Ceramic vs. standard tint? (2 Viewers)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
Jun 17, 2024
Threads
16
Messages
171
Location
Oregon
Going to be getting my KZJ95 tinted, main goals are heat rejection and UV protection. Ceramic is supposed to have 10-13% better heat rejection, UV is the same either way. I'll likely be going with the lightest tint possible all the way around. Normal tint ~$400, ceramic ~$650.

Is ceramic worth the extra $250?
 
I did ceramic and I’m happy with it. I’m not sure you gain much more but I went with it anyways.
 
Alrighty, tint done. Went with ceramic for the higher heat rejection even at the lighter tint levels I wanted - 70% front driver/passenger windows and 35% on the rest. Definitely cooler, main objective achieved.

Appearance was zero consideration, but it does look decent.

Hopefully it's tolerable come winter.

IMG_20250625_184625488_HDR.jpg
 
Ceramic is the new digital.
In the 1880s nobody knew what digital meant but consumers had to have it.
Ceramic is the new digital.
A great way to bilk the customer for an additional $150 in unnecessary crap which they dont understand...
The mark can then remark at the water cooler about his new Ceramic blah-d-blah with a sense of real superiority after have gotten what ammounts to a digital prostate exam...
 
Ceramic is the new digital.
In the 1880s nobody knew what digital meant but consumers had to have it.
Ceramic is the new digital.
A great way to bilk the customer for an additional $150 in unnecessary crap which they dont understand...
The mark can then remark at the water cooler about his new Ceramic blah-d-blah with a sense of real superiority after have gotten what ammounts to a digital prostate exam...
That did concern me. Wish I had experience with standard carbon tint to compare to, but that's unlikely to happen. Since you have strong opinions on this, feel free to share any data you have on carbon vs. ceramic tint and why ceramic isn't any better.
 
I dont have any hard data, and my detail guy (who uses the "ceramic" to sell upgrades) can recite the advertising copy verbatim but thats not facts or data is it?
If one was truly interested its my understanding that the best/only way to determine differences in the 2 products you intend to compare is to find the material safety data sheet for both products.
The companies can hide alot behind "proprietary formulas" and our best peek inside their secrets is the MSDS which they are required to have available for safety purposes.
 
No data, got it.
Yeah i mean i asked my professional detail guy and he could tell me what the bottle says. That tells me that the differences are probably made up.
He couldnt explain what part of the stuff was Ceramic or how that changed anything at all. Which caused me to conclude its all marketing drivel to separate fools from their money.

Expensiver is better. Never let anyone tell you otherwise.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom