Look what showed up yesterday!

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

I appreciate your opinions on why you should have a spare tire carrier. I'll share my thoughts/opinions on not having one.

First, looks. I go back and forth on this one. I like the look, but at the same time, it's very over-bearing. The tire carrier is all you see. I like the back of the 100 the way it is. The Slee without the carrier is more stealth, especially after I paint match it to the trim. Again, this just a difference of opinion.

Second, visibility. I don't like the tire carrier because it blocks a large portion of the rear window restricting the view.

Third, it's in the way when getting in and out of the rear area. How much of a pain this is, is really subjective to each owner. I had a swing out from Currie Enterprises on my Wrangler years ago, and I got tired of opening and closing all the time. It's even worse now with 2 kids in the 100.

Fourth, where to locate the spare. I have raised the spare tire mounting bracket underneath the vehicle and used a narrower spare tire. I am also working on a skid plate to cover the spare. I like this option because a spare is rarely used and this is the most out of the way place for me.

As far as using the space under the vehicle for something else. I don't plan on adding a secondary fuel tank or water tank. It's just not something I'm interested in having. An air tank is not really for me either; a c02 tank stored in the cargo area is more than adequate for me. Underneath, the spare is out of the way and is rarely used.

If I ever do any more serious expedition type wheeling, I will get a roof-rack. I can always throw an additional spare up there if I need to.

As far as antenna and light mounts go, I prefer roof mounted antenna's for cb's and rear lights can be mounted on my bumper too. I actually plan on adding a couple of rear facing fogs pretty soon.

Cost is relative. Some people believe it is worth it, some don't. To me, the additional $700 is better spent on something else.

I will say this, no matter which one you decide on, they are really well built. The recovery points are very beefy. The fit and finish are nice. Slee has built a very nice rear bumper and has given us all of the options that we have asked for. Thanks Christo!
 
Last edited:
Center of gravity also goes up too with the 50lb carrier and 60lb tire being added 2' above current location.

I personally want the tire carrier but will remove it for the bulk of the time. (Once I get to the point I have enough play money for it) Seems I have too many play toys to channel anything significant towards one toy. :o
 
calamaridog said:
Greg,

I'm with you on all points. The tire carrier would make it harder for my wife to use the vehicle:doh:

The same here.

And the rest o' ya with your high mount tires and carrier are in danger of flippin' over. :D
 
macneill said:
The same here.

And the rest o' ya with your high mount tires and carrier are in danger of flippin' over. :D

Damn wimps !!

Haven`t you ever heard of living DANGEROUSLY ?! ;p

I think Greg gave some great counter-points to the non-carrier version...

But, of course.. I am STILL right !! :D
 
SINCITY100 said:
Damn wimps !!

Haven`t you ever heard of living DANGEROUSLY ?! ;p

I think Greg gave some great counter-points to the non-carrier version...

But, of course.. I am STILL right !! :D


:flipoff2: :flipoff2: :flipoff2: :flipoff2: :flipoff2: :flipoff2: :flipoff2:

Sin, it's YOUR world, we're just living in it! :D
 
Greg B said:
:flipoff2: :flipoff2: :flipoff2: :flipoff2: :flipoff2: :flipoff2: :flipoff2:

Sin, it's YOUR world, we're just living in it! :D


WOW !! ...A 14 finger salute !! ;)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom