Hi Friends. Please let me start by saying I have indeed run countless searches, read through the Wheel/Tire thread and table, and done additional research. I even ran the entire 200 Tire/Wheel thread through ChatGPT to get a deep analysis.
I'm looking for anyone who has run/is running 285/65 on an 18" wheel with a 40 offset and no lift; mostly concerned with any rubbing until I DO get the lift on.
Specific Use Case: 2016 LC, currently stock with Michelin Defenders. I would like to run 18" Method 318s (40 offset) with Falken Wildpeak AT4s (116T, not E) in 285/65. No spacers, no lift. Per ChatGPT's analysis, this should be good to go; the 40 offset moves the wheels/tires out just enough to provide ample clearance all around. That said, ChatGPT has never actually driven a Land Cruiser to my knowledge.
Near-future upgrade includes a small (1-1.5") Dobinson's IMS. When I start towing a travel trailer next season, we'll add Firestone airbags.
Anyway, if anyone has run this size combo and can share their experience, I'd appreciate it. Looking to validate what I THINK I've read through countless threads as well as the ChatGPT analysis.
Thanks!
I'm looking for anyone who has run/is running 285/65 on an 18" wheel with a 40 offset and no lift; mostly concerned with any rubbing until I DO get the lift on.
Specific Use Case: 2016 LC, currently stock with Michelin Defenders. I would like to run 18" Method 318s (40 offset) with Falken Wildpeak AT4s (116T, not E) in 285/65. No spacers, no lift. Per ChatGPT's analysis, this should be good to go; the 40 offset moves the wheels/tires out just enough to provide ample clearance all around. That said, ChatGPT has never actually driven a Land Cruiser to my knowledge.
Near-future upgrade includes a small (1-1.5") Dobinson's IMS. When I start towing a travel trailer next season, we'll add Firestone airbags.
Anyway, if anyone has run this size combo and can share their experience, I'd appreciate it. Looking to validate what I THINK I've read through countless threads as well as the ChatGPT analysis.
Thanks!