Expedition Overland Livestream including new 200 (Ended)
- Thread starter tabraha
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 200 series expedition overland
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
- Thread starter
- #2
So far I see: (Wait why am I doing this? @Equipt could probably do this much easier!!!
- 2016 white TLC
- Christo's dual batt tray on the list
- CBI aluminum front bumper I think?
- Dual swingout, dual spare rear
- Warn Xeon up front (tight fit with the controller from what I see though)
- Grabber X3's
- CBI aluminum sliders, 52lbs total
- Blacked out grill
- Hood blackout on the double hump
- Eezi-Awn Roof Rack (not on)
Last edited:
Nice that he addresses the trade-offs.
What I can't figure out regarding complaints about remembering to charge his winch remote...is...
-Why don't people just leave them plugged in to a USB charger in the vehicle, so that it's topped off every time the vehicle is used? I do this with with numerous devices in my 200, including NiMh and lithium battery chargers, cycling computer/GPS, search light, and more. It means that every single time I reach for a rechargeable device or battery, it has maximum charge. I leave some plugged in to constant-on USB outlets if they use minimal draw, or I plug them into the 115 outlet in back and they just charge when the vehicle is on. Works a charm.
What I can't figure out regarding complaints about remembering to charge his winch remote...is...
-Why don't people just leave them plugged in to a USB charger in the vehicle, so that it's topped off every time the vehicle is used? I do this with with numerous devices in my 200, including NiMh and lithium battery chargers, cycling computer/GPS, search light, and more. It means that every single time I reach for a rechargeable device or battery, it has maximum charge. I leave some plugged in to constant-on USB outlets if they use minimal draw, or I plug them into the 115 outlet in back and they just charge when the vehicle is on. Works a charm.
What was the explanation? I'm almost out of data on my phone so I can't view it yet. Stupid t-mobile.
CBI apparently
- Thread starter
- #7
They were saying their primary goal for the bumper was really to enhance clearance (approach) more so than collision. That being said it's still better than our tupperware. For the sliders Clay mentioned that they used them more for door/side protection than getting over rocky obstacles. He even made mention of how they did their last big trip with just the stock running boards. 26lbs/slider... wow.
Fair enough. Building for a particular purpose sounds good to me. If they're going to avoid the rocky stuff they'll be fine.
While I would never want aluminum sliders, I can see why they're interested in mitigating added weight as much as possible considering they will likely be seeing a lot of mud where they're going. The heavier your truck is the harder it is to get unstuck from mud, snow and other sinking slippery stuff. It looks like they're building for a very specific purpose which is great when you have sponsorships 
CBI said these are available now, 4 to 6 week lead time.
With the way they've loaded up for previous expeditions, they really need to save all of their carrying capacity for gear. I would imagine they are easily of GVWR, though they are modified (suspension) to likely increase factory GVWR too.
Being overly heavy means having a harder time traversing various obstacles, not to mention on road handling.
It's also an issue of overall rig durability. More weight puts more stress on the various suspension/tire/engine/etc. components. Making them more likely to fail, especially for a long haul overlanding trip.
Sometimes less is more.
Being overly heavy means having a harder time traversing various obstacles, not to mention on road handling.
It's also an issue of overall rig durability. More weight puts more stress on the various suspension/tire/engine/etc. components. Making them more likely to fail, especially for a long haul overlanding trip.
Sometimes less is more.
Thanks for the update. I sent them an email and will call.
Taco2Cruiser
Crazy American Off Road
What I find interesting is that they say the front bumper on the 200 was primarily for clearance.
They proved in their Central American season and the Return to Mackenzie, that the two 4runners with stock plastic bumper covers was all they needed when a hidden winch mount was used.
5th generation 4runners have an approach angle of 33 degrees. 2016 Land Cruiser has an approach angle of 32 degrees.
I feel that the reason was really that CBI wanted to show what they can do, which is great. And I'm really happy for the whole XOverland crew and the whole Toyota community. Plus more people making products, but I think the theory behind why something was done, was not really in function reasons. Especially because the wing strength of a narrow 1/4" aluminum bumper is not going to protect from a tree bump.
They proved in their Central American season and the Return to Mackenzie, that the two 4runners with stock plastic bumper covers was all they needed when a hidden winch mount was used.
5th generation 4runners have an approach angle of 33 degrees. 2016 Land Cruiser has an approach angle of 32 degrees.
I feel that the reason was really that CBI wanted to show what they can do, which is great. And I'm really happy for the whole XOverland crew and the whole Toyota community. Plus more people making products, but I think the theory behind why something was done, was not really in function reasons. Especially because the wing strength of a narrow 1/4" aluminum bumper is not going to protect from a tree bump.
R; CBI front pumber is gorgeous on the Lc200 and the blacked out grill makes it look mean. Anyone know how much the CBI bumper costs?
I would LOVE to have that CBI bumper. Maybe we can talk them into a group buy?
I've been watching Clay and his team from the very first videos they have made. They have come a long way in their cinematic skills, truck builds, and sponsorships.
Regarding the use of aluminum and their weight consciousness...I wonder if shipping weight is also factoring into their decision. Clay didn't mention it but I've shipped vehicles by barge to and from Alaska and they placed weight restrictions on us. Just a thought. Like y'all have said though, I agree their primary reason is to use that weight for gear and equipment etc.
I sure hope these rigs arrive safe and sound down there. He also mentioned they were going to do this expedition in two segments and leave the trucks in storage in South America for a couple of months until spring arrives in Patagonia. I hope it's secure for the sake of that 200's well being. I'm sure it'll be fine but I would be worried.
I sure hope these rigs arrive safe and sound down there. He also mentioned they were going to do this expedition in two segments and leave the trucks in storage in South America for a couple of months until spring arrives in Patagonia. I hope it's secure for the sake of that 200's well being. I'm sure it'll be fine but I would be worried.