- Joined
- Jan 8, 2006
- Threads
- 265
- Messages
- 9,822
- Location
- Ashland, OR
- Website
- www.jeffersonstatecruisers.com
Oh, there aren't any...
I'm just saying..... Hehehe
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
half dozen extra jest
And what about IFS? You wanna start something boy!![]()

Why? Is he for or against IFS? (I'm assuming against...) But I know Dan, I don't think anything would go down...![]()
The 100 is a limp-wristed IFS pansy wagon with slab-sides, retarded bumpers, ugly mouldings, dumb looking positive offset wheels and a STOOPID security feature.......![]()
cruiserdan said:it's all about perception anyway. It may be that I hate IFS SOOOO BAD that I just can't get past it......
OK, so I'm back for seconds here.
My angle on this issue is as follows:
The 100 series is a VERY REFINED vehicle with very nice appointments and features. The build quality is second to none. It reeks of "this is the way a car should be built".
That being said. I do not care for IFS in a "Real" 4WD. (Nomex suit donned). My last Toyota 4WD truck was an 84 right before they went to IFS. I do not like the "look" of the 100 either. I prefer the 80 over the 100 because of it's styling and it's "crude" solid front axle. I'm a leaf spring guy to boot and I had a bit of a time warming up to coils but now I do like them.
I think I'm un-happy with Toyota the most because they somewhat broke with tradition when they brought out a new platform and engine at the same time. Often they bring out a new power plant in an old body for a year or so. Think of it, A UZJ80. Now that would be the ultimate Cruiser.......![]()


Next work meeting in two weeks at Jerod's house we rip out the IFS and solid axle that MoFo.![]()
