What's the point of this thread?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
If you have to ask, WellWhat's the point of this thread?
With your FJ40, what tranny are you using. Without overdrive, even 4:88's and 35's is too much gear, you will scream at 60 mph.What engine you running? I’m currently trying to decide what gears to get. My set up is a 1967 FJ40 with the original 1F engine. I have 1985 FJ60 axles running 35x10.5 tires. I can’t decide between 4.88 or 5.29. I don’t care about top speed, I just don’t want it to be sluggish when starting from stops. I don’t plan on doing heavy 4x4. Mostly overlanding with some hill climbs.
3 speed tranny. 3 on the tree. I’m not concerned with top speed. I’ll probably never be on a road going over 50 and even when I was driving it 30 years ago I never took it on the freeway. Cruising around town 30-40mph. And any of the roads getting to where I need to go it would be short stretches of maybe 55With your FJ40, what tranny are you using. Without overdrive, even 4:88's and 35's is too much gear, you will scream at 60 mph.
engagement. (like on FB)What's the point of this thread?
There's an old chestnut in offroad Toyota circles that 5.29 gears are "too weak" because the pinion gear is too small. Of course, that ignores the fact that lower axle gears mean that the whole reason we're regearing is that the pinion gets greater leverage against the ring gear and therefore feels less strain. The issue with the small pinion becomes more pronounced the lower you go, and it might be a real issue once you go to 5.71, but I have seen plenty of people perfectly happy with 5.29s. I also know people who can break a ball bearing in a rubber room. I'll qualify this by saying most of my experience is with mini-truck stuff, but the principle is the same with the 9.5, and any engine, transmission or body.What's the point of this thread?
I read his question carefully then double checked that we were in the 80s series section.You guys are missing the point. He is asking about a FJ40....NOT an 80. Two different animals...1F and 3 spd
I promise I am sober! I was reading the guy who posted on the FJ40, but it looks like the first post is asking about a possible 80 and maybe putting 44's on it.I read his question carefully then double checked that we were in the 80s series section.
IMO lower gears have the same basic effect of trying to get your rig back in the power band after adding larger tires.
OP is about the strength of 5.29 so post pertaining to that are pertinent also![]()
No worries.I promise I am sober! I was reading the guy who posted on the FJ40, but it looks like the first post is asking about a possible 80 and maybe putting 44's on it.
This is another thread started by the guy in this post with the FJ40.
I looked around the forum and have been reading up on this a bunch but I haven’t seen anything exactly what I am running so I am making a post looking for ideas and suggestion from you fine folks.
I got a 1967 FJ40 with the stock 1F engine. Has both front and rear axle from 1985 FJ60. SOA conversion with Stock FJ40 front spring and stock 1985 FJ60 rear spring. Running 35x10.5x17 M/T’s. It’s 3 on the tree transmission.
It’s currently being built up from being completely stock 1967 FJ40 so I don’t have any drive time on it. It won’t be a daily driver but I will drive it around town a...
- MiSFiTiSM
- Replies: 22
- Forum: 40- / 55-Series Tech
I bounce around different forums as I have both a 40 and an 80 and got confused as he posted here and there.
Sorry to go off.
You probably got confused because it denigrated into a "rolling radius X 2 vs diameter" argument. Could happen to anyone.I promise I am sober! I was reading the guy who posted on the FJ40, but it looks like the first post is asking about a possible 80 and maybe putting 44's on it.
This is another thread started by the guy in this post with the FJ40.
I looked around the forum and have been reading up on this a bunch but I haven’t seen anything exactly what I am running so I am making a post looking for ideas and suggestion from you fine folks.
I got a 1967 FJ40 with the stock 1F engine. Has both front and rear axle from 1985 FJ60. SOA conversion with Stock FJ40 front spring and stock 1985 FJ60 rear spring. Running 35x10.5x17 M/T’s. It’s 3 on the tree transmission.
It’s currently being built up from being completely stock 1967 FJ40 so I don’t have any drive time on it. It won’t be a daily driver but I will drive it around town a...
- MiSFiTiSM
- Replies: 22
- Forum: 40- / 55-Series Tech
I bounce around different forums as I have both a 40 and an 80 and got confused as he posted here and there.
Sorry to go off.