinion in this case. Still G, differing or not, I'll fight to the death your right to say your opinion!![]()
![]()
God Bless America!
![]()
Rich said:Turbo, passenger side head to block interface can be visually examined with a light and an inspection mirror. Need to remove heat shields first. I expect that the leaking coolant would have been visible.
Rich said:Your pictures show evidence of coolant leaking on the passenger side block, do they not? I am pointing out that this could have been seen with a close inspection.

Rich said:Your pictures show evidence of coolant leaking on the passenger side block, do they not? I am pointing out that this could have been seen with a close inspection.

Tuner said:I've followed this thread with great interest and far less understanding. My 80 has 186k. Any way to tell from this photo if the PO already replaced the HG?

turbocruiser said:Gumby said:Well, respectfully, your advice would have only made my problem worse; the HG was actively failing, the Head was warping, etc, all while no single symptom of failure was present.
I've beenand
watching this thread and thinking of chicken little.
We have a pretty small sample of failed (or in this case, not failed yet) head-gaskets. In this specific case, it's on a NA vehicle that has been modified to forced induction. Two of the sample of failed gaskets are on vehicles owned by one person (not trying to be a d!ck here IdahoDoug, just talking purely statistics) which points to some other common denominator.
Of course they're all actively failing. So is everything else. The HG poll shows what some think is a surprising number of failures, but this is hardly a random sample. Too much pseudo-science for me.
Personally, I'm interested in the MAF turbo (if they ever get it ready for the public) and if I go that route, I'm going to r&r the HG...but I would do that anyway on a 150k vehicle going to forced induction. Hell, there are very few 150k motors I would even consider for forced-induction to begin with. I'm sure I'll see areas of the HG that don't look like new, but that doesn't mean it has failed!
I'm not saying anyone isn't entitled to their opinion and I know I'm not the most popular opinion in the room on this one so...
FLAME ON!
Cheers, guys,
tiorio said:We have a pretty small sample of failed (or in this case, not failed yet) head-gaskets. In this specific case, it's on a NA vehicle that has been modified to forced induction. Two of the sample of failed gaskets are on vehicles owned by one person (not trying to be a d!ck here IdahoDoug, just talking purely statistics) which points to some other common denominator.
Of course they're all actively failing. So is everything else. The HG poll shows what some think is a surprising number of failures, but this is hardly a random sample. Too much pseudo-science for me.
landtank said:That could have easily been written by IdahoDoug a year ago, just substitute "Landtank" for the above "IdahoDoug",
best of luck

turbocruiser said:Gumby said:Well, respectfully, your advice would have only made my problem worse; the HG was actively failing, the Head was warping, etc, all while no single symptom of failure was present. I'm glad we got it now and not later. Yer the pro though so I'm not sayin I know as much or half as much personally, but again respectfully, I'll take Robbie's advice in general and my experience in specific over your differening opinion in this case. Still G, differing or not, I'll fight to the death your right to say your opinion!![]()
![]()
God Bless America!
![]()
I think your gasket was failing and before too long you would have noticed coolant loss. At that point you would have needed to do something.
If you think your head was warping, why didn't you take it to a machine shop and at least have it checked?
I think an aluminum head on a cast block on an I-6 will eventually have head gasket issues. I think the 1FZ is a good enough engine that we could do just a head gasket on a 150,000 mile engine. I also think most mechanics will think it's nuts to do so, but we know better.![]()
Are the people who have had failures finding cracked heads or bent heads? (heads too warped to refinish)
I guess I'm in the position where if mine goes I can fix it at my leasure. I don't have the time or money to be chasing things that are only potential problems. With 4 cruisers I have enough active problems to keep me busy.
I guess I'm being a Devil's advocate here. Of course doing PM maintenance is better than not. What NEEDS to be done vs. what could be done is a huge difference. I mean, nobody has changed their timing chains with the heads off. I realize it's a huge job, but if your chain breaks while you are on vacation, you are seriously hosed. How many 22Rs were junked after the chain broke and took out the head? It would be better to put new bearings and rings in at 150,000 miles too.
As I said, if I get too many more requests from 80 owners to do thier HGs, I'm gonna just start doing them. I'll do mine first. It'll be interesting to see if there's a difference with green coolant. I don't know if I can do it without sending them to the machine shop for checking out and new valve seals. I don't think I'd be able to sleep.
It's funny because back in the 80s, we'd do lift and slip HG changes on 2.2Ls because otherwise the labor to R&R the head would have totalled the car.![]()
)