Talk me into it. (1 Viewer)

[SR.GRINGO]

More LX's than LC's?

Wikipedia.....

LC


2000[2] 15,509
2001 7,591
2002[3] 6,752
2003 6,671
2004[4] 6,778
2005 4,870
2006[5] 3,376
2007 3,251
2008[6] 3,801

LX

2000 14,732[9]
2001 9,320[9]
2002 9,231[10]
2003 9,193[10]
2004 9,846[11]
2005 8,555[11]
2006 5,595[12]
2007 2,468[12]
2008 7,915[13]

 

[Liam]

Wikipedia.....

LC


2000[2] 15,509
2001 7,591
2002[3] 6,752
2003 6,671
2004[4] 6,778
2005 4,870
2006[5] 3,376
2007 3,251
2008[6] 3,801

LX

2000 14,732[9]
2001 9,320[9]
2002 9,231[10]
2003 9,193[10]
2004 9,846[11]
2005 8,555[11]
2006 5,595[12]
2007 2,468[12]
2008 7,915[13]

that is interesting. I guess people who would buy a LC dont care to spend the extra $5K on the LX...

 

[1loudLX]

that is interesting. I guess people who would buy a LC dont care to spend the extra $5K on the LX...

exactly why I drive a LX. Had a 4R, almost got a newer one but then looked at the LCs. For all the "options" the Toyota was coming with, just ended up getting the Lexus. If the LC came in a base model in the states, I'd probably have that.

 

[hoser]

Also remember there were 2x as many LX's sold as 100's.

Well, not quite 2x more...


Roughly 95,554 LX's vs 87,584 LC's.


https://forum.ih8mud.com/100-series-cruisers/49691-100-series-production-numbers-usa.html