I love the haters... :)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

BTW- I hate :mad: that Woody or Gumby is no longer counting posts in the FJ Cruiser forum for our post count. We all might as well stop posting in this forum now since the "padding" has stopped :doh:

:beer: :D
 
I can deal with the IFS, it will go anywhere I normally go. What I don't like is the tiny windows and the huge blind spot.

One of the few vehicles that doesn't have a major direct competitior is the Wrangler. The basic styling of the 40 and the CJ has endured beyond just about all other car styles. It has a proven appeal that won't go away anytime soon. I won't rule out buying an FJC until I see one and take one for a spin, but a Taco seems like a more appealing and useful choice.

If I were king, we would have a modernized 40 style Toyota. Simple, with form following function.
Hard or soft top option, e lockers optional. Between the appealing style and the reputation Toyota has earned here, it would be a hit. Every other car on the road here in CO is Wrangler eventhough lots of folks agree that it's not a near Toyota quality.
 
3FJ40 said:
Point is, they simply don't want to!

That hits the nail on the head right there, and what can we all do about it, send hatemail to ToyMoCo or deal with it. That seems to be the definite division of sides here too...which makes things a lot easier to argue about when there are only two sides :D

Do vehicle manufacturers actually have a "loss leader" product? I can't really make the same retail principles in our business apply to a vehicle manufacturer and dealership. When its winter, we put water trough heaters on sale and put horse blankets and dog sweaters next to them right out front = I can't see how a 70 series is a loss leader for a 100 series.

We have never bought a Ranger because it was cheap and stayed around long enough to buy a Powerstroke because it was placed conveniently next to the Ranger on aisle 5.

I just don't see anything more than they can but they won't and we get this thing because we a trendy US consumers.
 
It's not just crash safety. There's a lot of other crap that car manufacturers have to do to sell a car here. OBDII is a big one. I don't know if the two door 4x4 tariff is expired, but it would add thousands to the price if it hasn't. Add that to the fact that Toyota already has as many or more models of SUVs than anybody else that sell well in the US, many of them built here, and they have 0 reason to sell a handful of 70 series to the few of us that would buy one. the average Joe is not going to spend $40 grand on a jeep like vehicle when they can buy a Jeep for under $20,000.
 
I'm just wondering exactly which 70-series do people want? There's at least a half-dozen incarnations, right? What if they imported an LJ-73? Sure its got a solid axle, but aside from that.... it's just a mini-truck right? And isn't that what the FJ-Cruiser is probably going to be, more or less?

The FJ-Cruiser represents a catchy vehicle (for the general market, not this group), small niche, that draws attention to the brand. Seems to be sort of like the Plymought Prowler. Not the real thing, on the right track, draws attention to Chrysler. Seems a heck of a lot better idea than importing a bunch of over-priced 70 series that most folks don't need, and even less can afford.

Imagine average Joe at the dealer. He looks at the V8 Tundra quadcab, versus the inline-6, manual tranny, bare bones 70-series. And the Tundra costs less...

As far as the FJ-Cruiser, I think its kind of ugly, but some improvement could be made. I'm interested to see the production version...

Matt
 
fj40Matt said:
I'm just wondering exactly which 70-series do people want?

I want this one.

HZJ78.jpg
 
I WANT THIS ONE!

HD/HZ/BJ-74 PPLLEEAASSEE!

picture.JPG
 
yooper said:
I want this one.

HZJ78.jpg

I would trade in my Tacoma in a minute if I could have one of those.

BTW - when I was in Japan last September, the Toyota dealer told me that the 70 series is no longer being sold in Japan. So the US market is not the only market missing out on the 70 series.
 
yooper said:
I want this one.

HZJ78.jpg



Thanks for posting this pic. I now have a new wallpaper :)
 
Mace said:
HZJ60 Guy said:
VERY good points all. I mean come on guys. We all know how well the 70 series are made. If a TJ can pass a crash test you dont think a FJ/HZJ/BJ-74 can pass better???
QUOTE]


Okay,
Fair question..

How many people can attest to how well a 70 series is made???

:D

i can. tough as. a friend of mine flipped his end on end, went over twice (second revolution in the air) before landing on it's side. we pulled it back up onto it's wheels, tracked down a short in the dizzy (350 chev) and drove it. it was fine. still tracks straight and true, etc etc etc

mmm might pop over to the local dealer

http://lc78.toyota.com.au/LC78/HomePage/0,,,00.html
 
Heffenoche said:
Face it, Toyota must sell a vehicle that can be driven on a daily basis. No one can sell a vehicle that is purely a trail princess and make a profit. Why do most of the people wheeling built 40s trailer their rigs to the trail rather than drive them there? How many people that do own and DD a 40 don’t have another vehicle at their disposal? An uncomfortable riding vehicle seriously limits your market of potential buyers.

My point is that to sell a new vehicle in the US market is that it must handle the DD task fairly well because the buyer may not have a second vehicle to pick up the task of a long hauler.

you can't DD a 75? or 70? i daily drive my 76 fj40 without power steering... most my 4x4 friends daily drive their 75 series, and the new one is coil sprung front, comes with power windows, remote central locking, air con, and CD player... why can't you DD this?
 
bad_religion_au said:
Don't rub it in :flipoff2: . I would dearly love to smuggle a 78 diesel pickup into the US...but thats a different thread.

I could bitch about the FJ and completely understand the dislikes of the car. That said, the wife and I have already decided we will be in the market for one when they are finally released.

This car was simply designed for the US market...a US market that made the Lexus branded SUV's as popular as the already loaded out 80 and 100 series, and has made retro styled cars and trucks very profitable for the mfgr's. I would expect nothing less from Toyota because it is all about the money, bottom line. If there was enough of a market for the 78's in the US, Toyota would bring them here...money. There's not enough of a market for them here because they are too utilitarian, not enough bling for the Americans. The FJ brings the bling.

Hell, I wish Toyota had taken all the old tooling for the 40's, put a 3FE, H55, 4:1 case, 4.11's, lockers and updated the interior just to show chEEP how to build a "Trail Rated" 4x4. I'll settle for the FJ though. A little lift, more tire and another locker and I'll be good. Just my 2 er maybe 3 cents worth.
 
Chef said:
I'd buy a 78 series in a heartbeat. I'd DD it, and I'd tow my 40 with it. Slowly, I'm sure. But I'd be willing to sell my Cummins for that:)

I wouldn't buy one...a truck like that would make sense for my place but it's just too small. The cab is way too small for all my junk and it wouldn't pull a gooseneck trailer without popping a wheelie :D

Dodge and Ford rule the diesel pickup world, no denying that - another example of Toyota producing a awesome niche vehicle and not wanting to compete on US soil.
 
3fj40 said:
Europe has some very strict emissions that would pass US laws with flying colors, it's already been done on most of those engines.

The 1HZ is no longer welcome on the Europe market because of emissions, and the 1HD is taking the same path. no more 70 series around here either.
Anyway, the 1FZ-FE, which is currently and readily available in some 70 series models would fit in the US market with minor hassle...
 
Back to the subject : I really don't like the "FJ cruiser" because it really looks like crap. It could be a decent 4x4, I don't care it's so butt ugly I wouldn't touch it with a pole.
 
bad_religion_au said:
you can't DD a 75? or 70? i daily drive my 76 fj40 without power steering... most my 4x4 friends daily drive their 75 series, and the new one is coil sprung front, comes with power windows, remote central locking, air con, and CD player... why can't you DD this?

I don't remember saying anything about the 70 or 74 series nor did I say you can't DD a 40 because I've done it too. I was simply stating that that the US market would not support the vehicle that most of us want and still pass all US regulations and sell at a profit.

A lot of the rest of the world still has access to Land Cruisers we would like to have in the US.
 
haystax said:
I think it is foolish to think Toyota would do anthing other than what they have done. They already build the Cruiser(s) everyone on here wants, have for years - they don't, won't, and can't import them to the USA and make money. Simple market demand - how many people do each of us know that would condiser a clunky, boxy 70 Series rather than a Cherokee or Exploder - market demographics, that's all.

I'm pretty dissapointed that it didn't try to match some of the Rubicons specs, e-lockers and 4:1 would have made me put up my deposit right now - but I'm certainly gonna take a test drive when they come out and vendors in the aftermarket are going to have a ton of products on the shelf or in the works to make this as capable as any other new USA Toyota model.

I agree.

It seems like an old Toyota designer went to the dark side and is workin for J@#p now.

How many of us would jump on this if it had a Toyota emblem-

http://jpmagazine.com/featuredvehicles/154_0501_glad/

They just seem to be going in a different direction. Obviously, not the direction most of us on here like.

I still have owned several Toyota makes and models over the years. Prolly own many more in the future, and will continue until they give me reason not to.
 
VTFJ40 said:
I agree.

It seems like an old Toyota designer went to the dark side and is workin for J@#p now.

How many of us would jump on this if it had a Toyota emblem-

http://jpmagazine.com/featuredvehicles/154_0501_glad/

They just seem to be going in a different direction. Obviously, not the direction most of us on here like.

I still have owned several Toyota makes and models over the years. Prolly own many more in the future, and will continue until they give me reason not to.

I agree completely. Toyota seems to have lost there way. At least they are deaf dumb and blind to a huge market of interest here in the US.

TB
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom