So Here's the response from these crooked bastards... After reading their response... I'll copy mine below... and let me know if you think I'm going the right direction with this. It goes without saying... I'm mad as hell with these crooked a$$holes. You know they'd never admit to a defective product, but they're playing us for fools if they want us to believe the reasoning's behind the denial.
Here's my response:
Attention: Mike Huffstetler,
My name is Blake Halfacre and I am writing you in response to not covering my defective product claim/ Report: CN281413.
In your response letter (11/29/2018) you informed me that your filter “was found to have the correct conformation to its engineering design”, and that there was a “misapplication not covered by NAPA warranty” stating that you “list the NAPA 1515 series for this particular application”.
You had also stated in your letter that if I needed further assistance concerning this matter to contact you directly.
Well I do need further assistance in this matter… Here’s why…
I’d like to show you proof in your own website part searches (see attached screenshot photos) where you indeed also list the 1348 series filters for this vehicle/ engine type.
First… you need to understand that my specific model of 1996 Lexus LX450 is actually a Re-Badged version of the more prevalent 1996 Toyota Land cruiser. With the exception of a few changes in exterior badges, interior trim pieces, and the sound systems… they are otherwise mechanically identical in their drive train, and sharing identical power trains having the exact same Toyota 4.5 Liter (1FZ-FE) gasoline engines.
I’d like to call to your attention that I was sold this filter by a knowledgeable NAPA customer service tech who used your own database to find a correct filter fitment… not for my specific model vehicle… but instead… for the same manufacturer of the Toyota 4.5 Liter (1FZ-FE) engine.
I challenge anyone to find stamping or identifiers on my engine that indicates it’s anything other than a Toyota 1FZ-FE engine, or that the 1348 filter series is indeed a misapplication by even your own part matching standards.
If this 1348 series filter is considered by you/ NAPA to be the incorrect part… but I can then show objective proof (cross referenced) as the correct or suitable part by instead matching engine types through your own fitment database… My claim cannot be dismissed by reason you’ve listed due to the ambiguity.
The burden of proof is now back on you to show if there are any differences in the Lexus LX450 engine vs the Toyota Landcruiser of the same year… I’ll give you some help… there aren’t any differences.
Here are the facts in my case. After performing an oil and filter change and driving what I thought was a freshly serviced vehicle… I was 200+ miles into discovering simultaneous engine noise and that I had no indicated oil pressure. As a former believer in your products… and as a certified gas turbine engine mechanic I decided to first identify the source of the more common causes of oil pressure loss. First was oil inspection/ level check that was good, and next was the replacement of the filter with a Toyota OEM part after your regional representative’s instructions. The replacement of the filter remedied the indicated pressure loss problem, but unfortunately the audible sign was/ is still present. Not only do I know it was your (now proven) approved fitment filter… I have both audible and visible damage by excessive oil burning at startup that wasn’t present beforehand.
Either this was a defective filter of which the details aren’t being shared with me, or there is improper fitment guidance from your own database resources that can be misinterpreted by NAPA service techs. How your website has different approved parts for identical engines with the differences being potentially damaging is entirely NAPA’s liability.
I’m confident that a pragmatic view of the extrinsic evidence I’m presenting in this claim keeps me within the protections of the warranty, or some other form of legal recompense. I would like to have this matter solved without the use of outside legal counsel, but will do so if my vehicle isn’t brought back to its previous state of reliability.
With hopes of a prompt and fair outcome.
Respectfully
Blake Halfacre
View attachment 1586396
View attachment 1586399