I just got mine and I'm very happy with them. I was most surprised by how quiet they are. I haven't had them off road yet, but I hope to rectify that this weekend.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I'll chime in. I just put a set of these on my 100 last week; size 285/75r16. I came from a set of Cooper STs that I got over 40k out of, despite picking the set up used. I was impressed with Cooper and liked the Maxx, so I went with them.
In just over a week, I've put nearly 2,000 miles on the tires. Much of it highway miles as I took the 100 back to Portland for Christmas. Though I've seen plenty of city driving, dirt and lots of snow and ice. It's also of note is that I syped the center tread blocks for improved ice and hard snow traction.
In short, I'm really impressed with these tires. I mean, really really impressed. I had waffled for nearly two months between these and the DuraTracs.
Some initial observations:
- These things are much quieter than the worn out STs I replaced. Noticeably quieter. I like that.
- I love the looks of these tires. I was worried that I'd lose a bit in the steeze department. Quite the opposite really. (And let's be honest, there are some vanity in tire choices. )
- The STs I came from were Load Range D and the ST Maxx are E. It is noticeable. They feel more substantial and less ballon-like. It is a marked improvement.
- The steering response is improved as is bumps and vibrations. Though some of that could be due to the fact that the tire shop recommended these at 35psi. I think the front could use a few more pounds, while the rear seem to be good at 35. (I don't have my third row seats in.)
- The Maxx is heavy. Remarkably so, in fact. It was very apparent in both acceleration and in braking. Steering is enough to notice, but I like a bit of steering resistance; it reminds me of my days driving my FJ40.
- The weight definitely contributed to a noticeable loss in fuel economy. Now to be fair, I was running a ski rack with three pairs of skis and a loaded rig. I also have an incredible knack for finding gas stations with 10% or even E85 fuel. My Cruiser hates any ethanol. That might contribute to this. However, I typically get about 330 miles out of tank, give or take. I was seeing as low as 250 miles in a tank. On the way back yesterday, economy continued to improve as I think the ECU adjusted shift points and timing to compensate for the increased rotating mass.
- In snow and ice - my primary deciding factor in buying tires - these things were absolutely incredible. The STs were quite good but these were just flat out excellent. I suspect the syping has a lot to do with this. In the PNWet, not a slip, shudder or slide. Rock solid. Deep snow was also terrific, but that's to be expected due to the voids and tread depth.
- Back here in Montana, the ice was no match and still isn't. In typical driving around Bozeman in spots where I knew I would slip if I stabbed the gas or took a corner a bit too fast, the Maxx was excellent; no slipping or sliding.
I'll continue to update this as I see it relevant. Overall, I'm exceptionally happy with these tires so far. Holler with questions.
BTW, at what pressure is everyone running their Maxxs?
The only real complaints of the ST Maxx that I've read about are they are heavy and the sidewalls are stiff for airing down. I am running the BFG's at the moment, but really considering the ST Maxx over the AT3, mainly because of the sidewall. I have no problems airing down the BFG's down to 15lbs. I am guessing that you didn't either with the Maxx? Did you notice any difference with them (I.e., loss of performance and/or mpg), compared to the BFG's due to them being a little heavier?I am in love with mine.
I had run BFG AT/KO's for about the last 11 years on my Land Rover. When I bought the Land Cruiser I wanted to try something more aggressive but still wanted great wet handling, snow handling, and still a decent wear with sturdy sidewalls.
Did a lot of research and finally decided on the ST/Maxx. I could not be more happy.
Just completed a 5,525 mile trip and had no problems. Aired them down to about 15-20psi on trails and back up to 35-40psi for expressway.
285/75/16's.
White Sands National Monument, New Mexico.
View attachment 1097204
White Rim Trail - Canyonlands NP, Utah.
View attachment 1097206
The only real complaints of the ST Maxx that I've read about are they are heavy and the sidewalls are stiff for airing down. I am running the BFG's at the moment, but really considering the ST Maxx over the AT3, mainly because of the sidewall. I have no problems airing down the BFG's down to 15lbs. I am guessing that you didn't either with the Maxx? Did you notice any difference with them (I.e., loss of performance and/or mpg), compared to the BFG's due to them being a little heavier?
Sent from my SM-T700
That's good to know, thanks. I haven't had a need, yet for a little more aggressive tire, but I want to be ready, just in case. The lack of the 3 ply sidewall on the AT3 is what concerns me and why I am consider the ST Maxx.I did not have any problem airing them down. I did not notice a difference in performance or mpg. That being said, if you are looking for an AT tire and have no need for an aggressive mud tire, I would just stay with an AT.
Just a heads up.
I've been running these tires for a while now. I replaced them recently after a blow out. Shortly after replacing them I had one start leaking. I took it in to get patched, and the tire was ruined. It had cracked half way around the lip where the tire seals against the wheel. The tire store replaced it. Just a few weeks later I had another one do the same thing. I started doing some research and found that this is a fairly common occurrence with these tires. I then went back to the tire store and had all the tires taken off the wheels. 2 of the remaining three had cracks in the same spot. I will post some pictures when I get a chance. It's a shame because I liked the tires. I'm now going back to the BFG KO2.
I Google it after I read your post. from what I saw the complaints were between 2011 - 2013. I didn't see anything recent. I've been reading through other forums with threads dedicated to the ST Maxx and so far I haven't read any complaints about them except that they are heavy compared to other AT tires. But, I haven't read through the whole forums, yet. Hopefully, it was a bad batch, because I am really considering getting them.The tires were almost new. So far I am being told it was a bad batch of tires, but if you google it you will find similar stories with different time periods. I haven't gotten to the bottom of it yet, but I'm working on it. I just thought it was something people would want to know. I'll try to get some pictures tomorrow.
I Google it after I read your post. from what I saw the complaints were between 2011 - 2013. I didn't see anything recent. I've been reading through other forums with threads dedicated to the ST Maxx and so far I haven't read any complaints about them except that they are heavy compared to other AT tires. But, I haven't read through the whole forums, yet. Hopefully, it was a bad batch, because I am really considering getting them.
Sent from my SM-T700
something else to consider is that these tires were on my 3/4 ton pickup. although a different vehicle the tires should still not come apart like that. i really liked the tires, as i have said, but i won't be putting them on any of my vehicles anymore. maybe they will be fine on a cruiser, nobody here seams to be having trouble.