That truck is so fine.
Media Cottonland Picture of the Day Thread
- Thread starter wngrog
- Start date
Photo/Video/Audio threads
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Dustin Messina
SILVER Star
Hit some of @wngrog tracks in Winston County. Some cool lakes and gravel.
My wifes 100 still has hers and they work just as well as the day I put em on. Its always cool driving her 100 after my taco with oem yellow bilsteins. Night and day difference. Rear shocks on a 100 series.... never again
Dustin Messina
SILVER Star
The only option.
- Thread starter
- #10,447
This is what the Mosley Motors Cop Motor looks like versus a stock FJ60
Roughly 75% increase in horsepower
More info below
Roughly 75% increase in horsepower
More info below
This is what the Mosley Motors Cop Motor looks like versus a stock FJ60
Roughly 75% increase in horsepower
More info below
View attachment 2046549
@FJ60Cam
Interesting for sure, but I think I'd reserve judgement until at least one or two more 'stock' 60's underwent the same test (I'm assuming this has never been done before in the history of the 2F?).
Your cop motor torque/hp graphs are nice...awesome, actually. Without having seen it, I would have guessed the stock torque curve would have been 'similar' but shifted towards the left...thus producing a lower hp curve. The way the stock torque curve falls precipitously makes me think that 2F is even more anemic than normal, or, god forbid, the clutch was slipping (I'm guessing someone would have smelled that...or they would have caught it with the MPH readings on the dyno).
Cool stuff you guys are doing....just adding my 2 cents.
Your cop motor torque/hp graphs are nice...awesome, actually. Without having seen it, I would have guessed the stock torque curve would have been 'similar' but shifted towards the left...thus producing a lower hp curve. The way the stock torque curve falls precipitously makes me think that 2F is even more anemic than normal, or, god forbid, the clutch was slipping (I'm guessing someone would have smelled that...or they would have caught it with the MPH readings on the dyno).
Cool stuff you guys are doing....just adding my 2 cents.
Ha, he meant 75% over a typical stock 2F on the road. This one ran pretty good. No hiccups, stumbles or slipping clutches. I even turned the AC off 
The graphs did seem to back up my 2F driving experience - "wow, lots of torque off the line", then needing to shift at 3k because nothing is happening. But I did give it the assumption it's 125hp was down to 95 or so.
The graphs did seem to back up my 2F driving experience - "wow, lots of torque off the line", then needing to shift at 3k because nothing is happening. But I did give it the assumption it's 125hp was down to 95 or so.
Maybe @dbbowen will take Lee Majors up there in the name of science
- Thread starter
- #10,452
You can really really tell the difference. In fact so much I’m doing the 60 right now because it was such a turd compared to the 55 and it has a new motor. Remember, I have two other very well tuned 2Fs in stock.
Guys started forming today. Concrete scheduled for 9 am
Yea, I figured my comments would come across wrong...I should have just said that the ‘stock’ torque curve was shocking.
Maybe @dbbowen will take Lee Majors up there in the name of science
I don’t see why not. Wonder if they can fit 37s on the dyno
Childress, TX
Refreshing to see full service stations still operating.
Refreshing to see full service stations still operating.
Still standing after 100+ days of flooding.
Relax....It’s one side-by-side pic.
Relax....It’s one side-by-side pic.
Dang that’s a shame. Wonder when that building was built