A343F - All they all created equal?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
Jun 25, 2003
Threads
720
Messages
4,293
Location
Rixeyville, VA
I'm currently in the planning stages of a tranny build up for my 1997 LX450.

Can anyone confirm the capatibility of the A343F's?

I didn't think there were any differences, but just want to make sure I dont have an issue with putting, for example, a '95 LC80 transmission into my '97 Lexus.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Isn't the A343F behind the 2UZ?
 
Are Toyota reman'd A343's still available? Smart shopper price?
 
Thanks guys.

My main concern was the variance between 95-97. I have a performance valve body in my transmission currently, but lookinng to build up a 96 tranny and swap it in my truck, to reduce downtime.

A reman'd stock unit doesn't really interest me, as there is a shop here that can fully rebuild a high mileage one and make it handle more power.
 
A442F and I just happen to have one for sale. :grinpimp:

Search and you'll find lots of threads discussing this. To summarize both are adequate for the FZ's, with the A343F being much smaller.
 
Impreza said:
Buy used one from part out. There's a surplus of these. You shouldnt have to pay more than $500 plus shipping.

I know where to get one, that wasn't the question. I was just hoping to confirm the capability of a 96 LC transmission into a 97 LX. I'll be building the 96 while driving the current truck and then swapping transmission to reduce downtime
 
Are you having IPT (no affiliation) rebuild it or are you getting the rebuild kit and doing it yourself? I just started the tear down on my spare a343f tonight but haven't decided on where to go to get parts.

Patrick
 
Maybe a dumb question. Which is better, the A442F or the A343F?

Nobody seems to actually know rated maximum torque figures for either of them, and even then its still 'rated.' They both are capable of handling the ~375 ft-lb of torque from a supercharged 1fz.

The A442 looks cooler and has solenoid failure issues.

So the 442 wins.
 
there were several changes in the valve body through the years as well as to the clutch packs. This was going on right up to the end of production in 97.

So a near end production 97 would be the most current design. I posted up here years ago with the serial break downs of the changes.

If you plan on reworking the valve body than just get one from a 97 as the only changes that year were in the valve body.
 
I have the wholesale automatics set up Beno had mentioned. Behind a sc'd 1fz, it's "the cats meow"!
I'm not sure if Beno can help with Rodney's set up (torque converter and valve body) but I know a company who can... West coast cruisers.... No affiliation other than a happy customer.
 
Back
Top Bottom