I've mixed feelings about the engineering of 200 series. It was designed with less maintenance in mind for sure. This seem to be industry wide trend to reduce cost of ownership (annual maintenance cost). In doing so parts are eventually replaced like front wheel bearings, rather than serviced periodically. The jury is still out on engine longevity, but indications are the 4.7L 2UZ will beat out the 5.7L 3UR on this score.
One of my first impression of the 100 series, was how easy the oil filter was to get at and replace. In the 200 series the engineers did not have the shop in mind at all, with respect to oil filter for one. This is also true of the transfer case gear lube drain. I've not dig deep into the 200 series yet, but feel the engineers drop the ball in respect to keeping the mechanic in mind.
But like all Land Cruiser before, they've kept with the theme of more refinements & capabilities. The 200 series, IMO, has many features that 100 series enthusiast and off road builds inspired and pioneered. I've long held Toyota keeps a watch eye forums like mud and IMHO the 200 shows it. Form little changes like rear lower hatch tool storage compartments, customizable DLRL (on or off) and more within setting of NAV screen which 100's must be modified to accommodate. Too bigger changes like KDSS suspension system. It has more towing capacity, stopping power, creature comforts and a stronger & lighter frame. Amazingly the 200 gets better HWY MPG even with added weight, but seems a little less MPG in DD use around the city. To be fair, I've the remote start option, which could be why I'm seeing lower MPG as a DD.
Yes Velam was rebadged BMW Isetta, at least that was the best we came up with. Good call!