I think there's a good argument for a higher amp alternator - and for dual batteries (more storage). In the PNW, we have a lot of cold/wet/dark days (not this winter, but usually). This means you're running lights, fan, wipers, rear defrost, and the radio. Put three or four wet people into the truck at the end of a day playing in the mountains, and you'll have the heater fan on high for quite awhile to keep the windshield clear. The stock alt does not put out enough amps to run all of this at idle...so if you are in the city, wipers will run slowly, lights will be dim, etc. A good battery can easily power all of this, but it puts out 12.5 volts, where an alternator (at speed) puts out 14 +/-. Bigger battery cables help, improving ground helps, but not enough in my experience. The 62's I've driven don't have this problem (they have an 80 amp alternator). None of the above includes extra's like higher wattage bulbs, additional lights, an amp, CB, etc...all of which just compound the problem at idle. If you are not at idle much, or don't need to run too many electrical loads when you are at idle, then the stock alt is fine.
There's a thread on here about using a 62 alternator on a 60. You need a longer bracket and to modify the plug (62's use a three wire plug). Coleman has the modified plug. Any welding shop can lengthen the 60 bracket so it'll fit the 62 alt. The stock belt will work. Not saying the GM alts are bad, but the 62 alt is a nice option for if you want to stay mr T.