Upgrading a 94 to a 97--worth it?

Joined
Jun 18, 2004
Messages
1,454
Location
Pacific Northwest
I have been toying with the idea of purchasing a 97 in either flavor with around 100k. Right now I have a locked 94 w/145k that is well built and I would take all the stuff like the precision gears, ARB bumper, OME lift, radiator, etc and put it on the 97. Guess the snorkel/sliders would have to stay! All the maintenance would have to be done again along with the birfs. I would also have to drive the new one down to Mexico 1500 miles and drive the old one back up to the states to sell it. I would probably take about 3 months to do the total turn around. Think it is worth the trouble?
 
Joined
Dec 2, 2003
Messages
3,426
Location
Rockville, MD
Nope, what do you stand to gain besides a different dashboard, weaker tranny, and slightly less miles? You'd lose $$ on the deal too, which I think would more than make up for the difference in miles.

Ary
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Messages
1,700
Location
Charleston, SC
I would stick with the one you have. You know what has and has not been done to it service wise. Also you would have to swap parts and go through other hassles that to me would not be worth it. Also, if it were me I would stick to the non airbag model if I lived in Mexico. Thats one more expensive part that would be difficult to get if you were ever involved in a minor fender bender.
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2003
Messages
3,611
Location
Rixeyville, VA
I agree with Ary on this.

If your truck is doing fine then what reason is there to sell it. I have 260k miles and cant ever see selling it to get a different year, low mileage truck. When the drivetrain gets old, why not just rebuild it.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2003
Messages
1,619
Location
LA, CA
Arya Ebrahimi said:
Nope, what do you stand to gain besides a different dashboard, weaker tranny, and slightly less miles? You'd lose $$ on the deal too, which I think would more than make up for the difference in miles.

Ary

You mean the "weaker" tranny that doesn't have the flaring problems and solenoid problems of the A442F? Oh, ok. :rolleyes:

That said, I think you should stick with your rig if you've been with it for a while and if you've done all the maintenance. You know where it's been.
 
Joined
Dec 2, 2003
Messages
3,426
Location
Rockville, MD
alaskacruiser said:
You mean the "weaker" tranny that doesn't have the flaring problems and solenoid problems of the A442F? Oh, ok. :rolleyes:
I just had to throw it out there, 'cause it always gets someone riled up :D That, and I know CDan's got my back on this one, so I can't go wrong :D

Ary
 

e9999

You want to do what...?
Moderator
 
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Messages
16,618
Location
US
not worth the trouble if you don't know the new rig and you spent plenty of time on the ole one.

Need I say "Doug and the cracked head case"... ? (sorry Doug :frown: )
 

NorCalDoug

problems solved daily...
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2003
Messages
6,285
Location
uhhhh...duh...Northern CA
I did what you propose a few years back. I thought it was totally worth doing.

HOWEVER, my 94 was bone stock, so, aside from maintenance, I didn't have much invested in it.

If yours was stock, I'd say go for it. Given that you've made your mods and the difference in miles isn't all that great, I don't think you should bother.
 

Romer

fatherofdaughterofromer
Moderator
 
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2003
Messages
10,906
Location
Centennial, Colorado
I would keep the 94 unless there is a 97 that you really want. But you will be out a lot of $$ to get back to where you are.

Course, you could buy a second one . . .
 

MoJ

Moderator
 
 
Joined
Oct 24, 2003
Messages
3,639
Not a 97 but....There's a cherry 94 at the neighborhood Toy dealer. Locked, no rack, absolutely perfect inside and out. 70k miles or so (50k less than mine). It's been there for a month now and I know it can be bought at the right price. I just can't get myself to give up mine for it because I "know" mine. It takes a while to develop the trust.
 
Joined
Nov 27, 2003
Messages
4,409
Location
Socal
yeah doesn't sound worth it for all the work you put into yours. What is it about the newer one that makes it worth all the effort?

Personally, I think the older dash looks fine. If it's power, can you get a SC for yours? That would be cheaper than all the time and $ to swap over to a 97
 

Biff

 
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
1,901
Location
Los Angeles
Why trade? You pretty much have everything a LC should have, plus you've done all the PM. Why start over, to Install another snorkel, another set of sliders to much work. I don't think its worth it.
 

OZCAL

 
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
1,216
Location
Queensland and California
I'd keep the 94. What do they say - "the devil you know is better than the devil you don't know."

3,000 miles in 3 months? You can do better than that! Put it in high range!;)
 

cruiserdan

SupportingVendor Emeritus
Moderator
 
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2003
Messages
22,813
Location
Land Cruiser Heritage Museum broom closet
alaskacruiser said:
You mean the "weaker" tranny that doesn't have the flaring problems and solenoid problems of the A442F? Oh, ok. :rolleyes:

That said, I think you should stick with your rig if you've been with it for a while and if you've done all the maintenance. You know where it's been.

Need I cite the fact that there is a factory bulletin that states that the 343 was produced without enough balls and some need to be added to correct the operation?...:flipoff2:
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2003
Messages
6,048
Location
Dixie co. Florida
if you can afford it get the 97 and keep the 94, make the 97 a pavenment hauler and run the 94 off road.

other than that keep the 94, there are some minor improvements over the years but nothing close to selling your rig for.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2003
Messages
1,619
Location
LA, CA
cruiserdan said:
Need I cite the fact that there is a factory bulletin that states that the 343 was produced without enough balls and some need to be added to correct the operation?...:flipoff2:
CDan- I was waiting for this exact response from you. This should be our 80's-Tech comedy routine now. :cheers:
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2005
Messages
1,099
Location
Philippines
A three year difference for change is only worthwhile for people who don't do their own maintenance, haven't a clue as to how to maintain a car and don't have the time nor inclination to learn. In short, a suit. In your case I suspect you just want to have new problems to work on. I sure wish I had you next door....


Kalawang
 

MaddBaggins

Remember the KnightRider!
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2005
Messages
3,564
Location
The Old Pueblo
If you get the 97, besides the weak corolla tranny, you get those funny things they put in the steering wheel. What do they call them...oh, airbags. In most cases there is already an airbag behind the wheel, why would you want one in the wheel.:D
 

ginericLC

Wagon Wheeler!
SILVER Star
 
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
7,429
Location
MH, IDaho
The weaker tranny wouldn't keep me away. But the idea of having a better chance of a head gasket problem might. If it had already been done on the 97 I'd be more apt to go for it. I'm at 208,000 on my 94 and I don't foresee any really major future problems. In another 80,000 miles I'm hoping something happens to the motor so I can convince my wife I need to do an engine conversion. I think I will try to make it to 300,000 before I consider pulling a good motor to put a stinky diesel in.
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2004
Messages
1,454
Location
Pacific Northwest
Thanks guys---for setting me straight. I'm only allowed 1 U.S. car here and I have been unable to convince my wife that she needs an 80! I can however import cars over 30 years old(FJ) or anything built in America that is 10 years or older--problem is I don't have any interest in American built. I'm at 145k and average about 10k per year--so another 5 years should be easy. I'm interested in the new Tundra coming with the diesel......
 
Top Bottom