Any mechanics out there with a technical opinion???
For years I have always looked at most torque specs to read a “range”. In the FSM and other similar publications, there is almost always a “range” indicated. Such a 75~95 ft/lb as being able to select from 75 ft/lb as being the minimum torque for the fastener to work properly, up to 95 ft/lb being the maximum for the fastener before it could be compromised and perhaps fail. And of course there are many specs with only a single torque given.
Now a friend has said that in the military training, they are told that the lower number is a “first torque” for all the fasteners on that particular part, and then increase all of the fasteners to the upper torque for the final set. So saying this is not a “range”, it is a pre-torque and then the final torque.
I have not been able to locate any definite information on which is correct. I just personally believe that the books/manuals give the numbers as a “range”, and as long as each is torqued evenly on any given part, all is well and happy.
Have I been wrong, or could the military be different???
Thanks,
Jerry D.
For years I have always looked at most torque specs to read a “range”. In the FSM and other similar publications, there is almost always a “range” indicated. Such a 75~95 ft/lb as being able to select from 75 ft/lb as being the minimum torque for the fastener to work properly, up to 95 ft/lb being the maximum for the fastener before it could be compromised and perhaps fail. And of course there are many specs with only a single torque given.
Now a friend has said that in the military training, they are told that the lower number is a “first torque” for all the fasteners on that particular part, and then increase all of the fasteners to the upper torque for the final set. So saying this is not a “range”, it is a pre-torque and then the final torque.
I have not been able to locate any definite information on which is correct. I just personally believe that the books/manuals give the numbers as a “range”, and as long as each is torqued evenly on any given part, all is well and happy.
Have I been wrong, or could the military be different???
Thanks,
Jerry D.


