Let me try this again,
I picked up a set of front rancho 2 1/2" lift-springs...so I started looking for a rear set.
Morgan (local cruiser-head) had a set of rear used MAF fj55 2-1/2" lift springs for sale...sold
Once I installed the 55 rear springs, the difference was Immediate.
old rancho/55 combo:
You know that section of your daily commute that you avoid...no longer an issue

I'm not sure if it was the increased WB or the improved rear shackle-angle, but the combination was a definite improvement.
After a while, I started looking at my front shackle-angle...pretty much straight up-and-down.
Adding another set of rear fj55 springs took care of that
gatekeeper RIP:
As Brett stated, you are going to have to address your brake-lines and drive-shaft lengths.
Your brake-lines may appear long enough, but the increased droop from the 55 springs has to be addressed.
Longer shackles will allow you to keep your upper-hangers in there stock locations

I'm running 4.5" in the front, with 5.5" in the rear.
Rear shock upper mounting was easily addressed by simply attaching them behind the cross-member (originally in front).
Front shocks were taken care of with the addition of ford-towers. Tim, you didn't say anything about the front, but if you did add 55 springs in front, you would be limiting your suspension system without the ford towers (or equivalent).
Whenever you change your lift, your shocks should complement your suspension compression and extension lengths.
SOR makes special leaf-spring bushings, so stock 40 hangers are not an issue...thank you SOR.
Anti-Wrap bar is not necessary if SUA...not with a powerful 2F that is
current WB = 92"
manny
Brett,
I'm sorry to hear about your rig...truly sucks.