- Joined
- Dec 24, 2003
- Threads
- 136
- Messages
- 3,559
- Thread starter
- #21
bjowett said:My choice at $320ish... not a drop in though.
![]()
Nice nice nice, but, like you wrote, not a drop in deal.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
bjowett said:My choice at $320ish... not a drop in though.
![]()
LandCruiserPhil said:Doug get a SC or a turbo and you will not need to go WOT![]()
IdahoDoug said:Phil,
Heh - agree. Wonder what heat load those add, eh?
DougM
cruiserdan said:A lot.
IdahoDoug said:Yeah, I'd think. Theoretically, going up the same hill while towing at the same speed before installing an SC would produce the same heat load. It's all a matter of fuel burnt and resulting waste BTUs into the cooling system. But you could lean on the loud pedal and produce a boatload MORE heat with the greater output.
DougM
IdahoDoug said:Turbo,
No offense taken. I agree that forced induction changes things completely and if you're going to be at WOT like that with it you'd be wise to ensure your cooling system and it's heat shedding capacity are up to snuff.
OTOH, I think it's worth noting that Toyota feels the stock cooling system is adequate for a supercharger, which they sell while keeping the factory warranty intact.
Also, pressure wise this radiator will operate at the same internal pressure - less than 15psi which a plastic sandwich bag can handle. The stock rad failures occur from abuse (old coolant going acid, overheats for a variety of reasons), and physical damage (mechanics kneeling on the top tank due to the length of the Cruiser's engine bay, etc). I feel that a stock radiator can handle whatever the stock truck's engine can dish out heat wise as long as things are up to snuff.
But if I were forced induction I'd consider my radiator choices, too. It's just that I'm not sure how you ensure that an expensive unit like this can actually shed more heat rather than just look good - which it most certainly does. Dunno. Anyhow, I agree it's not a direct comparison since you're definitely able to put more BTU's into your cooling system than I can.
But I still contend WOT for several minutes with a combined GVW of 12,000lbs beats WOT for 30 seconds unladen in terms of cooling and engine stress and heat. I'll see if I can scare up some heat data from the old days. To this day, Vail Pass and others are used for cooling system and destructive engine testing with trailers.
DougM
reffug said:325HP stock is fine.
Turbo you got to much time again.

Bambusiero said:Maybe I'm just being stodgy, but what's the point of a "billet" radiator?
Billet just means that it is carved out of a large single piece of metal
by machining away material. So, you waste lots of material and precision
machining effort in order to end up with a thin walled hollow structure.
In the process, the grain structure of the original billet is cut through
and interupted.
Forming, drawing, stamping, etc., are superior methods for this kind of
thing. The metal is cold worked in the process and gets stronger.
It doesn't throw away a pile of metal chips. It's automatically a uniform
thin wall structure. It's cheaper.
If more cooling capacity is what's needed, then more tubes and rows is
what you need. Billet has nothing to do with that.
So, what's the point of "billet" here? Bling, bling, look at how much money
I spent to make this thing? Conspicous consumption?
WikipediaIn metallurgy, a billet is a semi-finished length of metal to be worked in a rolling mill or other process.
tiorio said:THANK YOU! This is the most overused 'trick' word in the book.
Wikipedia
It's a pretty alum rad, granted. Calling it billet may sell more units to the masses, but I'd prefer they use the space to sell me on a feature rather than a buzzword...

turbocruiser said:Wow, that was totally weird ... for some reason that last post posted twice, my icons and emoticons are all acting strange, and the edit function's extremely different. Not done a drop of rum either???? Hmmmmmm?
powderpig said:And how would one remove the top tank on a welded unit to be rodded and then rewelded with no loss of usefull capacity? Is this process done on a regular enough basis that most radiator shops do this? Or would you then have to send it out to Ron davis or similar shop to have it rodded if it was plugged? Or is it throwen away and you buy a new one? I am only asking as I do not know how to maintain the flow of a tottally Alum rad. later robbie
Steve-O said:Just to clear up any confusion, our aluminum radiators for the 80 are in fact made by Ron Davis.![]()
Now, what radiator is bes tfor the 80, that appears to be another one of those never-ending arguments. Once you factor in capacity, material, cost, design, longevity, fitment, etc. you may be back to personal preference. I feel that on average, an exact replica of a copper or brass radiator made in aluminum will definately cool more efficiently, but which one is more durable or better built...I'm really not sure. The aluminum radiator we offer has not been made as long as the stock, but so far no problems that I know of, they work great!
IdahoDoug said:OTOH, I think it's worth noting that Toyota feels the stock cooling system is adequate for a supercharger, which they sell while keeping the factory warranty intact.
turbocruiser said:Yer selling me short, try 375HP!!!
![]()