Events/Trails 2008 USA Land Cruiser Pics and Test Drive Impressions (1 Viewer)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

pagemaster, with all due respect- get your head out of your a$$ ;)

06-335dcoupe-f-s.jpg


CAR review BMW 335D

"better than the petrol version"
The £35,475 335d is BMW's first twin-turbo straight six. It has a small turbo that spins up quickly at low engine speeds and a larger one that works at higher revs. Between them, they produce an uninterrupted torrent of torque, with no lag and no troughs.

It produces serious grunt from well under 2,000rpm - in fact, the peak torque of 479lb-ft comes at just 1,750rpm - and peaks at 286bhp. It does the 0-62mph charge in 6.1sec, is limited to 155mph, drinks diesel at a rate of 37.7mpg and emits 200g/km of carbon dioxide and BMW claims its running costs are class-leadingly low.

It comes as standard with a six-speed automatic transmission, which has upgraded hydraulics and electronics for quicker reaction times and quicker gearshift times. You can shift manually using the knobbly blobs on the steering wheel (they're not 'paddles' by anyone's definition) or you can let it make the changes itself, in D or the even swifter DS mode.

The best new-generation 3-Series coupe so far
In a single generation, the old BMW buyer's mantra of 'petrol and manual, petrol and manual, petrol and manual' has been turned on its head. This is the best new-generation 3-Series Coupe so far - and it's a diesel with an auto box. The petrols are very good, better in many ways than any earlier ones. But the diesels have leapfrogged them and the 335d has leapfrogged all the other diesels.

vid clips, engine sound, stats, etc
http://bmw335d.com/

what car has been kicking a$$ in LeMans? Oh yeah that V12 TDI 650hp/1100Nm torque
audi-r10.jpg
 
Nice find however read the technical specs close. The petrol 335 peaks its torque at 1300rpm while the diesel is actually higher around 1750. And for the record, the diesel needs to rev to 4400rpm to achieve its peak hp rating. That is pretty high.
That's because it's a turbocharged petrol. Non turbo petrols don't get much past 100Nm/litre.
Hence the high urban fuel consumption of 13 litres per 100km.

What is even better is comparing a 330 petrol to 330 diesel. The 330 petrol achieves its peak hp at 6700rpm while the diesel is a 4000rpm ...Yet the diesel is 1.1 l/100km more fuel effient than the petrol...the diesel doesnt look as effecient now does it?

That 1.1km/l is 18%. Do you not care about sucking the earth dry 18% faster than you should be?
No the diesel doesn't look as efficient. It looks more efficient and the torque figures make it look a lot more fun to drive.;)

FirstToy said it well.
 
Kinda of like watching rocky 4 and wondering what the big deal was about apollo dying. No reference point. :lol:

That's funny!:D
 
Apollo Creed died in Rocky IV? Great. I guess I can scratch that from my rental list.

No No No... the APOLLO 13 Shuttle had it's battery die in space. Everything worked out as the CREED of NASA is never to give up.

Sorry for the confusion :D
 
I'm not getting into this s*** with you again. There isn't one fact or anything else that I, or anyone else can say to you to get through your thick skull that will change your mind, or even to get you to be open minded about anything non Toy/Lex. That's fine, and you are entitled to your opinions. But, in doing so you are making yourself look like a complete, closed minded imbecile .

:cheers:

So, I suppose the RR's amazingly poor reliability record is a fairy tale because you've owned a couple gave you some problems, but nothing major?

I'm anxiously awaiting your explanation of their book value-- the lack thereof. You can buy a late 90's RR for next to nothing. Try to find a late 90's LC that's being given away...they aren't out there.
 
So, I suppose the RR's amazingly poor reliability record is a fairy tale because you've owned a couple gave you some problems, but nothing major?

I'm anxiously awaiting your explanation of their book value-- the lack thereof. You can buy a late 90's RR for next to nothing. Try to find a late 90's LC that's being given away...they aren't out there.


First of all, learn how to write a complete sentence...That first sentence wouldn't pass the 4th grade !! :hillbilly:

You are pretty fast off the plate there Sparky !! When did I make THAT post.... 10 weeks ago ?? Oh wait, you are a newbie, post #6 in fact ......Welcome:flipoff2::flipoff2:

Don't come in here on post # 6 being a cu:censor:t...I really couldn't care less what you or anyone else has to say about LR's...Sure, they have had their fair share of problems, but I have owned 3 and have been very pleased...So, unless you have personally owned one or more, your opinion is zero.

I noticed you bought your 1991 80 for $6K...I was recently offered $14.5K for my 1991 RR...Now, who is giving WHAT away ?? :lol:


Now, shut up and go to the end of the line !! :eek:
__________________
 
Last edited:
First of all, learn how to write a complete sentence...That first sentence wouldn't pass the 4th grade !!

...and your first sentence is the model of correct grammar? :ban:
 
FirstToy;[COLOR=white said:
2867624]...[/color]and your first sentence is the model of correct grammar? :ban:

As a matter of fact, it is. By the way, you should begin a sentence with a capital letter. :ban::ban:
 
i'm not the one playing capt. grammar police. The point is, your posts are not perfect and you are being an ass.
 
Hey, I'm not the one who pulled a random 8 week old post just to stir the pot. If some fu:censor:ng newbie cu:censor:t wants to start something, I'm more than willing to dance. That post of bm's had absolutely nothing to do with anything being discussed recently in this thread. Get it !! :mad:
 
Last edited:
Hey, I'm not the one who pulled a random 8 week old post just to stir the pot. If some fu:censor:ng newbie cu:censor:t wants to start something, I'm more than willing to dance. That post of bm's had absolutely nothing to do with anything being discussed recently in this thread. Get it !! :mad:
+ 1
 
I noticed you bought your 1991 80 for $6K...

kbb lists the value of a 91 RR around $3500
edmunds lists it for around $845-$2500

LR/RR do have poor reliability records.

So the guy didn't say anything inaccurate or personal against you. So yeah, kinda being an ass.
 
kbb lists the value of a 91 RR around $3500
edmunds lists it for around $845-$2500

LR/RR do have poor reliability records.

So the guy didn't say anything inaccurate or personal against you. So yeah, kinda being an ass.

OK, you're right. :rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
How many barrels of crude oil takes to make gallon of diesel fuel ?
Same question for gasoline.
Maybe I am using the incorrect mathematical table.
Any help will be helpful. Thank you.
 
kbb lists the value of a 91 RR around $3500
edmunds lists it for around $845-$2500

LR/RR do have poor reliability records.

So the guy didn't say anything inaccurate or personal against you. So yeah, kinda being an ass.

Those figures are irrelevant to a RR in the condition mine is in, by the way. And yes, I have been offered $14,500 for mine. Sorry to burst your bubble. Also, a vehicle is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it..:flipoff2:

Why don't you and BM get back to what this thread is about. Not spewing vile dribble about how awful LR's are . I'm not even close to being the ass I can be !! :flipoff2::flipoff2:
 
Last edited:
Those figures are irrelevant to a RR in the condition mine is in, by the way. And yes, I have been offered $14,500 for mine. Sorry to burst your bubble. Also, a vehicle is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it..:flipoff2:

Why don't you and BM (bowl movement??) get back to what this thread is about. Not spewing vile dribble about how awful LR's are . I'm not even close to being the ass I can be !! :flipoff2::flipoff2:


I think James is making the point that, in general (and this is borne out by too many sources to list), Rover products have been unreliable in operation. You may have a single example that has been fine, but so is the odd Dodge, and I still wouldn't characterize them as a quality brand. The key is the phrase "in general" and not a single example. I think the other guy was trying to make the same point, so there was no need to get defensive. If someone tells me that modern Mercedes are unreliable heaps, regardless of my brand loyalty, I'm not going to disagree with them because the proof is too overwhelming to deny. :cheers:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom