For me I prefer to just pull cable that way I know I’m not going to break anything in the drive line. Yes it takes more time. But that’s what the winch is for.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
It was snowy and icy so I’m sure there was turning while reversing. Thanks for th knowledgeReverse doesn't put birfs at risk. Turning under load does, forward or reverse. Reverse under load stresses the ring gear. So pulling someone in reverse while turning is the worst case scenario.
No. However, you need to hold your brakes anyway because unless you have your CDL engaged, it will slide a tire or two.Just curious but would winching someone out with the truck in park have the same risk to the diff?
NOJust curious but would winching someone out with the truck in park have the same risk to the diff?
And all this talk about breaking the 80 front R&P while backing up with a heavy load has me quite skittish about using 80 axles in my rock crawler plans. I want something lightweight overall, but my thoughts start to circle back to a D60...
I would not worry about 80 axles, while I love Mud and all the knowledge here People tend to over exaggerate problems here.I'll echo what's been stated several times already: trans in park & foot on the service brake while winching, rpm's up a bit via throttle/hand throttle to let the alternator do its job. And backing but while the winch is hooked up is generally not a great idea.
And all this talk about breaking the 80 front R&P while backing up with a heavy load has me quite skittish about using 80 axles in my rock crawler plans. I want something lightweight overall, but my thoughts start to circle back to a D60...
The reverse cut gears in the 80 front diff seem like a good idea, as they are strongest while moving forward, which is the direction you go most of the time. In reality, the trailing axle (rear axle when moving forward, front axle when reversing) takes most of the load, so there is a disadvantage to reverse cut gears when reversing under load- especially if the vehicle is heavy, which many built 80's are.And all this talk about breaking the 80 front R&P while backing up with a heavy load has me quite skittish about using 80 axles in my rock crawler plans. I want something lightweight overall, but my thoughts start to circle back to a D60...
I would not worry about 80 axles, while I love Mud and all the knowledge here People tend to over exaggerate problems here.
My 80 is a purpose built street legal off road rock crawler on 39s and its holding up just fine. I take it to all the hard places Johnson Valley (KOH) Sand Hollow the Rubicon and all sierra trails to name a few. I don't baby it !
NO
For one you should set the parking brake...
If you're not in the vehicle with the brake on, the parking brake will reduce the pressure on the parking pawl through driveline braking.What does that do
If you're not in the vehicle with the brake on, the parking brake will reduce the pressure on the parking pawl through driveline braking.
^^me more often than I’d care to admit…
Honestly I try to avoid backing up as I know it's the weakest link in my drive line. That being said I have been in situation rock crawling that I was stuck going forward and had to reverse over big rock and be harder on the drive train then I wanted. Nothing brokeI have a serious question, as I have watched many of your videos and enjoy watching what you do.
Do you do much in the way of reversing, such as reversing up an incline or forward and backward in a deep mud hole?
I have lots of experience of early GM 1/2 ton and 3/4 ton trucks in deep mud as well as pulling. I have not seen or experienced exploding an R&P doing hard reversing in a "sticky" situation.
That said, I also would NEVER tow or pull in reverse and I wave watched MANY people do this in those trucks with the reasoning that "I have more traction on the front due to the weight of the engine, so I can pull in reverse." None of these had a high pinion front diff.
Then, seeing folks here that wreck a R&P backing up to pull out a shrub really bothers me. I am concerned if I am in deep mud and start banging forward and reverse to get out that I'm going to munch the front R&P in mine. Driving style also has a LOT to do with wrecking things and how hard you are on/off the throttle.
Looking at significant differences between the GM (Dana) axles and Toyota, the tie rod location on the Toyota is in a MUCH smarter place, being on the rear so the tie rod is in tension in a hard pull situation. The tie rod on a Dana is on the front so it is in compression on a hard pull and frequently will collapse when pulling or digging hard.
So Toyota is incredible for going forward, but shows it's weakness in reverse.
Thoughts?
“Slow is smooth and smooth is fast” is the way I learned it! Semper fi!“Slow is fast, and fast is slow.” My kids are sick of me telling them this.