There are several great bike manufacturers right here in Santa Cruz county, but I am not sure where their frames are made. I think most bikes either use Campy or Shimano components on their frames.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
My brother had a miyata in the mid to late 80s. One of the earliest production ones I've seen. I picked up a Ritchey from that era. Nice bike. Both of those had the rear brakes mounted UNDER the chain stays.
Hold on to that Litespeed, it is from when the name really meant something. I would not buy one of their newer bikes since they became part of the large conglomerate American Bicycle Corporation (which also manufactures Huffy).
Hold on to that Litespeed, it is from when the name really meant something. I would not buy one of their newer bikes since they became part of the large conglomerate American Bicycle Corporation (which also manufactures Huffy).
How about Gary Fisher-they still around? My Trek (94model) was made in Japan. And as stated they play tricks with the stickers. There is a made in the usa flag but it is in reference to the aluminum from Easton.
Gary Fisher = Trek = Gary Klein = Greg Lemond = POS Just my opinion.
I once told our Trek rep to fire half their marketing staff and replace them with engineers. She actually agreed with me. Probably to get me to drop the subject of quality control.
Yeah, that's what I thought about my Cannondale SuperV, historic and sentimental value. They won't sell me parts for the suspension, dealer won't touch it, it's hanging in my basement 'till I go on a cleaning binge.
I heard Klein's quality went in the s***ter when they were purchased by Trek. That's too bad, they're nice bikes.
An impressive bike for sure, and I'd love to have one. But it's really the same basic bike design, done very well and made of titanium. It's better than other bikes in it's price range, but subtly, not a quantum leap forward. The SuperV, in it's early days when I raced it, was revolutionary in concept, design, and fabrication. My SuperV is now a relic, while the Litespeed is still relevant, because there's been such dramatic change in mt bikes, while road bikes are evolving relatively slowly. No, it ain't the same situation at all. Your bike still has strong value as a ride compared to new bikes, while mine has, as I said, purely historical and sentimental value.not that my Litespeed Classic is worth all that much, but it aint the same situation as Super V.
An impressive bike for sure, and I'd love to have one. But it's really the same basic bike design, done very well and made of titanium. It's better than other bikes in it's price range, but subtly, not a quantum leap forward. The SuperV, in it's early days when I raced it, was revolutionary in concept, design, and fabrication. My SuperV is now a relic, while the Litespeed is still relevant, because there's been such dramatic change in mt bikes, while road bikes are evolving relatively slowly. No, it ain't the same situation at all. Your bike still has strong value as a ride compared to new bikes, while mine has, as I said, purely historical and sentimental value.
The Corvette of bicycles?LiteSpeeds are for old guys that have some $$$.
LiteSpeeds are for old guys that have some $$$.