Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
ShottsUZJ100 said:More splines, thicker and larger gears. Guess is to accomodate the added torque and power of the V8? This is why I'll not do the 80 pumpkin swap in my 100.
ShottsUZJ100 said:More splines
ShottsUZJ100 said:thicker and larger gears
ShottsUZJ100 said:This is why I'll not do the 80 pumpkin swap in my 100.
ShottsUZJ100 said:Others have taken the 100 ARB locker and 80 pumpkin and gears and made a usable 4.88 rear gear set. (Slee)
I suggested you do this a while back due to your 100s weight. Nobody has had breakage or negative issues.
I will do this pumpkin swap on my next 100 that'll I'll build for the dedicated trail. You know I bought a LX450, right? I luv the 4.88's in it! Wish you and your family well!

sleeoffroad said:Hey, it is beat on John day.
Again, Incorrect information. Don't post what you do not know about. In a court of law, I believe it is called Hearsay. I am not a laywer, but I have stayed at a Holiday Inn.
Does this seem like Deja-Vu.
a) The ring and pinion does not have splines.
Answer: The side gears in the differential on the 100 is 32 spline. So when you do the pumpkin swap that you talk about, the side gears for the 100 are retained otherwise you can get the axles back in.
b) The base of the ring gear is thicker. The ring gear is bolted on with just bolts, and not nuts and bolts as the 80. Debatable what is stronger. They are not larger. There is a small difference in contact area.
It is not a pumpkin swap. It is a carrier swap, which when you run an ARB is trivial since you the 80 and 100 ARB carrier is virtually the same thing.
Again totally not right. We took a 80 housing (the thing that the carrier fits in), used a 80 series ARB with 100 series ARB side gears inside and used a 80 series ring and pinion.
So John, when you post, please do not post BS. A pumkin is a collection of parts, and if you do not understand what was changed, don't shoot down our mods, because even my wife knows it drives better with the 80 pumkin![]()
Picture of gear sets.
![]()
https://forum.ih8mud.com/showpost.php?p=386082&postcount=18
sleeoffroad said:don't shoot down our mods
sleeoffroad said:

Originally Posted by sleeoffroad
don't shoot down our mods
ShottsUZJ100 said:I'm very surprised you wrote this. I missed this on the first go around. This is crap and you know it. If "I shoot the mod" down why would I recommend the mod to a good friend and say I'll be doing it to my next UZJ?![]()
More splines, thicker and larger gears. Guess is to accomodate the added torque and power of the V8? This is why I'll not do the 80 pumpkin swap in my 100.
ShottsUZJ100 said:I said:
"Any reason Toyota spent more money enlarging the rear axle shafts and R&P?"
That is a true statement. That's all I said. And again...this was between Drew and me and he knew it. Nobody's debating anything. And yes, I know you ave a 2004. Now go build that thing and wheel in comfort!
ShottsUZJ100 said:Whatever...and what a waste of your time to spell this out here. Doron does all his own work and understands all this better than me. I gave him a quck answer and pointed out that there are no problems with the swap. If he's interested he'd research the old thread and learn all the details. Or, I could have looked it up for him.
I simply re-informed him that there is an option for him to regear. His evpo truck is heavy and he wants gears. Ya can bite me. :
And no, it's not deja vu about strength and gears and all that. In those threads I said that I believe the experts regarding strength and reliability of the parts and the swap. I pointed out that I persoanlly would not take the chance with my current 100 to swap the parts.
Shotts = Bite me x2
Slee = Not biting x0![]()
sleeoffroad said:In short, yes you said Doron should do it, but you would not because it is weaker based on your assumptions on the parts being replaced. Simply wrong.
ShottsUZJ100 said:OK...one more time Mr. Slee Off-Road.![]()
I said I WOULD do the mod and even said it in this thread! Your memory is stuck on my first discussions about this. I've said before I've been "won over" by you and Carl, etc.
I explained that my existing 100 is "done" and it's not worth re-gearing and/or messing with a good thing.
When I get a 2nd 100 and ARB-it-up, I'll do the mod.
OK.....will I have to say this again?![]()