Same here. Also there is no such thing as a "Hd" ring and pinion, all the thrid members are the same from FF tio semi float with the exception of the cable and e locking thirds. However, the cable and e locker thirds stil use the same R&*P and other parts, they just ahve the built in locker. Also the cable and e locker share the same basic design, except that one is cable actuated and the other has an electric motor. Luckily all cruiser axles especially in the rear are pretty heavy duty, while I love the FFers I do not see a huge advantage of them other than c clip elimiation, ease of 3rd member removal and some other small things. They may be stronger but I believe only marginally so...HZJ60 Guy said:My 1987 Canadian HJ60 did NOT have a floater rear.
TB
Also most of the diesels espectially of that era actually had less power than the gas models. So there is no reason they would be more "Heavy duty." Also, all Land Cruisers were considered "heavy duty" by Toyota at the time unless they had 5 or 4 cyl engines like the LJ70 and such, which are considered "medium duty" and share some parts with mini trucks. Even then the 1PZ and 3B and dialects 4 and 5 cyl cruisers are mostly Heavy duty so there are no givens...
