That is a pretty good story except I don't believe it because my experience is the opposite. No change in fuel mileage, no more power and it runs worse and pops in the exhause manifold during deceleration.
Every time anyone spends more than an hour or $100 on their cruiser, they think it runs better but the dynamometer doesn't lie.
I did experience a 20% gain in fuel economy.
Seriously...I swear it
However........you probably deserve a ton a credit for that because I rebuilt my carb using your videos for reference. Thank you very much for making those.
In my case the dilemma was between replacing smog pump, air injection manifold, cat , and some EGR stuff in addition to head gasket, mani gasket, and machining the manifolds.
It backfired before the work (mani leak) but not after (functional decel fuel cut)
I tend to agree that it probably doesnt do much if you have a functional stock emissions system. When you dont, and considering all you CA cruiser owners drive up the price of replacement parts, it is a pretty quick add.
I couldn't meet emissions standards here in NJ until after I did that work. Afterwards, no problems. also no noticeable increase in power
I have always considered the claims about increased HP dubious at best. Part of those claims may be the result of other problems solved along with a "proper" desmog.
I like it because it is simpler and it frees up space in the engine compartment. Now I can flush the cooling system without pulling ten pounds of spaghetti out of the way.
Correct me if I am wrong but the central design of the power plant didnt change much from '75-'87. Just ad hoc bolt on tweaks that siphoned and re-burned exhaust gasses in various ways to meet the admirable intentions of the California Legislature. It was the 5th largest economy on the planet and Toyota couldn't afford to lose that market. Much like I couldn't afford to spend a grand on parts on top of all the necessities.