75pinz said:This eternal Jeep hatred is so ridiculous. All s*** breaks. This site used to be a nice place to be with people who were accepting of all things 4x4. I understand the Toyota forum thing but come one. I spent about and hour outside today looking at Hodag's 60. The problem was a 6 month old OEM Toyota dist. cap. Too bad he didn't get the cheapest one he could find at auto zone or something. I didn't think that could be it as the cap was so new. My
buddy's cherokee is out in the driveway for me to put u joints in it. 295k miles on the originals. No significant repairs at all. Hoses, belts, brakes.
I would like to see someone compare the Toyotas to something else. How about a FJ40 to a Pinz or a Volvo C303?
OK Pinz, Texx was pretty harsh on you but still; a guy gives a factual account that something advertised as "TRAIL RATED" is no longer warranteed becasue it is "TRAIL USED". Now he is "bashing"?
You really want to go down the road of how assanine that is? If you want to wear the badge then you need to back it up when it gets used that way. Yeah I can understand not covering a diff when some numb nuts tries to do burnouts with his Rubi fully locked. But an ECM? Come on, that's crap and we all know it.
I take my Taco down to the dealership for service and it's solid orange underneath. They don't give me any crap about abuse. It's pretty obvious that it lives offroad M-F and on weekends for fun but it's a truck and that's why they come with 4wd. If Jeep is gonna hang a guy out to dry like that then maybe they should change it from "trail rated" to "trail rated, just take our word for it".
Next up: Why bother comparing a 40 to a Pinz or C303? They are not even remotely comparable vehicles. It's like comparing a radio to a flashlight. Yeah they both run off of batteries but they aren't even remotely close to serving the same purpose.