ABC's of 80's A/C and Cooling - Part 1

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
Jun 1, 2005
Threads
42
Messages
1,836
Location
Chicago
Part I - The Need for Aux Cooling

Now that Chicago is hitting 100, figured it might be a good time to put some data and thought into our 80’s issues of (over)heat. Since we don’t have a lot of data in regards to things like our Toyota Engine driven Thermo/Fan CFM, RPM and other factors that will help us determine the best cooling method for our trucks, maybe we can look at some of the things we do know about 134a and our A/C systems. For the purpose of discussions of 80 over/heat, I will only address the high pressure side of the A/C system, as it is what creates the heat in the condenser>radiator.

Problem: Many FJ80 owners replace new fan and fan thermostat, still have A/C cutout and overheat. It would appear this is caused by insufficient flow through the condensor and radiator causing heat soak of the condensor in extreme heat environments. Let's look at A/C performance to apply some numbers to the condenser, which in turn might offer some insight into possible solutions.

Toyota FSM lists R134a high pressure readings of 206-213psi as normal (optimal) functioning A/C. 134a has known temps for given pressures. Looking up 206psi pump outlet pressure, we have R134a at 133F. At 213psi we have R134a at 135F. So Toyota dictates the optimal temperature of our hi pressure side for maximum cooling is between 133-135F. Sounds fine, now let’s look at some extremes (high heat, high engine loads, low vehicle speed, low engine speeds) in terms of our 80 specifically.

Toyota pressure switch 866450-01080 (just about every 93>2002 R134a equipped 80/100), uses only the low and high pressure sides for R134a applications (mid range is open on switch - probably used in old R12 system application). Again, assuming properly functioning A/C low side pressures, we are only looking at the high side = high pressure cutout (caused by heat soak of condensor).

FSM (and switch) lists this pressure cutout at 412psi = off, 327psi = on. Back to the charts, that’s 167F = on and 186F = off respectively. Doesn’t seem bad… Except we have a problem that the condenser is most likely not exchanging any heat, since it’s now gained some 50F from it’s ‘normal’ operating function. Since the only heat around that condenser higher is the radiator, we are seeing heat soak from the radiator. Folks, plain and simple, that’s an airflow problem, specifically a lack of one causing heat soak of the condenser core.

I’ve involved myself in some pretty interesting discussions on electric vs engine fans on this forum as of late. It would appear obvious from the numbers above that an 80 that cuts out it’s A/C system is also maxed out on overall engine cooling capacity, because the condenser is heat soaking from the radiator. What to do? There are three ways I see to address this: electric fans replacing engine driven, ducting from engine bay, and/or pusher fan for existing system.

In my own experience and preference to run to redline with my supercharged truck, I prefer to just redo the whole kit and kabootle for several reasons (more to follow as I take on that project). Engine driven fans have a lot of limitations to them, and really have a difficult time handling low engine/vehicle speeds vs high condenser heat (pressure). I won’t go into the lists of our electric options, Summit Racing carries a wide variety that fit our trucks, and Flex-a-lite has a nifty controller that gives adjustability and progressive voltage (speed>cfm). Many junk yards (find the turbo cars!) have some phenomenal cooling with low amp draw that can be had cheap. For the purpose of this post however, let’s look at the advantage of the simplest solution to 80 cooling w A/C, adding an aux ‘pusher’ fan in front of the condenser.

Back to the numbers. From Toyotas published diagnostics we appear to want our A/C condenser temps to be 50-60F below our radiator temps for maximum cooling (195f-60f = 135f). The best way to achieve that (given the engine driven fan) is to put a pusher electric fan in front of the condenser to cool the condenser, because we don’t really directly care about the radiator or engine temps - yet. The radiator heat exchange should be addressed by the Radiator Fan and thermostat, whatever we do to the condenser shouldn’t matter - in fact it should only help. Next up in Part II – wiring options for the aux fan for maximum A/C effectiveness.

Scott Justusson
QSHIPQ Performance Tuning
Chicago IL
94 FZJ80 Supercharger
 
Last edited:
Well said Scott...l. As one of the first to install an aux fan in my 95' ( an LX 470 10" fan) The pusher fan did in fact help and kicks on when the A/C goes on. Several factors have helped: e.g, I have very dark (illegal tint) and a hood scoop to allow better cooling. The issue many of us have here in the southern states, is cooling passengers in back. This has become an issue with many people. I know my mods for better cooling have lowered my temps 3-4 degrees inside and taking out one of the middle seats assists in getting the A/C to the back kiddos.
Looking forward as to what options are out there.....maybe a larger fan?
Airlaird
 
Maybe I was one of the lucky ones, I had a 1993 80 series, and NEVER had a problem with cooling or running my A/C. Infact, I could be pulling a grade, throttle pegged, A/C on and it never broke past half way. I did have to put a new radiator in last year because the old one was leaking. I also converted the A/C to r-134a. Anyway, just my .02 cents
 
Fman said:
Maybe I was one of the lucky ones, I had a 1993 80 series, and NEVER had a problem with cooling or running my A/C. Infact, I could be pulling a grade, throttle pegged, A/C on and it never broke past half way. I did have to put a new radiator in last year because the old one was leaking. I also converted the A/C to r-134a. Anyway, just my .02 cents

You may have been running much hotter then you think, it seems the temp guage was "dumbed down" at some point ..... although it may have been after 93'
 
Part I (1/2) - Fan Install

Update:
Took the grill off to see which of the fans I had in the shop would fit in front of the condenser. This pusher type I had looked to be an easy fit, and within 10 minutes I had what's in the pic mounted up. I believe a 12in would fit by moving those horns (yes Ridk - Audi horns:), but the 10 I had looked too easy

The Fan:
10in pusher type, taken from a junked 900turbo a few years ago. Single speed, 8 blades, low clearance, low amp, 2 wire hookup.

The Install:
If you look at the PS mount, there is a 6mm threaded tab already there for a fan. I drilled 1 hole at the lower crossframe, sealed up the fan to condensor edge with some cam cover moulding (audi) I had laying around, left the bottom open just a half inch or so to allow water to get out easily. Note: The metal fan shroud is sealed to the condenser for maximum flow through the condenser.

Total Fan install time 20minutes.
Next up in Part II - the wiring and results.

Scott Justusson
QSHIPQ Performance Tuning
Chicago IL
AUXFAN1.webp
 
ABC's of 80's A/C and Cooling - Part I (3/4)

Update on the aux fan, it's now wired and the increased cooling inside the cabin at idle is noticeable. I have the fan relayed to come on at normal operating pressure (read: not tapped into the compressor-on circuit). Interesting (good) after-run operation I completely expected...

I will try to get some pressure (temp) readings within the next week to move this to Part II, but getting in line for the A/C diag/charge box to play around is not so easy right now. Without question, this mod makes a significant difference.

My thinking is to do a writeup for Dave on the toyota mag for this mod, and quite possibly offer a pre-wired, low banana bolt-in turnkey kit if there is enough interest. Warning to Rick, might include an audi pusher fan....

Cool in Chicago

Scott Justusson
QSHIPQ Performance Tuning
 
I like it, but would rather see a larger fan, preferably toyota in make. What temp does the fan switch on?

I assume you have access to obdII realtime dataloggers/recorders. It would be interesting to see the amount of "cooling" that the fan contributing. Maybe - unplug the fan and Idle for x minutes while watching the main mechanical fan engages multiple times, then cool the engine off for the day. Rerun the experiment with the fan pluged in. I could live with the experiment's error if the testing days were within a few degrees and % humidity. Towing could also generate more intresting test.
 
Keep up the good work on this, a lot of us suffer from weird AC stuff! For example, with over 100 d. F. in Denver the last few days, I have noticed that my idle speed in N is around 1100 rpms, setteling to around 900-1000 with AC on. Not normal, But maybe it is?

...
 
Cattledog said:
I like it, but would rather see a larger fan, preferably toyota in make. What temp does the fan switch on?

I assume you have access to obdII realtime dataloggers/recorders. It would be interesting to see the amount of "cooling" that the fan contributing. Maybe - unplug the fan and Idle for x minutes while watching the main mechanical fan engages multiple times, then cool the engine off for the day. Rerun the experiment with the fan pluged in. I could live with the experiment's error if the testing days were within a few degrees and % humidity. Towing could also generate more intresting test.

I have access to OBDII realtime dataloggers/recorders, but my 94 came a bit early for that...

I'm all about performance CD. A 12 inch fan would fit, but that 10 I got was a no brainer in terms of airflow comparo with the 12 I had (I'm sure a similarly designed 12 would be even better - I just didn't have one handy - yet). In terms of pusher fans, I don't think this requires a 'toyota part' at all if performance is the goal, but I'm sure you could use the one Dan found. Avoid curved blades, they have lower output than the straights, and are only for noise abatement. I can't hear that fan I installed, and it's one of the 'noisy ones'.

Also dedicated pusher fans shape the blades differently (even in straight blade apps) than the puller type (unless labelled specifically as both P/P), so a dedicated pusher fan is recommended, regardless of brand. Watch the amperage draw too, for pushers, you don't need a big fan motor draw cuz you have very little drag force on the motor (read you are blowing into a negative pressure zone already).

The relay circuit I have turns on the aux fan at condenser temps of 130F and off at condensor temp of 115F, regardless of compressor on/off, or engine on/off for that matter (read: afterrun circuit is built in, unless I kill the battery)

In terms of testing, I can do a series of immediate tests using the relay circuit with the above temps and compare the time it takes the radiator fan to get the condensor to 115 vs radiator and aux fan. I'll do this tomorrow if I get a chance.

Scott Justusson
QSHIPQ Performance Tuning
 
cool experimenting there scott but I dont sit drinking my pepsi on top the condensor-I drink me beverage in the cab. So from an AC performance standpoint wouldn't it be better to test the temp in the cab? Put a cheapo ac vent temp gauge (or a mercury thermometer for that matter) in the cab ac vent and test the temp with the fan on versus the fan being off. make sure the car is good and hot and parked and has been running a while with ac on for a baseline AND THEN TURN ON THE FAN. see if the temp at the vent dropes under these conditions. I believe this is the way to see if the fan makes a diff
 
Most curved blade designs are quieter and more efficient, Derale's 14" Tornado is rated at 1350 cfm and 10.5 amp, their 14" straight blade is rated at 1100 cfm and 12.4 amp. Flex-a-lite's Syclone S-Blade is 1505 cfm at 9.2 amp and their straight blade is 1350 cfm at 9.5 amp. The Derale that I have can be mounted as a pusher or a puller with no airflow loss, the blade is reversible, so it has the proper wing airfoil ether way.
 
Tools R Us said:
Most curved blade designs are quieter and more efficient, Derale's 14" Tornado is rated at 1350 cfm and 10.5 amp, their 14" straight blade is rated at 1100 cfm and 12.4 amp. Flex-a-lite's Syclone S-Blade is 1505 cfm at 9.2 amp and their straight blade is 1350 cfm at 9.5 amp. The Derale that I have can be mounted as a pusher or a puller with no airflow loss, the blade is reversible, so it has the proper wing airfoil ether way.

Kevin:
Pretty well documented that curved blades *are* quieter, but *not* more efficient. In fact, their efficiency is one of the lowest at 55-65%. There are several design parameters that can effect comparison of a specific brand, but that doesn't change the physics of optimal blade design vs performance. Spal is considered one of the top manufacturers of blades, try their FAQ regarding curved vs straight at
http://www.a1electric.com/spal/faninfo.htm

I also have a pretty nerdy paper on the subject I'd be happy to send over to you. Thinking on this more, Derale's claim is decieving, it's motor efficiency not fan effiency. I also look at the numbers above, and would think a more efficient fan blade design would draw more amperage from the same motor, because it has a higher work output. I would also think motor life is affected by amp load. Again, the physics properties of the two designs in terms of efficiency isn't up for debate. A lot of marketing and 'other' variables might be.

Again Kevin, this is a very well documented known engineering issue with curved blade designs. S curved blades, now the car industry standard, are some of the worst. Hence why some of the automotive apps have massive draw motors, because the consumer wants the Lexus quiet, make a bigger alt...

The reason I recommend and choose straight blade designs for pusher types is that the noise is a non issue, since it is negated by the stock radiator fan. They also have the best efficiency for a given size and amp draw. Good tidbit on blade mounting for that specific type. Most don't work that way however, they just reverse the leads (flat blade design). It is correct to note that a curved blade design requires a dedicated pusher type, or the ability to invert the blade. I just say, avoid them in pusher applications.

Scott Justusson
QSHIPQ Performance Tuning
 
Last edited:
Dusty said:
cool experimenting there scott but I dont sit drinking my pepsi on top the condensor-I drink me beverage in the cab. So from an AC performance standpoint wouldn't it be better to test the temp in the cab? Put a cheapo ac vent temp gauge (or a mercury thermometer for that matter) in the cab ac vent and test the temp with the fan on versus the fan being off. make sure the car is good and hot and parked and has been running a while with ac on for a baseline AND THEN TURN ON THE FAN. see if the temp at the vent dropes under these conditions. I believe this is the way to see if the fan makes a diff

Dusty:
Happy to take whatever temps you guys want. I don't think it's necessary, cuz I could feel the difference immediately. I also believe that the closer we keep our A/C pressure to 210psi, the more optimal the performance of our A/C system. Why? Because it's well documented in the FSM.

What we all need to understand is that 134a pressures and temps are directly related. You can take either and cross it to the other. The automotive industry uses pressures, because it accomodates different applications and designs (read condensor and exchanger sizes, expansion valve sizing etc). But in reality, once you know the pressures in a given system, you can cross to the applicable temps.

If toyota claims optimal high pressure of our A/C as 210psi, assuming a properly functioning A/C system, the closer I can keep the high pressure side to 210psi (135F), the better my vent temps should be. We certainly know that when the hi pressure switch cuts out at 412psi, we should be measuring 186f A/C temps.... Happy to take the measure however, redundant or not.

Eventually, my goal is to have a standard here we can compare to across the country. Given ambient with A/C running, what's the condenser temp at idle with the hood closed. Then we can move on to getting somewhere regarding low speed, low rpm cooling efficiency and choices.

Cheers

Scott Justusson
 
I recently took some vent temps and it would be nice to compare them with yours.

I was idiling for more than 15 minutes in the sun during a 84*F day and had 52F* vent temps.

This was after a drive to fully warm up the truck.


EDIT: had the wrong temp, memory is fading fast it seems
 
Last edited:
landtank said:
I recently took some vent temps and it would be nice to compare them with yours.

I was idiling for more than 15 minutes in the sun during a 100*F day and had 52F* vent temps.

This was after a drive to fully warm up the truck.

Recirc or fresh air? Temp inside truck? Did you use a probe or temp gun?

I'll make a note to do this Rick, but vent efficiency in terms of measured temp has a lot of variables. Maxing a/c efficiency is a condenser temp/pressure measure. For purposes of comparos, condenser temp at fully warmed idling truck would be better, and my goal for this forum, since it sums all the variables behind the condenser as constant/irrelevent. All of us, no matter where we live, or what we have done, maximize our 134a 80 A/C with condenser temps of 133-135F. I can easily add vent temps to my measuring matrix however.

Cheers

Scott Justusson
 
I applaud you scott for undertaking this project. Good USABLE HONEST OBJECTIVE data is what we need. There is too much "seat of the pants" on forums like these. And few want to admit their mods havn't worked. So please test from in the cab and dont turn on the fan till after the truck is hot and the ac has been running. if under these conditions the ac blows usably cooler I will be a believer.

As a young physician drug reps approach me all the time with some new drug and speak of "reletive risk reduction" of some disease process achieved with their product. They say "this drug decreases symptoms by 40%" and then they show me data that shows how 5% of those in the test group have relief of symptoms compared with 3% in the placebo group. Sure their product has a 40% reletive reduction in sysmptoms. BUT what realy matters is ABSOLUTE reduction which is only %2 in above example. Meaning that in a patient sample of 200 I would need to treat 50 to help one person.

In my recent cold air intake mod you suggested it may not help temps. you were right. the cold air intake was useless in my book even if the mod had not increased my water temps (which was my endpoint) but left them the same because the goal was to decrease water temps enough to see a decrease on my gauge

Dont be a relative risk
 
Last edited:
SUMOTOY said:
Update:
The Install:
If you look at the PS mount, there is a 6mm threaded tab already there for a fan. I drilled 1 hole at the lower crossframe, sealed up the fan to condensor edge with some cam cover moulding (audi) I had laying around, left the bottom open just a half inch or so to allow water to get out easily. Note: The metal fan shroud is sealed to the condenser for maximum flow through the condenser.

So, I'm going to display my ignorance again. Sumotoy, could you dummy this down a little for those of us with fewer :banana: 's to our credit?

-The 'PS' mount = what? Power Steering mount?? I don't think so, but could you define for me?
-'Water to get out easily'...why? Are you talking about water crossings, or what? I can't think of a lot of other times I have water in that area.
-'Fan shroud is sealed to the condenser for maximum flow...' Soooo...you sealed a new shroud to the existing condenser? With what and how? Does this damage the condensor?

Sorry for the dumb questions, but I'm going to St. George with 4 kids this weekend...4-5 days in 110 degree weather, 5 hour drive each way...and if I can pull it off, and it works, it would be a great modification. I have seen other threads from other people on similar mods, none with your details, and they have agreed on the cooling effectiveness. Maybe it's just a placebo for everybody else, but if I can fool my kids in to thinking it's cooler, it's the same as reality.

Thanks.
 
Lucy said:
So, I'm going to display my ignorance again. Sumotoy, could you dummy this down a little for those of us with fewer :banana: 's to our credit?

-The 'PS' mount = what? Power Steering mount?? I don't think so, but could you define for me?
-'Water to get out easily'...why? Are you talking about water crossings, or what? I can't think of a lot of other times I have water in that area.
-'Fan shroud is sealed to the condenser for maximum flow...' Soooo...you sealed a new shroud to the existing condenser? With what and how? Does this damage the condensor?

Sorry, but this is the tech forum, so maybe I assume to much...
- PS= Passenger side USA DS = Drivers side USA
- "Water to get out easily - Trapping water in the bottom of the shroud - water crossings, standing water, leaking radiator, giggles, its just something I did. Absolutely necessary? As a rule if I seal up to a component, I think about trapping water.
- Fan shroud sealed to the condenser for max flow... I used the stock fan shroud that was around the aux fan, and sealed it to the condenser blades with some rubber edge guard. Without the guard, the sharp metal shroud could eat the condenser core.

Sorry for the dumb questions, but I'm going to St. George with 4 kids this weekend...4-5 days in 110 degree weather, 5 hour drive each way...and if I can pull it off, and it works, it would be a great modification. I have seen other threads from other people on similar mods, none with your details, and they have agreed on the cooling effectiveness. Maybe it's just a placebo for everybody else, but if I can fool my kids in to thinking it's cooler, it's the same as reality.

Thanks.

Since my kids sit in back too, that's something to consider seriously, marketing is half the battle. I'll post up some of my conclusions to the tests I ran this morning. Again, I'll hold off on part II, since temps are much more difficult to work with than pressures.

HTH

Scott Justusson
 
No, PS was a noob question, I knew that but didn't tie it together at the time. Thanks for clarifying the other stuff as well.
 
Back
Top Bottom