100 Series cable tire hoists are known to rust up and seize, some of you may have likely encountered that. Part of that is the age but the 200's use an "open" design with a chain link hoist that lets debris and perhaps most importantly salt be washed out whereas the 100 has a cable hoist that has a plastic cover that let's them get packed full of junk. I've got a pile of 200 cross-members and hoists here left over from aux tank and rear bumper installs and they all function smoothly. Yet it seems every other 100 one we pull off is seized or a PITA to operate. Is it a design "upgrade" or simply age based? The frame side mounting, width and even the frame mounting brackets look identical when you compare the two. I think the entire 200 crossmember could easily be bolted into place BUT the alignment of the actual spare tire hoist is offset approx 7" so you'd have to re-work that. Another option is to unbolt the 200 hoist from the cross-member and bolt it to the 100 cross-member. The 100 uses 4 bolts where as the 200 uses 2 so there would be some quick drilling. Also you'd need to space the 200 hoist mechanism lower on the crossmember so the tool input clears.
100 Series cable w/cover
200 Series chain w/open design
Side by side of the two, pic is a little deceiving, they are the same bolt hole to bolt hole mounting width.
Frame side mounts, same dimensions, slightly different shape.
100 Series cable w/cover
200 Series chain w/open design
Side by side of the two, pic is a little deceiving, they are the same bolt hole to bolt hole mounting width.
Frame side mounts, same dimensions, slightly different shape.