The definitive "What’s really required to fit 37’s w/o cutting sheet metal" thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

cts

Joined
Jan 31, 2025
Threads
4
Messages
57
Location
Golden, CO
I spent the weekend reading posts about 37” tires, and as you might imagine, a search resulted in hundreds of results with a lot of different points of view. As common as this question is, there didn’t seem to be a definitive thread that addressees all the relevant factors, so perhaps this one will be useful to others. This represents what I've learned so far. Please add to it with your real world experience.

Let’s make some assumptions to start:
We're focused here on the most common 37x12.5 tire size (which are typically closer to 36.5" tall.) Wider or taller will follow the same principles, but get even more challenging to fit.
We’ll be assuming a basic 2.5”+ OME lift as a starting point. Obviously usable suspension travel is important, but w/in a reasonable range, static ride height really doesn’t matter when it comes to “will 37’s fit” and many people get hung up on the false assumption that more lift is the key to fitting bigger tires. We'll save optimal suspension height and gear ratios for the hundreds of other threads on those topics.
"Fit" means that the suspension can fully flex w/o damaging the tires or the rig. A very small amount of tire rub on the smooth surface of the frame or fender liner at the limits could be okay. But it needs to fit for rock crawling, not just in the mall parking lot.
No cutting the sheet metal! Chopping the fenders will obviously make space for bigger tires, but for the purpose of this exercise, we’re trying to avoid that. And while removing the flares would be a way to add a little more clearance to the outer lip of the wheel arches, let's see if we can do this w/o removing them, but some minor trimming there is okay.

Now, how to make it happen:
Center the tire side to side in the wheel well:
How far out the tires sit relative to the axle is a key factor. Most people report that 0 offset rims (like stock), and especially positive offset rims, result in the inside of the tire rubbing against the frame and fender liner. Neutral, 0 offset rims aren't a deal breaker, but adding a little negative offset, either natively in the rim's design or by adding wheel spacers to a positive offset rim, solves that. However, pushing the tire out too far results in trouble on the opposite side of the tires, with the tires not tucking inside the lip of the fender. With a 37x12.5" tire, -6mm to -12mm of offset (1/4"-1/2" additional backspacing past the rim's center line) sounds like the sweat spot. A 1"+ spacer on a neutral offset wheel (-25mm combined offset) seems to be too much with the outside edge of the tire hitting the flare and likely the lip of the fender. I'm planning on a 17" rim either 8.5" or 9" wide with -6 to -12 offset. What rim size have you all found to be optimal with fenders and flares intact?

Centering the axle under the truck is also important, or the tire on one side may fit while the other side rubs. Most people account for that as part of a larger lift w/ adjustable panhard bars and/or a correction bracket, but they often aren't done w/ smaller lifts. Either way, if you're getting rubbing on one side but not the other, that will be something to address.

Limit the tire's up travel: If the tires can't move up, they're not as apt to rub. We obviously need some up-travel, so something like a 4"+ bumpstop extension would be a major compromise, even if it helps the tires to fit. A basic 2.5" OME lift doesn't require bumpstop extensions, so anything you add to prevent tire rub will be a compromise that reduces your up-travel. Longer travel shocks typically require more bumpstop due to the longer compressed length, so it's only anything past that point that creates a compromise that's driven by the tire fitment. On my truck, I'm hoping to not exceed a 1" bumpstop extension in the front and 2" in the rear (I already have 1" in the rear to accommodate my Fox shocks), but I'll confirm exactly what's needed when everything else is dialed in.

Center the tire front to back: This would require aftermarket control arms to change the vehicle's wheelbase. Any changes needed would be relatively small, but this might make the final difference in dialing in fit. I didn't see much talk about people needing to alter the rear axle's position forward or back, so the rear doesn't seem like a common issue. Many aftermarket front radius arms are ever so slightly longer than stock, and DVS even offers a version that is 1" longer specifically to fit 37s. If you push your front axle that far forward you probably create rubbing on the stock bumper, but that isn't a problem with most high clearance aftermarket bumpers. I haven't added castor correction to my truck yet and could go with the Delta 3" Long arms instead of the Land Tank 3" castor correction plates I'd previously been considering. Will the long Delta arms make much of a difference in tire fit?

Move the body farther away from the tires: A body lift will create tire clearance similar to a bumpstop extension, but without limiting the suspension travel. These aren't as common on an 80 series, but are a viable option. I'm not planning to do this on my truck, but I mention it here for completeness.

Miscellaneous trimming/adjustments: While my goal is to not cut the sheet metal, I expect I'll likely need to trim a little off the inside of the rear fender flare. At a minimum, there's a small section in the rear corner that seems to protrude a little too much (my truck is a 94 w/ the fiberglass flares.) I'll also be saying goodbye to the mud flaps. Any other minor clearancing or adjustments that would likely be needed?

Okay, with all of that said, is there anything that wasn't accurate or that I may have missed? Is dialing all of that in enough to safely fit 37's?

Thanks,
Chris
 
Should clarify wheel backspacing. Offset is moot as it will vary based on wheel sizes but backspacing is a static reference. So if the stock wheels are 4.5” and a 3.5” sticks out too far then you need 4” backspacing regardless of the flavor.

Also consider that the shock mounting points are fixed, unless you cut and weld new one so you are working with a 14” compressed limit unless you want to add bump stops. Most factory applications have a 50/50 shock stroke bias. I prefer 33/66. So when lifting a vehicle you sacrifice down travel, then by adding bump stops you now also sacrifice up travel.

People offset this by installing longer shocks which basically allows the usable travel/bias to shift down but still sacrifices total usable shock travel.

The 80 can run a 32” tire stock, 33s are the edge, so to fit a 37s you need to clearance about 4”+ which can come with a suspension lift, body lift, cutting, or a combination. So with a 2.5” lift currently you need to realistically come up with a way to find another 1.5”
 
Should clarify wheel backspacing. Offset is moot as it will vary based on wheel sizes but backspacing is a static reference. So if the stock wheels are 4.5” and a 3.5” sticks out too far then you need 4” backspacing regardless of the flavor.
I'd like to better understand your thoughts on backspacing, as I had thought it was the backspacing which was moot and the offset which was the key (realizing they're both directly related.) My thinking was that to squeeze in a 37x12.5" tire, it has to be in just the right spot in the wheel well. Whether it's mounted on an 8" rim or a 9" rim, the tire's size and position on the axle/wheel well needs to be the same. So the rim's offset, or relative position of the mounting surface to the middle of the rim, would be consistent between the two wheel sizes, whereas the backspacing measurement would change. On a 1" wider rim with the same offset, the inner edge would be 1/2" farther inboard and the outer edge would be 1/2" farther outboard, but the position of the tire in the wheel well would be the same. If we kept the backspacing the same, it seems like the wider rim would position the tire farther out, causing more fender contact than w/ the narrower rim. But, it's possible there's something I'm not understanding.
 
I'd like to better understand your thoughts on backspacing, as I had thought it was the backspacing which was moot and the offset which was the key (realizing they're both directly related.) My thinking was that to squeeze in a 37x12.5" tire, it has to be in just the right spot in the wheel well. Whether it's mounted on an 8" rim or a 9" rim, the tire's size and position on the axle/wheel well needs to be the same. So the rim's offset, or relative position of the mounting surface to the middle of the rim, would be consistent between the two wheel sizes, whereas the backspacing measurement would change. On a 1" wider rim with the same offset, the inner edge would be 1/2" farther inboard and the outer edge would be 1/2" farther outboard, but the position of the tire in the wheel well would be the same. If we kept the backspacing the same, it seems like the wider rim would position the tire farther out, causing more fender contact than w/ the narrower rim. But, it's possible there's something I'm not understanding.

They are two sides of the same coin, one tells us the mounting to centerline (offset) the other tells us mounting to wheel edge (backspace). Offset alone doesn’t tell us anything, however backspace alone tells us an absolute measurement for clearance.

The reason we look at backspacing instead of offset is because wheel fitment/clearance of internal components such as suspension, steering linkage, calipers takes precedence over tire placement.

Using an example the 16x8 factory wheel is 4.5” backspacing leaves about 7/8” clearance between it and the drag link. Replacing with a 9” wheel of the same offset is a 5” backspace and leaves about 1/4” between the wheel and drag link. It “fits” but is pretty close for comfort (in my opinion). Using this we know we need 4.5 backspace minimum

So from a wheel clearance perspective:
16x7, +12 os, = 4.5”
16x8, 0 os, = 4.5”
16x9, -12 os = 4.5”
16x10, -25 os = 4.5”

The reason I say it’s moot is that when changing wheels the backspacing remain the same. Unless of course we have clearance for days.
 
Last edited:
I’ve always referenced offset within off road tires and wheels but that’s an interesting look at the difference in factors between referencing backspacing instead.

In your example is the 7/8” clearance between the drag link and the rim or the tire? If it is, it’s rare if ever that in the off road tire world of clearing wheel wells and drivetrain that your rims hit something. It’s always tires since they bulge beyond the rim. Having say a 35” tire on an 8” rim vs a 9” rim only will net maybe .2” wider overall tire when aired up. Which would mean in your example of swapping to a 9” rim your clearance only changes by .1” at the tire. But if you followed the backspacing rule and went with a -12 on the 9” rim to match the backspacing with a 0 8” rim you’d now be offset a half of an inch on the outside giving you more inner clearance than needed and pushing the tire out possibly striking the body fender. So I guess in conclusion if I wanted to go to a wider rim and match my wheel placement that I currently have on my truck I’d keep with the same offset instead of matching the same backspacing.

Bad quick sketch for reference
IMG_9364.webp
 
I’ve always referenced offset within off road tires and wheels but that’s an interesting look at the difference in factors between referencing backspacing instead.

In your example is the 7/8” clearance between the drag link and the rim or the tire? If it is, it’s rare if ever that in the off road tire world of clearing wheel wells and drivetrain that your rims hit something. It’s always tires since they bulge beyond the rim. Having say a 35” tire on an 8” rim vs a 9” rim only will net maybe .2” wider overall tire when aired up. Which would mean in your example of swapping to a 9” rim your clearance only changes by .1” at the tire. But if you followed the backspacing rule and went with a -12 on the 9” rim to match the backspacing with a 0 8” rim you’d now be offset a half of an inch on the outside giving you more inner clearance than needed and pushing the tire out possibly striking the body fender. So I guess in conclusion if I wanted to go to a wider rim and match my wheel placement that I currently have on my truck I’d keep with the same offset instead of matching the same backspacing.

Bad quick sketch for reference
View attachment 4019942
The short answer is, for a complete understanding of any fitment, you need to know both offset and backspacing.
 
@Shoredreamer In your example is the 7/8” clearance between the drag link and the rim or the tire?
In my example, I am referencing the wheel not the tire. Wheel clearance and tire clearance are separate.

If it is, it’s rare if ever that in the off road tire world of clearing wheel wells and drivetrain that your rims hit something.
I'm not sure what you mean, perhaps for mall crawlers, I have 4 rigs and all of them required backspacing considerations. The big things are usually rotor and caliper size (Wheel Diameter), Alloy vs Steel (backspacing), and Steering linkage (backspacing). Here is a photo of one of my Jeeps, it required 3.75" backspace in order to clear the tie rod and drag links and also required 17" diameter to clear rotors and calipers as 16" would rub.

IMG_0051.webp



But if you followed the backspacing rule and went with a -12 on the 9” rim to match the backspacing with a 0 8” rim you’d now be offset a half of an inch on the outside giving you more inner clearance than needed and pushing the tire out possibly striking the body fender.
It doesn't give you "more inner clearance than needed" it simply gives you the same which in this case may be the minimum clearance needed, again wheel clearance =/= tire clearance.

So I guess in conclusion if I wanted to go to a wider rim and match my wheel placement that I currently have on my truck I’d keep with the same offset instead of matching the same backspacing.

Assuming you have inside clearance for the wheel, then yes. This also assumes you aren't increasing tire size to a 37 as OP implied and further assumes that you already have the necessary clearance at full lock between the tire and frame and links/radius arms to fit the larger tire without rubbing.

The question is do you, the answer is backspace.

Here is a good resource.

 
Last edited:
Thank you, all! I think I understand the backspacing concern now. I still contend that the offset tells the story about the tire placement, but you all raise a good point about a certain level of backspacing being a fixed limit for keeping the inner lip of the rim far enough away from the steering components. So we'd want to aim for a rim setup that lands in the -6 to -12 offset range for tire placement while maintaining no more than 4.5" or possibly as high as 4.75" of backspacing (I agree 5" backspacing would be too close for comfort if it only leaves 1/8" of drag link clearance.)

I plan to go with 17" rims for this tire size, so it sounds like 17x8.5, -6 os, 4.39” backspacing might be ideal, although a less common size, with the possibility to fit the tire and clear the drag link at these combos as well. Backspacing in inches ≈ (Wheel width in inches+1)/2 + (Offset in mm / 25.4)

17x8, 0 os, 4.5” backspacing (Stock equivalent but in 17", Not ideal as tire is likely to rub on the inside)
17x8, -6 os, 4.26” backspacing (ideal clearance, but rim a little narrow for that big of a tire)
17x8, -12 os, 4.03” backspacing (tire getting close to the fender flare, rim is on the narrow side)
17x8.5, -6 os, 4.39” backspacing (ideal?)
17x8.5, -12 os, 4.15” backspacing (tire getting close to the fender flare)
17x9, -6 os, 4.63” backspacing (rim getting a little closer to the drag link)
17x9, -12 os, 4.39” backspacing (tire getting close to the fender flare)

Does anyone have any real world experience with how 37x12.5" tires on either -6 or -12 offset rims fit with stock fenders and (mostly) intact flares? The difference between the two rim sizes is splitting hairs, but it would help to know if one fits a little better than the other.

And how critical have longer radius arms proven to be up front?
 
I'm running 37s (13.5 wide) on a 3" lift OME J Series with no cutting sheet metal...

The key was pushing the axles out. I used Delta 3L arms to push the axle forward 1" and Landtanks Extended Lower Arms to push the rear axle 1".

Then I extended the bump stops using Slee's and Parry's extensions.

I sit low with 37s and no rub. There was some trim to the front sheet metal behind the bumper but nothing major.

20231230_101405.webp

20221212_175144.webp


20230812_104034.webp

20240720_084751.webp
 
Im to lazy to write the info so I made a vid.
 
Thanks, guys. I really appreciate you sharing your experience with what's worked for you. (@GW Nugget I read a couple of your older posts when I was doing my initial research on this.) It looks like you both have quite a bit of negative offset on your rims, but also no fender flares. I can see how pushing the tires out helps with clearance right up until the point where they no longer tuck in under the flare/fender lip. And then at that point, we're stuck having to add a lot more bumpstop or needing to trim to avoid body damage. So the question for me is how far out can I go and still clear my flares.

I did some 4-wheeling Sunday and got out to take a look when I had a rear tire stuffed. I'm currently on 295's w/ 0 offset rims and I was clearing the flare with what seemed to be just over 1" to spare (didn't have a tape measure to get more precise.) With a 1" wider tire (1/2" on each side of the rim) that would still leave me around 1/2" more that I could push the wheel out and clear the flare. That makes me think -12 offset (4.5" Backspacing on a 17x9 rim or 4" on a 17x8) might be the sweet spot for those of us still running the stock flares.

I'm going to use the Delta 3L radius arms up front and will wait and see on the rears. Based on your feedback, I'll probably start with 1.5" front bumpstop extensions and 2" rears and then see if more is needed after the tires are installed.

This is a cool visualizer tool from Alloy Wheel & Tyre Fitment Calculator. Offset, Tyre Stretch and Speedo Error | Will They Fit - https://www.willtheyfit.com/ In this example I compared the common 35's on stock rims (315/75/16 0 offset) with 37x12.5 tires on 17x9 -12 offset rims. With the updated offset, it looks pretty doable.

View attachment 4027489
 
My tread placement is for max stability & to keep things away from the body while on the trail.
If one wants to keep tires in under the fender flare to stop mud & debris then don't follow my suggestion.
 
I'm running 37s (13.5 wide) on a 3" lift OME J Series with no cutting sheet metal...

The key was pushing the axles out. I used Delta 3L arms to push the axle forward 1" and Landtanks Extended Lower Arms to push the rear axle 1".

Then I extended the bump stops using Slee's and Parry's extensions.

I sit low with 37s and no rub. There was some trim to the front sheet metal behind the bumper but nothing major.

View attachment 4026000
View attachment 4026002

View attachment 4026001
View attachment 4026003
What wheels are these?
Perfect stance.
 
I thought I'd update this thread for those considering going to 37's.

Along the way I started to second guess my decision, with many people talking about 35's being the sweet spot for the 80. Well, I'm back home from wheeling my rig on 37's at Cruise Moab, and I'm really glad I didn't hold back on the tire size. I definitely appreciated the extra inch of clearance under the diffs and the better roll-over ability of the bigger 37" tires.

Here's what it took:
Rims: I went with 17x9" -12ET rims. I had plenty of clearance from the frame and radius arms. A -6mm offset might have been enough, but I can't say that definitively. I'm glad I didn't go with any more negative offset, as it would have made the tires harder to fit inside the fenders/flares.
Tires: 37x12.5" BFG KM3s. These are noticeably louder than the KO3s I had on previously, but they did great in the unexpected mud I encountered and I remain glad that I went with them. Tread width matters more than carcass width and a wider tread would definitely be harder to fit.
Fender flares: I had to trim more than I'd expected off of both the front and rear flares. It was easy to do (Dremel w/ a cut-off wheel), didn't hurt the structural integrity of the flares, and isn't really visible.
Radius arms: I went with the Delta 3L arms. I think they're a little longer than is ideal, but having some amount of extra length is important.
Fenders: I had to take a BFH to the front of the front fenders. The long-handled two-handed sledge hammer worked a lot better than the short one. The pinch wend in the rear needed to be flattened as well. For it, I started with a hammer and then put a small piece of 2x4 on the tire and jacked the tire/2x4 up into the fender to flatten it down.
Bump stops: I ended up with 2" extensions in the front and 2&1/8" (2" plus an aluminum shim) in the rear
Testing the fit: It is extremely beneficial to pull out the springs and then test the fit by jacking up the axle one corner at a time. That will show you how much to trim the flares and how much bumpstop you need to add. I didn't have any issues on the trail after having used this test fit method at home.
Suspension Lift: You can fit 37's at stock height, but of course you won't have nearly enough up-travel left. I ended up somewhere around 3-3.5" of lift with OME 850J front springs plus a 10mm spacer and Dobinson C97-147VT rears. I paired that with the appropriate length "4 inch" shocks.
Gears: My truck is currently in the shop being re-geared to 4.88, because I wasn't able to get that done before Cruise Moab. I did 17hrs of highway driving and 4 days of off-roading on the stock 4.10s and it wasn't nearly as bad as I expected. That gave me more confidence in my decision to not go all the way to 5.29s. 37's and 4.88s almost exactly match the stock tire/gear revs/mile, so the speedo will be accurate and they're stronger than 5.29s. I think a transfer case re-gear with a lower 3.1 low range and a 10% underdrive would be a perfectly adequate way to run 37's as well.

I hope that helps others as you consider making the jump to bigger tires. And thanks for those that helped me along the way.

IMG_0382.webp


IMG_0404.webp
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom